全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

哈尔滨地区生境质量与景观格局的时空演变及空间关联分析
Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Spatial Correlation Analysis of Habitat Quality and Landscape Pattern in Harbin Region

DOI: 10.12677/aep.2025.151017, PP. 129-141

Keywords: 生境质量,景观格局指数,哈尔滨地区,空间自相关,土地利用变化
Habitat Quality
, Landscape Pattern Indices, Harbin Region, Spatial Autocorrelation, Land Use Change

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

近年来城市化快速推进,致使景观破碎、生境质量下降,然而哈尔滨地区却在经济发展与生态保护并行方面表现出色。为探究土地利用类型变化背景下景观格局与生境质量的时空演变及空间关联,为城市经济和生态环境高质量同步发展提供决策依据,本研究以哈尔滨地区为对象,运用2000年、2010年、2020年哈尔滨地区的土地利用类型数据,运用FRAGSTATS软件、InVEST模型以及空间自相关和热点分析方法,对哈尔滨地区的景观格局和生境质量状况进行量化评估,剖析其时空演变特征和空间关联情况,结合该地区生境质量与景观格局的空间分布,最终确定各类景观格局指数对生境质量的最优参考阈值区间。结论:1) 林地、耕地是哈尔滨地区主要土地利用类型,2000~2020年,林地、建设用地和未利用土地转入面积较多,建设用地与林地扩张时优先占用耕地。2) 哈尔滨地区生境质量呈“西部低,东部高”的空间分布特征,2000~2020年间整体有所提高,呈协同进步的时空动态特征。3) 哈尔滨地区景观格局在2000~2020年间较稳定,景观格局指数与生境质量有相关性,在3 km × 3 km格网尺度下,哈尔滨地区各景观格局指数的最优参考阈值区间为:CONTAG值不超过39.1,LPI值大于70.5%,PD控制在[0, 10.07]个/km2内,SHDI指数小于0.68,LSI指数控制在[1, 1.61],在此区间内,所有地类生境质量可保持生境质量理想状态。研究结果可为其他区域的生态环境管理提供参考。
In recent years, the rapid progress of urbanization has led to landscape fragmentation and a decline in habitat quality. However, the Harbin region has performed outstandingly in the parallel development of economic growth and ecological protection. To explore the spatio-temporal evolution and spatial correlation of the landscape pattern and habitat quality under the background of changes in land use types and provide a decision-making basis for the high-quality synchronous development of the urban economy and ecological environment, this study takes the Harbin region as the object. Using the land use type data of the Harbin region in 2000, 2010, and 2020, and applying the FRAGSTATS software, the InVEST model, as well as spatial autocorrelation and hot spot analysis methods, a quantitative assessment was conducted on the landscape pattern and habitat quality status in the Harbin region. Its spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and spatial correlation situations were analyzed. Combining the spatial distribution of habitat quality and landscape pattern in this region, the optimal reference threshold intervals of various landscape pattern indices for habitat quality were finally determined. Conclusions: 1) Woodland and cultivated land are the main land use types in the Harbin region. From 2000 to 2020, there was a relatively large area of transfer-in for woodland, construction land, and unused land. When construction land and woodland expanded, cultivated land was preferentially occupied. 2) The habitat quality in the Harbin region shows a spatial distribution characteristic of being “low in the west and high in the east”. Overall, it has improved from 2000 to 2020, presenting a spatio-temporal dynamic

References

[1]  张廷, 胡玉柱, 胡海辉, 等. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的哈尔滨市土地利用及生境质量预测[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(8): 4709-4721.
[2]  Song, S., Yu, D. and Li, X. (2023) Impacts of Changes in Climate and Landscape Pattern on Soil Conservation Services in a Dryland Landscape. Catena, 222, Article ID: 106869.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106869
[3]  刘永婷, 杨钊, 徐光来, 等. 基于MGWR模型的皖江城市带生境质量对城镇化的响应研究[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(2): 280-290.
[4]  杜峯屹, 陈松林, 蒲佳豪. 2000-2020年闽东南地区土地利用变化及生境质量时空演变[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(6): 345-356.
[5]  朱南燕. 海岸带城市景观格局的时空演变特征、生态网络构建及综合优化策略[D]: [博士学位论文]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2024.
[6]  谢莹. 基于Fragstats和InVEST模型彭州市景观格局与生境质量的时空演变及评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2021.
[7]  Hamere, Y., Teshome, S., Mekuria, A., et al. (2021) Impact of Landscape Pattern Changes on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in the Beressa Watershed of the Blue Nile Basin in Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment, 793, Article ID: 148559.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148559
[8]  贾路, 于坤霞, 李占斌, 等. 长江经济带景观格局对生态系统服务价值影响的概率评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(15): 217-227.
[9]  叶博文, 孙标, 赵云靓, 等. 2000~2022年内蒙古生境质量时空演变及驱动力分析[J/OL]. 环境科学: 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202407134, 2024-10-03.
[10]  石小伟, 冯广京, 苏培添, 等. 大都市郊区土地利用时空演变特征与生境质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(4): 275-284.
[11]  陈雅倩, 赵丽, 陶金源, 等. 基于InVEST模型的未利用土地开发前后生境质量评价——以唐县为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(7): 1093-1102.
[12]  曹妍, 张立亭, 张紫怡, 等. 赣州市生境质量及景观格局时空演变分析与预测[J]. 江西科学, 2024, 42(2): 332-339.
[13]  常玉旸, 高阳, 谢臻, 等. 京津冀地区生境质量与景观格局演变及关联性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2): 848-859.
[14]  李亚娇, 沈昞昕, 李家科, 等. 丹汉江流域生境质量对景观格局变化响应[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2022, 45(5): 206-216.
[15]  吴岚. 南北盘江流域景观格局与生境质量的响应及驱动因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2024.
[16]  王鹏宇. 基于GIS和Fragstats的青岩镇景观格局演变与生态网络优化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2023.
[17]  吴岚, 周忠发, 张露, 等. 喀斯特地区景观格局变化对生境质量的响应[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(9): 206-217.
[18]  廖凌云, 鲁贝, 曹越. 环武夷山国家公园景观格局与生境质量的时空动态变化及空间关联分析[J]. 中国园林, 2023, 39(12): 21-27.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133