全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

企业发行绿色债券对ESG评级的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Corporate Green Bond Issuance on ESG Ratings

DOI: 10.12677/pm.2025.151037, PP. 354-374

Keywords: ESG评级,绿色债券发行,异质性分析,机制分析
ESG Ratings
, Green Bond Issuance, Heterogeneity Analysis, Mechanism Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

绿色债券作为绿色金融的重要组成部分,在中国仍处于起步阶段,需要政府的更多政策扶持。ESG评价体系作为评估企业绿色发展和可持续性的重要工具,在中国追求实现碳排放峰值和中和目标的过程中,发挥着增强企业可持续经营能力、促进经济向绿色低碳方向转型的重要作用。文章研究的重点是企业发行绿色债券对企业ESG评级的影响。基于2010~2022年数据,以企业绿色债券发行为解释变量,以企业信誉得分和企业金融化为调节变量,以企业ESG评级作为被解释变量,先后运用固定效应模型、调节效应模型、异质性分析和机制分析探究核心变量对企业ESG评级的促进作用及其作用渠道。结果表明:1) 企业发行绿色债券对ESG评级有比较明显的正向作用;2) 企业信誉得分和企业金融化可以有效提高绿色债券对企业ESG评级的促进作用;3) 在行业污染程度上,绿色债券的发行对重污染企业的作用效果更为显著;在产权性质上,绿色债券的发行对非国有企业的ESG表现更为显著。从要素密集度来看,非技术密集型企业受绿色债券发行的助力较大;在区域异质性上,东部和中部地区的企业发行绿色债券对提升企业的ESG绩效具有更加明显的正面效果;4) 企业发行绿色债券可以通过融资约束、环保投资和绿色创新效率等机制提高其ESG表现;5) 绿色债券发行能够增强企业ESG评级水平,并且该结论在经过排除区域绿色金融改革政策、疫情冲击以及缩短样本期间等一系列稳健性检验的基础上依旧成立。最后,文章基于实证结果对绿色金融提出相应的建议:完善绿色金融市场,创新绿色金融产品,促进绿色金融与政策的良性互动。
As an important component of green finance, green bonds are still in their infancy in China and require more policy support from the government. The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) evaluation system, as a crucial tool for assessing corporate green development and sustainability, plays a significant role in enhancing corporate sustainable management capabilities and promoting the transformation of the economy towards green and low-carbon directions, especially as China pursues its goals of carbon peak and neutrality. The focus of this study is on the impact of corporate green bond issuance on ESG ratings. Based on data from 2010 to 2022, with corporate green bond issuance as the explanatory variable, corporate credit scores and financialization as moderating variables, and corporate ESG ratings as the dependent variable, this paper employs fixed-effects models, moderation effect models, heterogeneity analysis, and mechanism analysis to explore the promoting effect of core variables on corporate ESG ratings and their channels of action. The results indicate: 1) The issuance of green bonds by companies has a relatively significant positive effect on ESG ratings; 2) Corporate credit scores and financialization can effectively enhance the promoting effect of green bonds on corporate ESG ratings; 3) In terms of industry pollution levels, the issuance of green bonds has a more pronounced effect on heavily polluting enterprises, and in terms of property rights, the issuance of green bonds has a more significant impact on the ESG performance of non-state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of factor intensity, non-technology-intensive enterprises benefit more from the issuance of green bonds, and in terms of regional

