Background of the Study: Femoral shaft fracture is the most common pediatric injury requiring hospitalization. For children less than 5 years old, non-surgical approach is recommended. For pediatric patients 5 - 14 years old, the most common mode of treatment is flexible intramedullary nailing with a known complication of pain at post-op site, inflammatory reaction/bursitis at the entry site, superficial and deep infection, knee synovitis, knee stiffness, leg length discrepancy, proximal nail migration, angulation or malunion, delayed and non-union, implant breakage. This study aims to present a rare complication of a femoral fracture fixed with flexible intramedullary nail. Methodology: We report the outcome of a 12-year-old male with peri implant fracture of the left femur. He underwent removal of plates and screws and subsequently fixed with flexible intramedullary nails. Patient was followed up at 1, 3, 7, and 10 months post-operatively. Varus-valgus, sagittal angulation, and limb shortening were measured pre- and post-operatively. Complications were recorded on each visit. Results: Pre-operative varus angulation was 10?, pro-curvatum of 55? with limb shortening of 4 cm. Postoperatively, varus was maintained to 10? but pro-curvatum was corrected to 4? and limb shortening was reduced to 1 cm. However, after 1 month the varus angulation increased to 30? while maintaining sagittal pro-curvatum. Limb shortening also increased to 2 cm. New bone formation started to appear along the mechanical axis of the left femur which is apparent at 3 months post-op and pro-curvatum increased to 20?. At 7 and 10 months post-op no signs of union was noted at the fracture site but the callus formation along the mechanical axis gradually matured and appeared as a new femoral shaft. Conclusion: Formation of new bone in response to unstable flexible intramedullary fixation in pediatric femoral shaft fracture is a very rare complication.
References
[1]
Barry, M. and Paterson, J.M.H. (2004) Flexible Intramedullary Nails for Fractures in Children. TheJournalofBoneandJointSurgery.BritishVolume, 86, 947-953. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.15273
[2]
Sarkar, S., Bandyopadhyay, R. and Mukherjee, A. (2013) Titanium Elastic Nail—Complications in the Treatment of Paediatric Diaphyseal Fracture of Femur. TheOpenOrthopaedicsJournal, 7, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010012
[3]
Nisar, A., Bhosale, A., Madan, S.S., Flowers, M.J., Fernandes, J.A. and Jones, S. (2013) Complications of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Treating Paediatric Long Bone Fractures. JournalofOrthopaedics, 10, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.003
[4]
Lascombes, P., Nespola, A., Poircuitte, J.M., Popkov, D., de Gheldere, A., Haumont, T., et al. (2012) Early Complications with Flexible Intramedullary Nailing in Childhood Fracture: 100 Cases Managed with Precurved Tip and Shaft Nails. Orthopaedics&Traumatology:Surgery&Research, 98, 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.011
[5]
Singh, P. and Kumar, R. (2012) Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fracture Management by Titanium Elastic Nailing; A Prospective Study of 112 Patients. The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery, 19. https://ispub.com/IJOS/19/3/14336
[6]
Volpon, J.B., Perina, M.M., Okubo, R. and Maranho, D.A.C. (2012) Biomechanical Performance of Flexible Intramedullary Nails with End Caps Tested in Distal Segmental Defects of Pediatric Femur Models. JournalofPediatricOrthopaedics, 32, 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e318259fe31
[7]
Dietz, H. and Schmittenbecher, P. (2006) AO Manual of Fracture Management. Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) in Children. AO Publishing.
[8]
Narayanan, U.G., Hyman, J.E., Wainwright, A.M., Rang, M. and Alman, B.A. (2004) Complications of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Pediatric Femoral Fractures, and How to Avoid Them. JournalofPediatricOrthopaedics, 24, 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200407000-00004
[9]
Neagu, T.P., Ţigliş, M., Cocoloş, I. and Jecan, C.R. (2016) The Relationship between Periosteum and Fracture Healing. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 57, 1215-1220.
[10]
Prendergast, P.J. and Huiskes, R. (1995) The Biomechanics of Wolff’s Law: Recent Advances. IrishJournalofMedicalScience, 164, 152-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02973285
[11]
Weinstein, S. and Buckwalter, J. (2005) Turek’s Orthopaedics, Principles and Their Application. 6th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 19.