全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

SEDA框架下高中英语阅读课不同认知层次提问的教师支架性话语研究
A Study on Teachers’ Scaffolding Talk across Different Cognitive Levels of Questions under Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis in Senior High School English Reading Class

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.152259, PP. 432-444

Keywords: 布鲁姆教育目标分类理论(修订版),教学对话分析方案(SEDA),提问,认知层次,教师支架性话语
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
, Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis, Questioning, Cognitive Levels, Teachers’ Scaffolding Talk

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

基于修订版布鲁姆教育目标分类理论,本研究采用课堂观察和会话分析的方法,以教学对话分析方案(SEDA)为理论框架,以二十四个高中英语优质课会话片段为语料,研究支架性话语在不同认知层次提问中的分布情况与低阶、高阶认知层次提问中支架性话语的差异。研究发现,教师所使用的大类支架性话语在频率和类型上存在显著差异,多种子类支架在低阶、高阶认知层次提问中分布不均或呈零星分布。本文建议教师根据提问的认知层次合理运用支架、根据学生的反馈灵活调整课堂话语,来发展学生的批判性思维能力和自主学习的能力。
Based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis, this paper adopts the research methods of classroom observation and conversation analysis to study the distribution of teachers’ scaffolding talk across different cognitive levels of questions and the difference between teachers’ scaffolding talk in lower- and higher-order thinking questions by using 24 extracts of high-quality high school English lessons as corpus. The findings showed a discrepancy in the frequency and type of scaffolding talk used by teachers, and a variety of sub-categories are unevenly or sporadically distributed in low-order and higher-order cognitive level questions. It is suggested that teachers should use scaffolds reasonably according to the cognitive level of questions and flexibly adjust classroom discourse according to students’ feedback to develop students’ critical thinking ability and self-directed learning ability.

References

[1]  中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[2]  兰良平, 柳菁菁. 在课堂对话中促进语言和思维的融合发展[J]. 英语学习, 2024(4): 4-11.
[3]  李丹丽. 二语课堂互动话语中教师“支架”的构建[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2012, 44(4): 572-584+641.
[4]  张艳. 高中英语教师课堂反馈语支架作用的调查研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 临汾: 山西师范大学, 2020.
[5]  胡玲怡. 课堂语部下初中英语教师支架性话语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2021.
[6]  Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete Edition). Longman.
[7]  Walqui, A. (2006) Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 159-180.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
[8]  van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J. (2010) Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
[9]  Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A.M., Maine, F., Ríos, R.M., et al. (2016) Developing a Coding Scheme for Analysing Classroom Dialogue across Educational Contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
[10]  Seedhouse, P. (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell.
[11]  Ten Have, P. (2007) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
[12]  张静. 英语课堂教师支架性话语的会话分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2014.
[13]  Hammond, J. and Gibbons, P.F. (2005) Putting Scaffolding to Work: The Contribution of Scaffolding in Articulating ESL Education. Prospect, 20, 6-30.
[14]  何晓东, 兰良平. 基于思维品质培养的英语课堂提问实施[J]. 中小学外语教学(中学篇), 2019, 42(4): 13-18.
[15]  郑白玲, 刘世英. 定制式大学英语阅读自主学习平台设计模式研究[J]. 外国语文, 2016, 32(2): 148-151.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133