全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

20世纪西方话语理论探究——从索绪尔到拉克劳、墨菲
Exploration of Western Discourse Theory in the 20th Century—From Saussure to Laclau and Murphy

DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.141050, PP. 312-318

Keywords: 西方话语理论,言语到话语,索绪尔,巴赫金,福柯,哈贝马斯,拉克劳和墨菲
Western Discourse Theory
, Speech to Discourse, Saussure, Bakhtin, Foucault, Habermas, Laclau and Murphy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

20世纪以来,由著名语言学家索绪尔提出的结构主义语言学理论发展至由巴赫金得出的超语言学理论,语言学由过去的系统以及抽象的探讨逐渐朝认知以及具体的探讨方向进行转变。实现了从语言到话语的转变。随后,在“语言学转向”背景下,哲学重心由研究本体论和形而上学转向探讨语言与人类思维、现实世界之间的复杂关系的语言哲学,由此话语逐渐走向开放,与社会、权力、霸权等现实社会不同方面相互交织的复杂关系。法国哲学家米歇尔·福柯则通过话语权力理论揭示了话语与权力之间的紧密联系,挑战了传统的主体观念。德国社会学家尤尔根·哈贝马斯则提出了交往行为理论,强调通过对话达成共识的重要性,进一步丰富了话语理论的内涵。随着资本主义生产方式的不断演变和社会结构的复杂化,传统的阶级分析方法面临着越来越多的挑战。在这一背景下,拉克劳和墨菲作为后马克思主义的重要代表人物,提出了话语霸权构建的理论转变,为理解当代社会的主体构建提供了新的视角。本文第一部分主要通过巴赫金话语与行为理论对索绪尔的语言学理论的继承与不同,表明了从语言到话语的转变过程。第二部分则阐述在20世纪“语言学转向”背景下,话语逐渐与现实社会因素相互交织影响。
In the 20th century, from the structuralist linguistic theory proposed by the famous linguist Saussure to the super-linguistic theory derived by Bakhtin, linguistics has gradually shifted from a systematic and abstract approach to a cognitive and concrete approach. The shift from language to discourse was realized. Subsequently, in the context of the “linguistic turn”, the center of philosophical gravity shifted from the study of ontology and metaphysics to the philosophy of language, which explores the complex relationship between language, human thinking, and the real world, and as a result, the discourse has gradually become open to the complex intertwining of different aspects of the real society, such as society, power, hegemony, and so on. French philosopher Michel Foucault, on the other hand, revealed the close connection between discourse and power through the theory of discursive power, challenging the traditional concept of the subject. German sociologist Jürgen Habermas, on the other hand, put forward the theory of interactional behavior, emphasizing the importance of reaching consensus through dialogue, further enriching the connotation of discourse theory. With the continuous evolution of the capitalist mode of production and the complication of social structure, the traditional method of class analysis faces more and more challenges. Against this background, Laclau and Murphy, as important representatives of post-Marxism, have proposed a theoretical shift in the construction of discursive hegemony, which provides a new perspective for understanding the construction of the subject in contemporary society. The first part of this paper shows the process of transformation from language to discourse mainly through the inheritance and difference of Bakhtin’s theory of discourse and behavior to Saussure’s linguistic theory. The second part of the paper explains that in the context of the

References

[1]  张玲. 浅谈索绪尔的语言与言语理论[J]. 青年文学家, 2014(20): 155.
[2]  朱小英. 索绪尔的语言与言语区分理论评析[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2010(11): 140-141.
[3]  翟婷婷. 巴赫金对话交往理论初探[J]. 山西高等学校社会科学学报, 2009, 21(4): 26-29.
[4]  李婷. 福柯对话语、知识与权力关系的论述[J]. 和田师范专科学校学报, 2016, 35(6): 22-24.
[5]  李智. 从权力话语到话语权力——兼对福柯话语理论的一种哲学批判[J]. 新视野, 2017(2): 108-113.
[6]  张云超. 权力话语的另类表述[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南师范大学, 2005.
[7]  李佳楠. 论哈贝马斯的交往行为理论[J]. 法制博览, 2019(15): 282-283.
[8]  张昕. 哈贝马斯交往行为理论研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2017.
[9]  刘晗. 从巴赫金到哈贝马斯[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 2017: 243.
[10]  葛瑶. 从拉克劳与墨菲的主体理论看现代社会中的主体[J]. 大连干部学刊, 2022, 38(6): 32-37.
[11]  陆欢欢. 对拉克劳、墨菲的新霸权主义理论的反思和批判[J]. 学理论, 2019(12): 66-68.
[12]  冯燕芳. 从卢森堡的自发性到拉克劳和墨菲的领导权[J]. 广西社会科学, 2019(6): 96-101.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133