|
Dispute Settlement 2025
论大数据背景下未成年人信息保护的法律完善
|
Abstract:
随着我国互联网技术的不断提高和经济的不断发展,我国早已进入到互联网大数据时代,未成年人也逐步成为主要参与者,然而大数据在带给未成年人便利的同时,也增加了未成年信息侵权案件发生的风险。就我国目前的未成年人信息保护而言,我国法律上主要存在着未成年人年龄划分机制不合理、监护人同意制度不完善、网络运营商规避规定、赔偿标准较低等问题。我国应该借鉴美国《儿童在线隐私保护法》、欧盟《通用数据保护条例》等有参考价值的制度,将我国未成年人划分为14周岁、14~16周岁、16~18周岁三个年龄阶段;立法上完善监护人同意制度在知情同意等规则上的不足;加大网络运营商的义务和责任;引入惩罚性赔偿机制,通过对未成年人信息保护的问题进行分析并提出相应对策,完善我国未成年人信息保护的路径。
With the continuous improvement of China’s Internet technology and the continuous development of the economy, China has already entered the Internet big data era, and minors have gradually become the main participants. However, big data brings convenience to minors, but also increases the risk of minors’ information infringement cases. As far as the information protection of minors in China is concerned, China’s laws are mainly characterized by such problems as unreasonable system of age division of minors, imperfect system of guardian consent, evasion network of regulations by network operators, low compensation standards and other issues. China should learn from the United States “Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act”, the European Union “General Data Protection Regulations” and other valuable reference systems and divide minors in China into three age stages: 14, 14~16 and 16~18; legislate to improve the insufficiency of the guardian’s consent system in terms of the rules of informed consent and other rules; increase the obligations and responsibilities of network operators; and introduce punitive compensation mechanism, through analyzing the problems of the protection of minors’ information and proposing corresponding countermeasures to improve the path for the protection of minors’ information in China.
[1] | 石佳友. 隐私权与个人信息关系的再思考[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2021, 36(5): 81-98. |
[2] | 朱晓峰, 黎泓玥. 私密信息与敏感个人信息区分保护论[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2023(1): 21-38. |
[3] | Macenaite, M. (2017) From Universal Towards Child-Specific Protection of the Right to Privacy Online: Dilemmas in the EU General Data Protection Regulation. New Media & Society, 19, 765-779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686327 |
[4] | 孙跃元. 未成年人个人信息保护中监护人同意规则的检视与完善[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(1): 149-164+208. |
[5] | 邱饰雪. 民事公益诉讼的新发展——兼论未成年人个人信息保护[J]. 南都学坛, 2023, 43(1): 60-67. |
[6] | 张继红, 尹菡. 数字时代未成年人个人信息的法律保护[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2021(2): 97-106. |
[7] | Milkaite, I. and Lievens, E. (2019) Children’s Rights to Privacy and Data Protection around the World: Challenges in the Digital Realm. European Journal of Law and Technology, 10, 1-24. |
[8] | Matecki, L.A. (2010) Update: COPPA Is Ineffective Legislation! Next Steps for Protecting Youth Privacy Rights in the Social Networking Era. Northwestern Journal of Law &Social Policy, 5, 369-402. |
[9] | Bartoli, E. (2009) Children’s Data Protection vs Marketing Companies. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 23, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860902742612 |
[10] | 徐培颖. 未成年人个人信息保护中监护人同意之完善[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2022(5): 180-182. |
[11] | 单勇. 未成年人数据权利保护与被害预防研究——以美国《儿童在线隐私保护法》为例[J]. 河南社会科学, 2019, 27(11): 49-57. |
[12] | 蔡一博, 吴涛. 未成年人个人信息保护的困境与制度应对——以“替代决定”的监护人同意机制完善为视角[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2021, 40(2): 126-133. |