全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于非参数性检验定量分析法对华北板块东南缘寿县组碎屑锆石源区对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Detrital Zircon Source Areas of Shouxian Formation at the Southeastern Margin of the North China Plate Based on the Nonparametric Test Quantitative Analysis Method

DOI: 10.12677/me.2025.131022, PP. 178-189

Keywords: 寿县组,粒度分析,沉积环境,沉积物源,基于非参数性检验的定量分析法(K-S检验)
Shouxian Formation
, Grain Size Analysis, Sedimentary Environment, Sediment Provenance, Quantitative Analysis Based on Nonparametric Tests (K-S Tests)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

华北板块东南缘淮南地区在淮南、霍邱、凤阳等地在晚前寒武纪形成一套完整的海相碎屑岩和碳酸盐岩沉积盖层。八公山群寿县组主要为一套浅灰色含钙质石英细砂–粉砂岩。为探讨寿县组地层沉积物源从而采集寿县组出露区未风化新鲜岩石样品,本文对其进行岩石学特征分析并制成显微薄片在正交偏光显微镜下对其进行粒度分析,结合萨胡(Sahu)判别函数结果和概率累计曲线图特征,认为寿县组碎屑岩分选好,磨圆一般,沉积环境为浅海–临滨带的陆棚沉积环境。在收集前人碎屑锆石年龄并结合淮南周边地区基性侵入岩的定年结果后,将八公山群寿县组沉积时限限定在1.0~0.95 Ga之间。基于非参数性检验的定量分析法(K-S检验)验证不同地区的物源区差异性,并生成年龄累计曲线图,对比华北克拉通中–新元古代时期裂谷岩浆活动及其东部各区域出现的碎屑锆石年龄,判断淮南地区寿县组沉积物源可能为劳伦古大陆造山带,是否来自华北克拉通内部仍然需要进一步研究。
A complete set of Marine clastic rock and carbonate sedimentary cover was formed in Huainan, Huoqiu and Fengyang in the southeast of North China Craton during the late Precambrian period. The Shouxian Formation of Bagongshan Group is mainly a set of light gray calcareous quartz fine sand-siltstone. In order to explore the source of sediments in the Shouxian Formation and collect samples of unweathered fresh rocks from the outcrop area of the Shouxian Formation, this paper analyzes their petrology characteristics and makes microslices, analyzes their particle size under the orthogonal polarization microscope, and combines the results of Sahu discriminant function and the characteristics of probability accumulation curve, which suggests that the clastic rocks of the Shouxian Formation are well sorted and generally rounded. The sedimentary environment is shelf sedimentary environment in shallow sea-coastal zone. Based on the dating of former detrital zircons and the dating of basic intrusive rocks in Huainan area, the deposition time of Shouxian Formation in Bagongshan Group is limited to 1.0~0.95 Ga. The quantitative analysis based on non-parametric test (K-S test) verifies the provenance differences in different regions, and generates a cumulative age curve. By comparing the Mesoproterozoic rifting magmatic activity in the North China Craton and the ages of detrital zircons in various eastern regions, it is concluded that the sediment source of Shouxian Formation in Huainan area may be Laurentian orogenic belt. Whether it comes from within the North China Craton still needs further study.

