|
问题银行的处置方式研究——以包商银行为例
|
Abstract:
近年来,我国中小商业银行的规模和市场份额均得到了提升,但由于存在缺乏资金补充、公司治理失灵等方面的问题,银行的信用风险日益增大。包商银行是第一家以行政接管形式处置、从市场中退出的商业银行,研究包商银行处置方式对于健全和完善我国的问题金融机构处置机制、深化金融改革都具有积极的意义。本文从信用风险、流动性风险、操作风险三个层面,对包商银行信用危机的原因和表现进行了分析。从行政接管、收购承接、破产清算三个层次对包商银行的处置进行了剖析,并对其总体处置效果进行了评价,就时机选择、行政参与等问题提出了一些改进意见。
In recent years, the scale and market share of small and medium-sized commercial banks have increased, but the problems of lack of capital replenishment and corporate governance have led to the expansion of credit risks of banks. Baoshang Bank is the first commercial bank to be disposed of in the form of administrative receivership and withdrawn from the market. Studying the disposal of Baoshang Bank is of positive significance to improve and perfect the disposal mechanism of problematic financial institutions in China and deepen financial reform. This paper analyzes the causes of Baoshang Bank’s credit crisis in terms of credit risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk, reviews and summarizes the disposal methods of Baoshang Bank in terms of administrative receivership, acquisition and undertaking, and bankruptcy and liquidation, evaluates the overall disposal effect, and makes suggestions for improvement in terms of timing and administrative participation.
[1] | 许戈雷特. 重构我国金融机构风险处置和市场退出机制之进路[J]. 金融法苑, 2024(2): 30-48. |
[2] | 安启雷, 陈超. 金融机构市场退出机制的国际比较与我国的制度选择[J]. 金融研究, 2003(10): 98-107. |
[3] | 原晓惠, 熊启跃. 问题银行治理的国际经验与中国改革路径研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2020(3): 99-114 |
[4] | 黄韬. 日本存款保险法律制度的实践及其评价[J]. 日本学刊, 2009(6): 82-93+159. |
[5] | 徐明东, 陈学彬. 货币环境、资本充足率与商业银行风险承担[J]. 金融研究, 2012(7): 489+50-62. |
[6] | 马骏, 施康, 王红林, 等. 利率传导机制的动态研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016(1): 31-49. |
[7] | 步艳红, 赵晓敏, 杨帆. 我国商业银行同业业务高杠杆化的模式、影响和监管研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2014(2): 33-46. |
[8] | 何德旭, 吴伯磊. 最后贷款人制度: 设计原则与改进措施[J]. 金融评论, 2011, 3(2): 54-63+124. |