全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Transforming Croatia through U.S. Military Modernization Policies: Economic and Societal Implications

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2025.132001, PP. 1-16

Keywords: Economic Development, International Security Policies, Military Modernization, Professionalization, Social Mobility

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study investigates the impact of U.S. security policies on Croatia’s economic and social transformation, with a particular focus on military modernization. The research examines key initiatives such as the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program, which has trained over 700 Croatian officers, and equipment donations, including Black Hawk helicopters. Employing archival analysis, media discourse evaluation, and comparative case studies with Poland and Estonia, the study provides a robust framework to understand the broader implications of transnational security partnerships. Findings reveal that U.S. security policies enhance defense capabilities, foster economic growth through technological innovation, and professionalize military institutions. However, generational divides in public perception present a significant challenge. Older generations express concerns regarding sovereignty and dependency, whereas younger demographics view modernization as a pathway to career opportunities and social mobility. The study underscores the importance of balancing external support with domestic innovation to ensure sustainable economic development and long-term social stability in transitional democracies. These insights aim to inform policymakers addressing the challenges of aligning global partnerships with local development priorities.

References

[1]  Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2020). Social Media Narratives in Public Trust and Military Reform. Media Studies Quarterly, 12, 200-215.
[2]  Cohn, L., & Toronto, N. (2017). Why Democracies Do Not Abolish the Draft: Civil-Military Relations and Conscription. Armed Forces & Society, 43, 404-429.
[3]  Cohn, L., & Toronto, N. (2021). Military Training and Economic Impact: A Study of Transnational Partnerships. Armed Forces & Society, 47, 421-439.
[4]  Danilova, E., & Vorozhtsov, A. (2018). The Russian National Branding of Innovations in Defense Industry Complex as the Answer to Global Challenges of the Present. MATEC Web of Conferences, 243, Article No. 00001.
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824300001
[5]  Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855-870.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12078
[6]  Gansler, J. S., & Lucyshyn, W. (2013). Defense Acquisition Reform 1960-2009: An Elusive Goal. Rowman & Littlefield.
[7]  Gheciu, A. (2020a). Security Partnerships in Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. International Studies Review, 22, 125-140.
[8]  Gheciu, A. (2020b). Security and the Politics of Trust: The Rebuilding of NATO. International Studies Quarterly, 64, 739-752.
[9]  Government Accountability Office (2023). Annual IMET Impact Report: Partnering for Global Security. United States Government Accountability Office.
https://www.gao.gov
[10]  Harig, C., Jenne, N., & Ruffa, C. (2021a). Operational Experiences, Military Role Conceptions, and Their Influence on Civil-Military Relations. European Journal of International Security, 7, 1-20.
[11]  Harig, C., Jenne, N., & Ruffa, C. (2021b). Bridging Trust Gaps in Defense Modernization: A Comparative Study. International Studies Quarterly, 64, 456-471.
[12]  Huntington, S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[13]  Inglehart, R. F. (2020). Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge University Press.
[14]  Lambert, R. (2011). Balancing Foreign Aid and Domestic Innovation in Transitional Democracies. Journal of Political Economy, 18, 213-230.
[15]  McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1974). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
[16]  NATO (2022). Annual Report 2022. North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
https://www.nato.int
[17]  NATO Allied Command Transformation (2024). Alliances and Partnerships in a Complex and Challenging Security Environment. NATO Publications.
https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/NATO-AC24-Compendium.pdf
[18]  NATO Annual Report (2023). Strategic Partnerships and Modernization Initiatives. NATO Publications.
[19]  NATO Public Diplomacy Division (2023). Annual Report 2023. NATO Publications.
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/4/pdf/240419-SPS-AnnualReport2023.pdf
[20]  Nye, J. S. (2012). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
[21]  Nye, J. S. (2022). Soft Power and Security in a Fragmented World. International Studies Quarterly, 66, 905-919.
[22]  Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
[23]  Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic Development (13th ed.). Pearson.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133