References

[1]  方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 91-106.
[2]  王营, 冯佳浩. 绿色债券促进企业绿色创新研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022(6): 171-188.
[3]  刘海英, 王殿武, 尚晶. 绿色信贷是否有助于促进经济可持续增长——基于绿色低碳技术进步视角[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2020, 60(3): 96-105, 237.
[4]  王翌秋, 谢萌, 郭冲. 企业ESG表现影响银行信贷决策吗——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2023, 38(5): 97-114.
[5]  任晓姝. 绿色债券发行与企业ESG表现[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 47(3): 1-22.
[6]  杨博文, 吴文锋, 杨继彬. 绿色债券发行对承销商的溢出效应[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(9): 206-236.
[7]  李宗泽, 李志斌. 企业ESG信息披露同群效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5): 126-138.
[8]  斯丽娟, 曹昊煜. 绿色信贷政策能够改善企业环境社会责任吗——基于外部约束和内部关注的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(4): 137-155.
[9]  孙少岩, 王笑音, 高翠云. 绿色信贷能发挥碳减排效应吗? [J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2023, 33(8): 37-47.
[10]  程庆庆, 刘志铭. 绿色金融政策对污染企业ESG绩效的影响——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 学术研究, 2024(2): 101-109.
[11]  陆菁, 鄢云, 王韬璇. 绿色信贷政策的微观效应研究——基于技术创新与资源再配置的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(1): 174-192.
[12]  詹小颖. 绿色债券发展的国际经验及我国的对策[J]. 经济纵横, 2016(8): 119-124.
[13]  王玉林, 周亚虹. 绿色金融发展与企业创新[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(1): 49-62.
[14]  王康仕, 孙旭然, 王凤荣. 绿色金融、融资约束与污染企业投资[J]. 当代经济管理, 2019, 41(12): 83-96.
[15]  姜照华, 马娇. 绿色创新与环境污染、能源消耗的相互关系研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(4): 160-166.
[16]  沈璐, 廖显春. 绿色金融改革创新与企业履行社会责任——来自绿色金融改革创新试验区的证据[J]. 金融论坛, 2020, 25(10): 69-80.
[17]  刘凤委, 邬展霞, 眭洋扬. 市场化程度、产权性质与公司税负波动研究[J]. 税务研究, 2016(3): 103-107.
[18]  苏冬蔚, 刘子茗. 绿色金融改革是否影响企业绿色绩效与漂绿风险? [J]. 国际金融研究, 2023(4): 74-85.
[19]  常丽娟, 屈雯. 股权集中度、控股股东行为与企业绩效——基于上证A股的实证研究[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2015(1): 101-108.
[20]  钱明, 吕明晗, 沈弋. 同群正面环保叙述对企业绿色投资的溢出效应研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(11): 1608-1616.
[21]  万志宏, 曾刚. 国际绿色债券市场: 现状、经验与启示[J]. 金融论坛, 2016, 21(2): 39-45.
[22]  赵亚雄, 王修华, 刘锦华. 绿色金融改革创新试验区效果评估——基于绿色经济效率视角[J]. 经济评论, 2023, 240(2): 122-138.
[23]  Flammer, C. (2020) Green Bonds: Effectiveness and Implications for Public Policy. Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, 1, 95-128.
https://doi.org/10.1086/706794
[24]  Banerjee, S.B. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51-79.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623
[25]  Hirshleifer, D., Lourie, B., Ruchti, T.G. and Truong, P. (2020) First Impression Bias: Evidence from Analyst Forecasts. Review of Finance, 25, 325-364.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa015
[26]  Cai, H., Jiang, Y. and Liu, X. (2022) Investor Attention, Aggregate Limit-Hits, and Stock Returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, Article ID: 102265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102265
[27]  Li, F. (2012) Discussion of Analyzing Speech to Detect Financial Misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 393-400.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00451.x
[28]  Marquez-Illescas, G., Zebedee, A.A. and Zhou, L. (2018) Hear Me Write: Does CEO Narcissism Affect Disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 401-417.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3796-3
[29]  Lyon, T.P. and Montgomery, A.W. (2015) The Means and End of Greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28, 223-249.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
[30]  Tan, Y. and Zhu, Z. (2022) The Effect of ESG Rating Events on Corporate Green Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Managers' Environmental Awareness. Technology in Society, 68, Article ID: 101906.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
[31]  Broadstock, D.C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M. and Tzeremes, N.G. (2020) Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact Firms’ Innovation Capacity? The Indirect Link between Environmental & Social Governance Implementation and Innovation Performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133