A lack of mathematical economic demand models for addictive goods that account for nonconvex consumer preferences with thresholds resulting in discontinuous demand curves (frequently with bifurcations) is often attributed to the need that economic variables must be relevant to incentivize behavioral changes in addicts. Once addiction thresholds are reached, and economic variables such as prices or taxes become less efficient or completely inefficient in their corrective role, addressing underlying causal addiction issues becomes maybe the only remedy to the problem. The objective of this paper is to develop a mathematical categorization of threshold phenomena and subsequently suggest a different way to model demand for addictive goods from what has been a standard practice to date. Non-exhaustive set of threshold phenomena including a discontinuous threshold phenomenon (DTP), a singular-point threshold phenomenon (STP), and quasi-threshold phenomenon (QTP) are defined mathematically and presented visually. While economic variables may play a preventative role in addictive goods consumption, prescriptive component in addiction economics research can be accommodated in the models such as these developed here. It is more realistic and useful when coming modeling of addictive behavior comes from positive, rather than normative, framework and analysis. In such cases, the transfer of knowledge acquired through addiction intervention research into clinical settings has great promise as a means of increasing treatment effectiveness and facilitating greater consistency in practice. Indeed, recognizing what are the root causes of observed, actual health behaviors are more likely to lead to more efficient policy interventions. Riches of models in health behaviors research and epidemiology may serve as a good starting point to retooling an economist’s thinking on the subject.
References
[1]
Barthold, T. A., & Hochman, H. M. (1988). Addiction as Extreme‐Seeking. EconomicInquiry,26, 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01671.x
[2]
Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A Theory of Rational Addiction. JournalofPoliticalEconomy,96, 675-700. https://doi.org/10.1086/261558
[3]
Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. TheAmericanEconomicReview,84, 396-418.
[4]
Duncan, J. P., Aubele-Futch, T., & McGrath, M. (2019). A Fast-Slow Dynamical System Model of Addiction: Predicting Relapse Frequency. SIAMJournalonAppliedDynamicalSystems,18, 881-903. https://doi.org/10.1137/18m121410x
[5]
Glasner-Edwards, S., & Rawson, R. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Addiction Treatment: Review and Recommendations for Public Policy. HealthPolicy,97, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013
[6]
Henden, E. (2013). Addictive Actions. PhilosophicalPsychology,26, 362-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.660688
[7]
Henden, E., Melberg, H. O., & Røgeberg, O. J. (2013). Addiction: Choice or Compulsion? FrontiersinPsychiatry,4, Article 77. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00077
[8]
Kolmogorov, A. N., & Piskunov, N. S. (2019). Studies of the Diffusion with the Increasing Quantity of the Substance; Its Application to a Biological Problem. In O. A. Oleinik (Ed.), I.G.PetrowskySelectedWorks (pp. 106-132). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367810504-7
[9]
Lefschetz, S. (2016). Lectureson Differential Equations.(AM-14). Princeton University Press.
[10]
Li, J., & Wu, K. (2024). Bifurcation Analysis of a Synthetic Drugs Model Affected by Multiple Factors. Chaos,Solitons&Fractals,178, Article 114400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114400
[11]
Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2016). Epidemic Dynamics on a Delayed Multi-Group Heroin Epidemic Model with Nonlinear Incidence Rate. JournalofNonlinearSciencesandApplications,9, 2149-2160. https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.009.05.20
[12]
Ma, M., Liu, S., & Li, J. (2017). Bifurcation of a Heroin Model with Nonlinear Incidence Rate. NonlinearDynamics,88, 555-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3260-9
[13]
Ma, M., Liu, S., Xiang, H., & Li, J. (2018). Dynamics of Synthetic Drugs Transmission Model with Psychological Addicts and General Incidence Rate. PhysicaA:StatisticalMechanicsand Its Applications,491, 641-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.128
[14]
Miljkovic, D. (2020). Nonconvex Consumer Preferences, Compulsive Eating, and Food Addiction. BritishFoodJournal,123, 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-01-2020-0035
[15]
Miljkovic, D., Nganje, W., & de Chastenet, H. (2008). Economic Factors Affecting the Increase in Obesity in the United States: Differential Response to Price. FoodPolicy,33, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.05.003
[16]
Mulone, G., & Straughan, B. (2009). A Note on Heroin Epidemics. MathematicalBiosciences,218, 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2009.01.006
[17]
Nemytskii, V. V. (2015). Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations (Vol. 2083). Princeton University Press.
[18]
Nyabadza, F., Njagarah, J. B. H., & Smith, R. J. (2013). Modelling the Dynamics of Crystal Meth (‘Tik’) Abuse in the Presence of Drug-Supply Chains in South Africa. BulletinofMathematicalBiology,75, 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9790-5
[19]
Ramzan, S., Zanib, S. A., Shah, M. A., Abbas, N., & Shatanawi, W. (2024). On Bifurcation Analysis and Numerical Investigation of Alcohol Consumption Dynamics. ModernPhysicsLettersB. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021798492550040x
[20]
Rosser, J. B. (2013). From Catastrophe to Chaos: A General Theory of Economic Discontinuities. Springer Science & Business Media.
[21]
Sharma, A., & Misra, A. K. (2015). Backward Bifurcation in a Smoking Cessation Model with Media Campaigns. AppliedMathematicalModelling,39, 1087-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.022