全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Iowa Car Crop: A Critical View of the Trade Efficiency and the Role of Protectionism

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2025.132038, PP. 735-748

Keywords: Comparative Advantage, Absolute Advantage, Protectionism, Iowa Car Crop, Tariffs, Quotas, Subsidies, International Trade, Trade Efficiency, Economic Policy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

David Friedman’s Iowa Car thought that experiment challenges modern perceptions of production and international trade by showing how growing wheat can, in economic sense function as technology for car manufacturing in international trade. When a country exports wheat and import cars, it effectively transforms its agricultural surplus into industrial products through greater efficiency than domestic production. This classical view raises a critical question on the trade barriers imposed by government like tariffs and quotas that limit this process, resulting in inefficacy in resource allocation by producers. This article explores why Smith’s absolute advantage and Friedman’s comparative advantage are too simplistic to capture the complex realities of international trade. It focuses particularly on the rationale for the government-imposed trade barriers such as tariffs and quotas that force producers to be more wasteful and less efficient. It argues that trade barriers prioritize political, environmental and social concerns over the overall economic efficiency resulting to suboptimal results for consumers and producers in the international trade. The discussion recommends a more comprehensive framework through the dynamic comparative advantage and strategic trade theory.

References

[1]  Andrew Carter (2015). Rhino Poaching and the Illegal Wildlife Trade: A Global Perspective. Environmental Law Review, 15, 25.
[2]  Biagini, L., Antonioli, F., & Severini, S. (2023). The Impact of CAP Subsidies on the Productivity of Cereal Farms in Six European Countries: A Historical Perspective (2008-2018). Food Policy, 119, Article 102473.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102473
[3]  BMW Group (n.d.). BMW Global Production Network: Locations.
https://www.bmwgroup.com/en/company/locations.html
[4]  Brander, J. A., & Spencer, B. J. (1981). Tariffs and the Extraction of Foreign Monopoly Rents under Potential Entry. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 14, 371-389.
https://doi.org/10.2307/134894
[5]  Chaudhuri, S. (1996). Government and Economic Development in South Korea, 1961-79. Social Scientist, 24, 18-35.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3520100
[6]  Columbia Law School (2022). International Trade Law: Research Guide.
https://guides.law.columbia.edu/c.php?g=1221777&p=8949905
[7]  DePersio, G. (2022). Command Economy: Advantages and Disadvantages.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032515/what-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-command-economy.asp
[8]  Executive Order 14068 (2022). Prohibiting Certain Imports, Exports, and New Investment with Respect to Continued Russian Federation Aggression.
[9]  Fan, Y., Ren, S., Cai, H., & Cui, X. (2014). The State’s Role and Position in International Trade: A Complex Network Perspective. Economic Modelling, 39, 71-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.027
[10]  FAO (2022). The Cotton-4 (C-4) Countries in the Context of the Global Cotton Market: Situation and Short-and Medium-Term Outlook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[11]  Financial Times (2024). Chinese Businesses Target Vietnam and Mexico as Trade Tensions with US Rise.
https://www.ft.com/content/ede919f5-0d3e-43e5-8ef9-407a17551bb9
[12]  Gholz, E. (2019). Market Structure and Economic Sanctions: The 2010 Rare Earth Elements Episode as a Pathway Case of Market Adjustment. ND International Security Center.
https://ndisc.nd.edu/news-media/news/article-market-structure-and-economic-sanctions-the-2010-rare-earth-elements-episode-as-a-pathway-case-of-market-adjustment/
[13]  Hopewell, K. (2024). Global Power Shifts and the Cotton Subsidy Problem: How Emerging Powers Became the New Kings of Cotton Subsidies. Global Studies Quarterly, 4, ksae012.
https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae012
[14]  ICAC (2022). Production and Trade Subsidies Affecting the Cotton Industry. International Cotton Advisory Committee.
[15]  International Monetary Fund (1988). The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community: Principles and Consequences.
https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/book/9781557750365/ch001.xml
[16]  Kim, H. (2023). Its Worse than You Think: On the Consequences of the Chip Wars for US Semiconductor Production.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4966801
[17]  Kindleberger, C. (1978). Government and International Trade. Essays in International Finance, No. 129, 1-17.
https://ies.princeton.edu/pdf/E129.pdf
[18]  Maculan, A. M. (2013). Embraer and the Growth of the Brazilian Aircraft Industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 7, 41-59.
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtg.2013.052030
[19]  Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin, A. (2024). Impacts of the CBAM on EU Trade Partners: Consequences for Developing Countries. Climate Policy, 24, 243-259.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
[20]  Morgan, S. (2022). Retaliatory Tariffs Reduced U.S. States Exports of Agricultural Commodities. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2022/march/retaliatory-tariffs-reduced-u-s-states-exports-of-agricultural-commodities
[21]  Nauru v. Australia (Judgment) (1992). ICJ Rep 240.
https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-certain-phosphate-lands-in-nauru-nauru-v-australia-judgment-preliminary-objections-friday-26th-june-1992
[22]  O’Neill A. (2024). South Korea: Employment by Economic Sector 2020.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/604702/employment-by-economic-sector-in-south-korea/
[23]  Örgün, B. O. (2012). Strategic Trade Policy versus Free Trade. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1283-1292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1111
[24]  Soprano, C. (2014). A Step Toward Formalization: The Charter for Cross-Border Traders. World Bank Blogs.
https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/trade/step-toward-formalization-charter-cross-border-traders
[25]  Spencer, B. J., & Brander, J. A. (1983). International R & D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy. The Review of Economic Studies, 50, 707-722.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297771
[26]  UNCTAD (2013). Non-Tariff Measures to Trade: Economic and Policy Issues for Developing Countries.
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctab20121_en.pdf
[27]  Volkswagen Group (n.d.). Volkswagen Group Production Locations. Volkswagen Newsroom.
https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/production-and-locations-3695
[28]  Whitman, M. N. (1977). Sustaining the International Economic System: Issues for U.S. Policy. Essays in International Finance, No. 121, 1-54.
https://ies.princeton.edu/pdf/E121.pdf
[29]  World Bank (2016). The Changing Dynamics of Skilled Migration and ITS Implications for Development. Policy Research Working Paper No. 7852.
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/793861475694096298/pdf/WPS7852.pdf
[30]  World Trade Organization (2011). Address by WTO Director-General.
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl194_e.htm
[31]  Zhu, J. (2022). Exclusive: China Readying $143 Billion Package for Its Chip Firms in the Face of U.S. Curbs. Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/technology/china-plans-over-143-bln-push-boost-domestic-chips-compete-with-us-sources-2022-12-13

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133