全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

WTO法视域下国际补贴规则的新动向与中国应对
The New Trend of International Subsidies Rules and China’s Response under the Perspective of WTO Law

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.111035, PP. 267-276

Keywords: 补贴规则,WTO改革,SCM协定,公共机构
Subsidy Rules
, WTO Reform, SCM Agreements, Public Institutions

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2001年启动的多哈回合谈判久拖不决,致使世界贸易组织(WTO)补贴规则未能进行有效革新,日益显现滞后性和不适应性。一些国家一边主张WTO补贴规则改革,一边推动国内补贴立法的更新,并积极将新补贴规则向多边贸易体系之外的区域性协定推广。国际补贴新规则呈现出新的时代特点和动向,对现有的WTO补贴规则构成了严峻挑战,其改革和完善成为国际经贸的热议和焦点问题。中国应积极参与这一改革进程,在国际层面坚定维护WTO多边贸易体制,推动改进SCM协定补贴规则,参与国际规则博弈,争取有利于我国的多边、区域补贴规则空间,在国内层面不断调整和完善我国补贴政策,推进和巩固国企改革成果,为国际补贴规则的发展贡献中国力量。
The prolonged delay in the Doha Round of negotiations launched in 2001 has resulted in the failure to effectively innovate the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules on subsidies, which have become increasingly outdated and maladaptive. Some countries advocate the reform of WTO subsidy rules while promoting the updating of domestic subsidy legislation and actively promoting the new subsidy rules to regional agreements outside the multilateral trading system. The new rules on international subsidies present new features and trends of the times, posing a serious challenge to the existing WTO subsidy rules, whose reform and improvement have become a hot topic of discussion and focus of international trade and economics. China should actively participate in this reform process, firmly safeguard the WTO multilateral trading system at the international level, promote the improvement of the subsidy rules of the SCM Agreement, participate in the international rules game, and strive for the space of the multilateral and regional subsidy rules that are favorable to China; at the domestic level, we should continuously adjust and improve our subsidy policy, promote and consolidate the achievements of the reform of state-owned enterprises, and contribute China’s strength to the development of the international subsidy rules.

References

[1]  U.S. Department of Commerce (2024) Biden-Harris Administration Opens Funding Competition for Up to $1.6 Billion to Accelerate U.S. Semiconductor Advanced Packaging Technologies.
https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2024/10/biden-harris-administration-opens-funding-competition-16-billion
[2]  The White House (2024) Fact Sheet: The United States Announces New Investments and Resources to Advance President Biden’s National Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Initiative.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/14/fact-sheet-the-united-states-announces-new-investments-and-resources-to-advance-president-bidens-national-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-initiative/
[3]  European Commission (2024) The Green Deal Industrial Plan: putting Europe’s Net-Zero Industry in the Lead.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_510
[4]  European Commission (2024) State Aid: Commission Adopts Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework to Further Support Transition towards Net-Zero Economy.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1563
[5]  中国政府网. 国务院关于印发新时期促进集成电路产业和软件产业高质量发展若干政策的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-08-04)
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-08/04/content_5532370.htm, 2024-11-25.
[6]  丁如. 美国芯片补贴“护栏条款”对中国的影响及应对建议[J]. 科技导报, 2024, 42(17): 28-40.
[7]  刘成, 苏畅. 保护主义再抬头——浅谈欧盟《外国补贴条例》歧视性执法和司法实践[EB/OL]. (2024-11-05)
https://www.ctils.com/articles/16422, 2024-11-25.
[8]  黎峰. 全球价值链分工视角下的中美贸易摩擦透析[J]. 南方经济, 2019(7): 1-15.
[9]  郑伟, 管健. WTO改革的形势、焦点与对策[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2019, 3(1): 75-92.
[10]  陈曦. WTO补贴改革背景下中国贸易救济应对研究[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 24(4): 26-43.
[11]  沈伟, 方荔. 国际经贸协定国企条款的立法趋势与中国的立场演化[J]. 国际经济评论, 2022(5): 93-114.
[12]  李仲平. “一带一路”战略下中国对外投资基础设施的法律风险与对策——基于《补贴与反补贴措施协议》的视角[J]. 中国软科学, 2017(5): 1-8.
[13]  蒋奋, 周威. CPTPP对国有企业的补贴规制与中国因应[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(6): 187-200.
[14]  Li, S. and Tu, X. (2020) Reforming WTO Subsidy Rules: Past Experiences and Prospects. Journal of World Trade, 54, 853-888.
https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020037
[15]  全毅. 通向高水平开放之路——国际经贸规则重构与中国制度型开放[M]. 北京: 中国商务出版社, 2023.
[16]  杨国华. WTO上诉机构危机的国际法分析[J]. 国际法研究, 2024(1): 3-11.
[17]  中华人民共和国商务部. 中国关于世贸组织改革的立场文件[EB/OL]. (2018-12-17)
https://m.mofcom.gov.cn/article/jiguanzx/201812/20181202817611.shtml, 2024-11-25.
[18]  张月姣. 中国在WTO诉美国反补贴措施案中胜诉的意义及启示[J]. 国际法研究, 2022(3): 3-16.
[19]  中国人民银行网. 易纲行长在2018年G30国际银行业研讨会的发言及答问[EB/OL]. (2018-10-14)
http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/3643836/index.html, 2024-11-25.
[20]  鄢姿俏, 李婉丽. 公平竞争审查与政府补贴竞争中性[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(10): 124-138.
[21]  张生, 李妮. 欧盟外国补贴立法: 发展、影响及中国的应对[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(3): 51-57.
[22]  王晓红, 等. 加入CPTPP, 推动高水平开放[M]. 北京: 中国金融出版社, 2023.
[23]  求是网. 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的决定[EB/OL]. (2024-05-15)
http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2024-08/15/c_1130192011.htm, 2024-11-25.
[24]  巴曙松. 竞争中性原则的形成及其在中国的实施[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133