This research work is an extension of the study carried out on the physico-mechanical characterisation of aggregates used in the manufacture of standard concretes. The aim is to test the relevance and impact of the properties resulting from this characterisation in relation to the quality of the concretes formulated, using statistical normality tests. This research work reports on the statistical analyses of the physico-mechanical properties of concretes formulated using the Dreux-Gorisse method. The study is based on the development of eight (8) formulations of concrete obtained from different materials taken from the localities of Brazzaville and Pointe-Noire. To do this, in order to develop an optimal concrete formulation approach taking into account its microstructural and compactness matrix, a good granular distribution was considered using two types of sand (rolled and crushed) for the correction of rolled type sands with the variable proportions (from 30% to 50%) of crushed sands. Eight (8) formulations of the concretes were studied according to the Dreux-Gorisse method, and only six (6) formulations gave the expected results. This statistical study is part of the context of understanding the crucial parameters, the distribution of values and the variabilities of the measured properties, in particular the average, which provides an overview of the central value for each property and allows the data to be summarized into a representative indicator of the average performance of the concrete. As a result, the results suggest that the resistances of the two groups of results (7 days and 28 days of age) are significantly different, so the null hypothesis is rejected. In other words, the differences observed between the means of resistance at 7 days of age (20.40 MPa) and at 28 days of age (27.80 MPa) could not be due to chance, which corresponds well to a C25/30 concrete. Thus, two tests were performed: the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Wilcoxon test. The first, just as specific, made it possible to know if the data collected followed the normal distribution, while the second, which is a non-parametric test, made it possible to test the data when they do not follow the normal distribution. For this, the use of Q-Q plots was essential and made it possible to visualize normality. On the six properties of concrete, namely strength, theoretical density, real density, gravel/sand ratio, subsidence and water/cement ratio, the Shapiro-Wilk test made it possible to verify and highlight the normality of the distributions. Indeed, only four properties whose data
References
[1]
Makela, J.B. (2016) Approche de solution pour une formulation efficiente de béton pour fc28 comprise entre 20 et 25 Mpa dans les secteurs informels et semi-informels de la construction. Cas de la ville de Brazzaville. Mémoire d’ingénieur, École Nationale Supérieure Polytechnique, Université Marien Ngouabi.
[2]
Makela, J.B., Ebata, N.B., Malanda, N. and Mbeke, S.K. (2024) Prospective Study and Physico-Mechanical Characterisation of Granular Materials Used in the Manufacture of Ordinary Concrete in Congo. Higher Institute of Architecture, Building Planning and Public Works, Denis Sassou Nguesso University, Kintélé, Republic of the Congo.
[3]
Aly, T., Sanjayan, J.G. and Collins, F. (2008) Effect of Polypropylene Fibers on Shrinkage and Cracking of Concretes. MaterialsandStructures, 41, 1741-1753. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9361-2
[4]
Le Guen, M. (2002) La boite a moustaches pour sensibiliser a la statistique. BulletinofSociologicalMethodology/BulletindeMéthodologieSociologique, 73, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630207300106
[5]
McGill, R., Tukey, J.W. and Larsen, W.A. (1978) Variations of Box Plots. TheAmericanStatistician, 32, 12-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683468
[6]
Rochim, A.F. (2016) Specific (Numerical) and Graphical Statistic Testing Methods (Literature Review). Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Indonesia.
[7]
Savage, R. (1968) Nonparametric Statistics. University of Minnesota Minneapolis.
[8]
Gelman, A. and Stern, H. (2006) The Difference between “Significant” and “Not Significant” Is Not Itself Statistically Significant. TheAmericanStatistician, 60, 328-331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006x152649
[9]
Kumar, R. (2022) Interpretation of Different Parametric and Non-Parametric Statistics and Their Importance in Research. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 10, 23-27.
[10]
Mursadin, A. (2020) The Use of Nonparametric Statistical Inference for Studying the Effects of Construction Waste. Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Engineering Faculty, Lambung Mangkurat University.
[11]
Dreux, G. (1983) Nouveau Guide Du Béton. Quatrième édition (Revue et Corrigée), EYROLLES.
[12]
Malanda, N., Louzolo-Kimbembe, P., Ahouet, L., Makela, J.B. and Mouengue, G. (2019) Concrete Formulation Study for Informal and Semi-Informal Construction Sectors. OpenJournalofCivilEngineering, 9, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.91005
[13]
Tiegoum Wembe, J., Mambou Ngueyep, L.L., Elat Assoua Moukete, E., Eslami, J., Pliya, P., Ndjaka, J.B., etal. (2023) Physical, Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Concretes Made with Natural and Crushed Aggregates: Application in Building Construction. CleanerMaterials, 7, Article 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2023.100173
[14]
Chlass, N. and Krüger, J.J. (2007) Small Sample Properties of the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with Discontinuous and Dependent Observations. Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2007,032, Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena.