|
基于击键追踪技术的读写综合测试的认知过程研究
|
Abstract:
本研究以英语专四读写综合测试为例,采用击键追踪技术对考生在完成任务过程中的写作停顿行为进行收集,同时采用刺激回忆访谈法,旨在明晰读写综合测试所引发的考生认知加工过程。结果表明:写作前期,考生主要经历推断、命题信息整合、意义构建、篇章构建等过程;写作中期,考生主要经历规划、选择、转译、组织和协同等过程;写作后期,考生主要经历监控等过程。
This study, taking the English majors (TEM4) reading-writing integrated test as an example, collects the writing pausing behaviors of one candidate during the task completion process using a keystroke logging system and conducts a stimulus recall interview to clarify the cognitive processing. The results show that during the writing preliminary stage, the candidate mainly goes through the processes of inference, topic information integration, meaning construction, and paragraph construction; during the writing middle stage, the candidate mainly goes through the processes of planning, selection, translation, organization, and coordination; during the writing final stage, the candidate mainly goes through the process of monitoring.
[1] | 缪海燕. 外语写作互动的语篇协同研究[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(5): 630-641. |
[2] | 张洁. 测试任务条件对读后续写思维过程的影响研究[J]. 外国语言文学, 2022, 39(5): 38-47, 134. |
[3] | 徐翠芹. 写作停顿视角下的中国英语学习者记叙文和议论文写作认知加工过程研究[J]. 外语教学, 2021, 42(1): 35-40. |
[4] | Khalifa, H. and Weir, C. J. (2009) Examining Reading: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Reading. Cambridge University Press. |
[5] | Shaw, S.D. and Weir. C. J. (2007) Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press. |
[6] | Plakans, L. (2008) Comparing Composing Processes in Writing-Only and Reading-to-Write Test Tasks. Assessing Writing, 13, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001 |
[7] | Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X.J., Kourtali, N.-E., Lee, M. and Borges, L. (2020) Investigating L2 Writing Processes across Independent and Integrated Tasks: A Mixed-Methods Study. Second Language Research, 36, 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501 |
[8] | Leijten, M. and Van Waes, L. (2013) Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Written Communication, 30, 358-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692 |