|
Dispute Settlement 2025
网络暴力刑法规制的理论反思与路径重塑
|
Abstract:
信息网络技术的普及在方便人们生活的同时也带了一系列复杂的社会治理问题,网络暴力就是其中极具典型的一项。作为一个并非法律规范意义上的概念,网络暴力现象虽然早就得到了法学界的关注,但在如何规制该类问题上仍存在着较大的争议。理论上,网络暴力基础理论概念众说纷纭;实践中,又多以民、行责任为主,刑事法律的介入具有滞后性。笔者认为,作为一个严重危害网络空间的社会问题,应将其尽完全纳入刑事法律体系之内。本文则主要对网络暴力刑法规制的既有理论进行反思探讨,继而期望找到一条相对合理的规制网络暴力的路径。
The popularization of information network technology has brought about a series of complex social governance issues while facilitating people’s lives, among which online violence is a very typical one. As a concept that is not legally regulated, although the phenomenon of online violence has long received attention from the legal community, there is still significant controversy over how to regulate such issues. In theory, there are various opinions on the basic theoretical concepts of online violence; In practice, the main focus is on civil and administrative responsibilities, and the intervention of criminal law lags behind. The author believes that as a serious social issue that poses a threat to cyberspace, it should be fully incorporated into the criminal legal system. This article mainly reflects on and explores the existing theories of criminal law regulation of online violence, and then hopes to find a relatively reasonable path to regulate online violence.
[1] | 石经海, 黄亚瑞. 网络暴力刑法规制的困境分析与出路探究[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 44(4): 78-89. |
[2] | 姜方炳. “网络暴力”: 概念、根源及其应对——基于风险社会的分析视角[J]. 浙江学刊, 2011(6): 181-187. |
[3] | 林凌. 网络暴力舆论传播原因及法律治理[J]. 当代传播, 2011(3): 76-78+83. |
[4] | 周光权. 刑法各论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021. |
[5] | 冷必元. 刑事不法与社会危害性的整体评价理论[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2023. |
[6] | 侯玉波, 李昕琳. 中国网民网络暴力的动机与影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 54(1): 101-107. |
[7] | 罗譞. 网络暴力的微观权力结构与个体的“数字性死亡” [J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2020, 42(6): 151-157. |
[8] | 田圣斌, 刘锦. 社会治理视域下网络暴力的识别与规制[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 40(3): 168-173. |
[9] | 敬力嘉, 胡隽. 网络暴力法律规制的完善路径[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(5): 142-149. |
[10] | 郭旨龙. 网络暴力刑法治理的解释原理[J]. 江汉论坛, 2023(5): 119-127. |
[11] | 王洪涛, 董惠姗. 网络舆论暴力的刑法规制[J]. 黑龙江社会科学, 2021(1): 67-72. |
[12] | 刘艳红. 理念、逻辑与路径: 网络暴力法治化治理研究[J]. 江淮论坛, 2022(6): 21-30+2. |