|
Finance 2025
我国商业银行绿色信贷经营风险的影响研究——基于绿色声誉机制
|
Abstract:
第六次金融工作会议中提出做好科技金融、绿色金融、普惠金融、养老金融、数字金融五篇大文章。绿色信贷作为绿色金融实践的主要手段,商业银行在绿色信贷的发展过程中也起到至关重要的作用,但也不可避免受到绿色信贷的影响。本文采用固定效应模型选取25家银行2012~2023年的数据进行实证分析,发现商业银行绿色信贷发展程度越高,商业银行风险水平越低。从作用机制上,绿色信贷可以通过增加银行绿色声誉形成勇于承担社会责任的正面形象,从而降低银行的风险。进一步分析来看,绿色信贷抑制银行风险的作用在不同类别银行上的显著性有所不同,在股份制银行的效果最为明显,国有银行和城市商业银行的影响效果较弱。
In the sixth Financial Work Conference, five major articles were proposed on science and technology finance, green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance and digital finance. As the main means of green finance practice, commercial banks also play a vital role in the development of green credit, but they are inevitably affected by green credit. In this paper, the data from 25 banks from 2012~2023 were selected for empirical analysis, and we found that there is a negative correlation between green credit and the risks of commercial banks. The higher the proportion of green credit business, the lower the risk level of commercial banks. From the mechanism of action, green credit can form a positive image of bravely taking on social responsibilities by increasing the green reputation of banks, thus reducing the risks of banks. Further analysis shows that the effect of green credit in suppressing bank risks gradually decreases in different types of banks, with the most obvious effect in joint-stock banks, while the effect of state-owned banks and urban commercial banks is weak.
[1] | 陈晓钟. 商业银行: 控制风险与金融创新并重[J]. 经济师, 2000(3): 68. |
[2] | 毛盛超. 商业银行经营风险的特点及控制[J]. 中国金融, 2001(5): 40-41. |
[3] | Gbanador, M.A. and Okeke, O. (2023) Effect of Green Banking Practice on the Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria: An Electronic Banking System Approach. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 29, 76-88. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2023/v29i91130 |
[4] | Finger, M., Gavious, I. and Manos, R. (2018) Environmental Risk Management and Financial Performance in the Banking Industry: A Cross-Country Comparison. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 52, 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.09.019 |
[5] | 张璐阳. 我国商业银行绿色信贷的创新与突破[J]. 武汉金融, 2010(5): 38-39. |
[6] | 张冲, 王军. “双碳”目标下商业银行的发展[J]. 中国金融, 2021(16): 47-48. |
[7] | Mathuva, D.M. (2016) Drivers of Financial and Social Disclosure by Savings and Credit Cooperatives in Kenya: A Managerial Perspective. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 4, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2016.08.001 |
[8] | 李程, 白唯, 王野, 李玉善. 绿色信贷政策如何被商业银行有效执行?——基于演化博弈论和DID模型的研究[J]. 南方金融, 2016(1): 47-54. |
[9] | 周再清, 甘易, 胡月. 商业银行同业资产特性与风险行为——基于中国银行业动态面板系统GMM的实证分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2017(7): 66-75. |
[10] | 马红梅, 金碧君. 绿色信贷对商业银行经营风险影响的动态分析——基于PVAR模型[J]. 中国物价, 2023(8): 117-120. |
[11] | 王宏涛, 曹文成, 王一鸣. 绿色金融政策与商业银行风险: 机理、特征与实证研究[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2022, 37(4): 143-160. |
[12] | 孙光林, 王颖, 李庆海. 绿色信贷对商业银行信贷风险的影响[J]. 金融论坛, 2017, 22(10): 31-40. |
[13] | 郭俊杰, 方颖. 绿色信贷、融资结构与企业环境投资[J]. 世界经济, 2022, 45(8): 57-80. |
[14] | 顾海峰, 卞雨晨. 绿色信贷能否缓解银行系统性风险——基于中国22家上市银行的证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, 42(11): 42-56. |
[15] | 张琳, 王宝东, 廉永辉. 绿色信贷如何影响银行风险?——基于中国银行业数据的实证研究[J]. 武汉金融, 2022(5): 3-13. |
[16] | 周晔, 王亚梅. 银行竞争、资产流动性与风险[J]. 国际金融研究, 2022(1): 62-71. |
[17] | 任辉. 环境保护、可持续发展与绿色金融体系构建[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2009(10): 85-88. |
[18] | 王修华, 刘娜. 我国绿色金融可持续发展的长效机制探索[J]. 理论探索, 2016(4): 99-105. |
[19] | Dinnie, K. (2003) Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image and Performance. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1144-1147. |
[20] | 蒋廉雄, 卢泰宏. 形象创造价值吗?——服务品牌形象对顾客价值-满意-忠诚关系的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2006(4): 106-114, 129. |
[21] | 皮天雷, 杨丽弘. 商业银行的操作风险、声誉效应与市场反应[J]. 国际金融研究, 2015(2): 77-87. |
[22] | 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620. |
[23] | 刘昊. 绿色信贷、风险管理文化与商业银行高质量发展[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021, 42(5): 2-8. |
[24] | 刘红霞, 李辰颖. 经理层声誉与薪酬关系研究——来自上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2011(5): 12-20. |