References

[1]  朱日祥, 朱光, 李建威. 华北克拉通破坏[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
[2]  官玉龙, 罗顺社, 周庆安. 淮南地区淮南群沉积特征和层序地层[J]. 当代化工, 2020, 49(2): 476-479.
[3]  杨清和, 张友礼, 郑文武, 等. 苏皖北部震旦亚界的划分与对比[M]//中国震旦亚界. 天津: 天津科学技术出社, 1980: 231-265.
[4]  徐嘉炜. 华北南部寒武系下限问题[J]. 地质评论, 1958, 18(1): 41-56.
[5]  杨志坚. 淮南、霍邱早寒武世沉积若干问题的探讨[J]. 地质科学, 1960, 3(4): 182-188.
[6]  郑文武. “淮南生物群”的主要特征及其在地层研究中的意义[J]. 合肥工业大学学报, 1979, 14(2): 97-108.
[7]  汪贵翔, 张世恩, 李尚湘, 等. 苏皖北部上前寒武系研究[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1984, 73-84.
[8]  Li, Z., Ma, X., An, W., Mitchell, R.N., Li, Q., Lan, Z., et al. (2023) Provenance Transition of the Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic Xuhuai Basin: Constraining the Accretion of the Northern Qinling Terrane with the North China Craton. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 251, Article ID: 105675.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105675
[9]  Sun, F., Peng, P., Zhou, X., Magalhães, A.J.C., Guadagnin, F., Zhou, X., et al. (2020) Provenance Analysis of the Late Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic Xuhuai Basin in the Southeast North China Craton: Implications for Paleogeographic Reconstruction. Precambrian Research, 337, Article ID: 105554.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105554
[10]  Zhao, H., Zhang, S., Ding, J., Chang, L., Ren, Q., Li, H., et al. (2019) New Geochronologic and Paleomagnetic Results from Early Neoproterozoic Mafic Sills and Late Mesoproterozoic to Early Neoproterozoic Successions in the Eastern North China Craton, and Implications for the Reconstruction of Rodinia. GSA Bulletin, 132, 739-766.
https://doi.org/10.1130/b35198.1
[11]  李光金, 王霄鹏, 孙云鹏, 等. 淮南地区中-新元古界LA-ICP-MS碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄及地质意义[J]. 地层学杂志, 2021, 45(2): 115-141.
[12]  安徽省地质矿产局. 安徽省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987.
[13]  安徽省地质矿产局. 安徽省岩石地层[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1997.
[14]  朱筱敏. 沉积岩石学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008.
[15]  李敏, 李双应, 李振生, 等. 合肥盆地下白垩统朱巷组沉积相与油气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地质学, 2018, 29(11): 1608-1618.
[16]  左鹏飞, 李雨, 郑德顺, 等. 豫西渑池地区中元古界兵马沟组沉积环境分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3): 70-80.
[17]  Siiro, P., Räsänen, M.E., Gingras, M.K., et al. (2005) Application of Laser Diffraction Grain Size Analysis to Reveal Depositional Processes in Tidally Influenced Systems. Special Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists, 35, 159-180.
[18]  Basanta K. Sahu, (1964) Depositional Mechanisms from the Size Analysis of Clastic Sediments. SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research, 34, 73-83.
https://doi.org/10.1306/74d70fce-2b21-11d7-8648000102c1865d
[19]  庞科, 唐卿, 万斌, 等. 华北地台胶辽徐淮地区中-新元古代地层研究进展[J]. 地层学杂志, 2021, 45(4): 467-492.
[20]  Li, Z., Ma, X., Li, S., An, W., Li, Q., Dong, Y., et al. (2023) Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic Chronostratigraphic Framework and Provenance Analysis in the Southeastern North China Craton and Its Tectonic Significance. Geological Journal, 58, 3096-3120.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4754
[21]  Li, Z., Dong, Y., An, W., Mitchell, R.N., Lan, Z., Wang, D., et al. (2024) The Late Stenian and Late Tonian Provenance Transitions in the Northern Xuhuai Basin: Implications for the Precambrian Evolution of the Southeastern North China Craton. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 264, Article ID: 106070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2024.106070
[22]  Zhao, H., Zhang, S., Ren, W., Ding, J., Yang, K., Li, H., et al. (2022) New Paleomagnetic Results from the Ca. 1.0 Ga Jiayuan Formation of the Huaibei Group in the North China Craton, and Their Paleogeographic Implications. Precambrian Research, 379, Article ID: 106807.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106807
[23]  郭佩, 刘池洋, 王建强, 等. 碎屑锆石年代学在沉积物源研究中的应用及存在问题[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(1): 46-56.
[24]  Henrique-Pinto, R., Guilmette, C., Bilodeau, C. and McNicoll, V. (2017) Evidence for Transition from a Continental Forearc to a Collisional Pro-Foreland Basin in the Eastern Trans-Hudson Orogen: Detrital Zircon Provenance Analysis in the Labrador Trough, Canada. Precambrian Research, 296, 181-194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.04.035
[25]  Fedo, C.M. (2003) Detrital Zircon Analysis of the Sedimentary Record. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 53, 277-303.
https://doi.org/10.2113/0530277
[26]  李振生, 贾超, 赵卓娅, 等. 华北克拉通南缘栾川群的形成时代、物源及其对区域构造演化的意义: 锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素制约[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(4): 1046-1066.
[27]  George, G. (2012) Detrital Zircon U-Pb Geochronology: Current Methods and New Opportunities. In: Busby, C.J. and Ingersoll, R.V., Eds., Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins, John Wiley & Sons, 45-62.
