It is widely recognized by many within the scientific community that the field of seismology faces challenges in aligning with established scientific practices for studying earthquakes. Some views may suggest a reliance on methods that resemble divination rather than sound scientific inquiry. Despite efforts to understand seismic phenomena over the past three centuries [1], progress in seismology has been perceived as somewhat stagnant. Criticisms have been raised about certain theories, such as Mr. Reid’s Elastic Recoil theory from 1910 [2], and its purported advancements in comprehending seismic processes. While acknowledging various perspectives on this matter [3]-[7], it is important to reflect on the historical context and potential limitations in our understanding. Addressing concerns raised within the discipline involves examining educational practices and fostering a rigorous academic environment to promote scientific excellence. This article aims to explore the underlying factors contributing to the current state of seismology, offering insights into overcoming challenges and fostering advancements that benefit the scientific community and society as a whole.
References
[1]
Reid, H.F. (1910) The Elastic-Rebound Theory of Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Department of Geology, University of California Publications, 6, 413-444.
[2]
Bychkov, S. (2023) Earthquakes That Determined the Course of Development of Science. Progress and Regression of Geophysics over the Past 300 Years. Modern Foundations for the Formation of Earthquake Energy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4522274
[3]
Eibi, G.A. (1982) Earthquake. Nedra.
[4]
Gorshkov, G.P. (1984) Regional Seismotectonics of the Southern Territory of the USSR. Alpine Belt. Nauka, Moscow, 272 p. (In Russian).
[5]
Rebetsky, Y.L. (2008) The Current State of the Theory of Earthquake Prediction. The Results of the Assessment of Natural Stresses and the New Model of the Earthquake Source. http://yak.ifz.ru/pdf-lib-yak/Pages359-395.pdf
[6]
Mishin S.O. (2016) Elastic Recoil Hypothesis in Seismology. Internet Magazine “Technology of Technosphere Safety”. http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2016-2/13-02-16.ttb.pdf
[7]
Bakun, W.H., Aagaard, B., Dost, B., Ellsworth, W.L., Hardebeck, J.L., Harris, R.A., et al. (2005) Implications for Prediction and Hazard Assessment from the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake. Nature, 437, 969-974. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04067
[8]
Bohr, N. (1921) Atomic Structure. Nature. https://zenodo.org/records/1429652
[9]
Encyclopædia Britannica: Joseph Henry. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Henry
[10]
Semenov, N.N. (1956) Some Problems Relating to Chain Reactions and to the Theory of Combustion. Nobel Lecture.
[11]
Buchachenko, A.L. (2014) Magnetoplasticity and the Physics of Earthquakes. Can a Catastrophe Be Prevented? UspekhiFizicheskihNauk, 184, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.3367/ufnr.0184.201401e.0101
[12]
Bychkov, S. (2020) Seismic Processes in the Light of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Evolution of the Universe. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521526
[13]
Bychkov, S. (2020) Why Do Earthquakes Happen? Ask Plumbers! https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521576
[14]
Kuroda, P.K. (1956) On the Nuclear Physical Stability of the Uranium Minerals. TheJournalofChemicalPhysics, 25, 781-782. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1743058
[15]
Meshik, A.P. (2005) The Workings of an Ancient Nuclear Reactor. ScientificAmerican, 293, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1105-82
[16]
Bychkov, S. (2023) Tectonic Weapons of Mass Destruction, Myth or Reality? https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4366387
[17]
Bychkov, S. (2020) Magma as a Generator of Plasma and Thermonuclear Fusion in the Bowels of the Earth. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3738328
