全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improving Graduate Curriculum Education System under the “Three-All Education” Concept: Pathways for Advancement

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2025.132002, PP. 17-29

Keywords: Three-All Education, Graduate Education, Curriculum Reform, Ideological and Political Education

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to enhance graduate curriculum education by addressing challenges and proposing reforms under the “Three-All Education” concept, which emphasizes all-staff, whole-process, and all-round education to cultivate well-rounded, high-level talent. Approach: The study explores the significance of integrating educational principles into graduate curricula. Using literature review and questionnaire-based surveys, it analyzes the challenges currently faced in building graduate curriculum systems. Jiangsu University serves as a case study to propose practical strategies. Findings: The study identifies critical pathways for reform, including interdisciplinary curriculum integration, innovative teaching methods, practical skill development, and holistic assessment systems. These reforms address existing shortcomings and align graduate education with the broader objectives of fostering intellectual growth, professional expertise, and social responsibility. Value: This study contributes to the evolving discourse on higher education reform in China, offering actionable strategies to align graduate education with the “Three-All Education” framework. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and educators seeking to enhance curriculum effectiveness and support national development goals.

References

[1]  China Education News (2024). Breaking down Disciplinary Boundaries: The Integration of Science, Technology, and Humanities in International Higher Education Trends.
http://www.jyb.cn/rmtzgjyb/202410/t20241024_2111260584.html
[2]  Dong, X., & Li, H. (2020). Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of “Three-All Education” in Universities. Ideological Education Research, 2020, 148-152.
[3]  Feng, G. (2017). Four Key Points for Innovation in Ideological and Political Education. Teaching and Research, 2017, 23-29.
[4]  Hao, F. (2019). The Role of University Teachers in Curriculum-Based Moral Education in the New Era. Journal of Jilin Engineering and Technical Teachers College, 35, 23-26.
[5]  Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2017). Guidelines for Improving the Quality of Ideological and Political Work in Higher Education Institutions.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A12/s7060/201712/t20171206_320698.html
[6]  Qi, J. (2020). Research on Collaborative Innovation in University Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Normal University.
[7]  Wang, R. (2019). Building a Comprehensive Framework for Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education in Universities. Journal of Ideological and Theoretical Education, 2019, 122-126.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133