[28]  Ludwig, K.R. (2003) User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center, 1-70.
[29]  Zhao, G. and Zhai, M. (2013) Lithotectonic Elements of Precambrian Basement in the North China Craton: Review and Tectonic Implications. Gondwana Research, 23, 1207-1240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.08.016
[30]  Li, Y., Zhu, G., Gu, C., Su, N., Xiao, S., Zhang, S., et al. (2018) Structural Evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-North China Orogen: Evidence from the Xiaoqinling Region, Central China. Precambrian Research, 316, 244-274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.08.020
[31]  Wan, Y., Dong, C., Wang, W., Xie, H. and Liu, D. (2010) Archean Basement and a Paleoproterozoic Collision Orogen in the Huoqiu Area at the Southeastern Margin of North China Craton: Evidence from Sensitive High Resolution Ion Micro‐Probe U‐Pb Zircon Geochronology. Acta Geologica SinicaEnglish Edition, 84, 91-104.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00173.x
[32]  杨晓勇, 王波华, 杜贞保, 等. 论华北克拉通南缘霍邱群变质作用、形成时代及霍邱BIF铁矿成矿机制[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(11): 3476-3496.
[33]  Wang, Q., Zheng, J., Pan, Y., Dong, Y., Liao, F., Zhang, Y., et al. (2014) Archean Crustal Evolution in the Southeastern North China Craton: New Data from the Huoqiu Complex. Precambrian Research, 255, 294-315.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.10.005
[34]  Liu, L., Yang, X., Santosh, M. and Aulbach, S. (2015) Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic Continental Growth in the Southeastern Margin of the North China Craton: Geochemical, Zircon U-Pb and Hf Isotope Evidence from the Huoqiu Complex. Gondwana Research, 28, 1002-1018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.08.011
[35]  聂峰, 张忠宝, 石永红, 等. 郯庐断裂(安徽段)两侧肥东群与霍邱群特征性岩石对比研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(4): 1087-1100.
[36]  许文良, 杨德彬, 裴福萍, 等. 蚌埠隆起区五河群的形成时代: 锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年证据[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(1): 132-137.
[37]  杨德彬, 许文良, 裴福萍, 等. 蚌埠隆起区古元古代钾长花岗岩的成因: 岩石地球化学、锆石U-Pb年代学与Hf同位素的制约[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2009, 34(1): 148-164.
[38]  郭素淑, 李曙光. 华北克拉通东南缘古元古代变质和岩浆事件的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄[J]. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2009, 39(6): 694-699.
[39]  Liu, Y.C., Wang, A.D., Rolfo, F., Groppo, C., Gu, X.F. and Song, B. (2009) Geochronological and Petrological Constraints on Palaeoproterozoic Granulite Facies Metamorphism in Southeastern Margin of the North China Craton. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 27, 125-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2008.00810.x
[40]  聂峰, 石永红, 张忠宝, 等. 安徽北部郯庐断裂两侧基底岩石年龄及对郯庐断裂初始开启时间的限定[J]. 科学通报, 2015, 60(24): 2315-2326.
[41]  Liu, C., Zhao, G., Liu, F. and Cai, J. (2018) The Southwestern Extension of the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt in the North China Craton: Geochronological and Geochemical Evidence from the Wuhe Group in the Bengbu Area. Lithos, 304, 258-279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2018.01.021
[42]  旷红伟, 柳永清, 耿元生, 等. 中国中-新元古代地层研究进展及建议划分、对比方案[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(12): 3861-3901.
[43]  赵太平, 翟明国, 夏斌, 等. 熊耳群火山岩锆石SHRIMP年代学研究: 对华北克拉通盖层发育初始时间的制约[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(22): 2342-2349.
[44]  朴贤旭, 翟明国, 杨正赫, 等. 朝鲜半岛平南盆地中元古代岩浆事件[J]. 岩石学报, 2016b, 32(10): 3033-3044.
[45]  杨正赫, 彭澎, 郑哲寿, 等. 朝鲜平南盆地古元古界-下古生界沉积岩碎屑锆石年龄谱对比及意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(10): 3155-3179.
[46]  朴贤旭, 翟明国, 杨正赫, 等. 朝鲜平南盆地祥原超群的沉积时代与拉伸纪早期碳同位素负漂移[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(7): 2181-2195.
[47]  吴昊. 辽宁本溪新元古界上部沉积学特征及构造属性[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2018.
[48]  陆松年, 相振群, 李怀坤, 等. 华北克拉通对罗迪尼亚超大陆事件的响应——GOSEN连接假设[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(9): 1396-1406.
[49]  Sun, F., Peng, P., Zheng, D. and Zuo, P. (2022) Reappraising the Provenance of Early Neoproterozoic Strata in the Southern-Southeastern North China Craton and Its Implication for Paleogeographic Reconstruction. Minerals, 12, Article 510.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050510
[50]  彭澎, 胡波, 张志越, 等. 朝鲜半岛平南盆地地质演化综述[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(1): 129-142.
[51]  Wu, Z., Lu, C., Qiu, L., Zhao, H., Wang, H., Tan, W., et al. (2022) New Detrital Zircon Geochronological Results from the Meso-Neoproterozoic Sandstones in the Southern-Eastern Liaoning Region, North China Craton, and Their Paleogeographic Implications. Precambrian Research, 381, Article ID: 106847.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106847

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133