|
论侵犯公民个人信息罪“情节严重”的认定
|
Abstract:
侵犯公民个人信息罪以“情节严重”为定罪要件要素,对于情节严重的认定引发了刑法学界的争论与分歧。面对个人信息三级分类法的制度缺陷、以“组”代“条”的计算单位争议、批量信息举证与真伪核查的处理难题,本文通过剖析相关法律条文和司法解释,搜寻侵犯公民个人信息罪的现实案例,对调整信息三级分类规范,明确信息数量计算“识别性”标准及统一批量信息推定规则和信息处理模式等破解思路进行了集中阐述,以期进一步改善“情节严重”认定混乱的司法现状。
The crime of infringing personal information of citizens takes “severe circumstances” as an element of conviction, and the determination of severe circumstances has triggered debates and disagreements in the criminal law academic circle. In the face of the systematic defects of the three-level classification of personal information, the controversy over the calculation unit of “group” instead of “article”, and the difficulties in handling the proof and authenticity verification of bulk information, this paper, through analyzing relevant legal provisions and judicial interpretations, searches for real cases of crimes against citizens’ personal information, and focuses on such cracking ideas as adjusting the norms of three-level classification of information, clarifying the standard of “identifiability” for calculating the quantity of information, and unifying the rules of presumption of bulk information and the mode of information processing, with a view to improving the confusing judicial the current situation.
[1] | 储陈城. 大数据时代个人信息保护与利用的刑法立场转换——基于比较法视野的考察[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2019, 5(5): 48-62. |
[2] | 维克托∙迈尔-舍恩伯格, 肯尼斯∙库克耶. 大数据时代[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2013: 45. |
[3] | 刘宪权, 何阳阳. 《个人信息保护法》视角下侵犯公民个人信息罪要件的调整[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(1): 144-154. |
[4] | 周光权. 侵犯公民个人信息罪的行为对象[J]. 清华法学, 2021, 15(3): 25-40. |
[5] | 陈瑞华. 论刑事法中的推定[J]. 法学, 2015(5): 105-116. |