The assessment of social sustainability is fundamental to designing public policies, especially in housing, in order to align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a condition established by Europe for access to public funding, as is the case of the EU’s Next Generation funds. While environmental sustainability has clear criteria, social sustainability lacks standardized metrics. This study reviews the evaluation of social sustainability in urban environments based on academic publications and certifying bodies. From the review, it is clear that the publications and tools provide indicators that assess neighborhood cohesion and urban design, but both approaches neglect social equity, a key element of sustainability despite its importance already highlighted in the Brundtland Report (1987). Based on the information collected, an assessment tool is proposed that considers 45 indicators grouped into three categories: social equity, neighborhood cohesion and urban design. In addition, the indicators are aligned with the SDGs. Alignment with 12 of the 17 SDGs is obtained, with 11 having the highest alignment with the indicators (80%) followed by 10 and 16 (27% each). The proposed framework allows for adequate representativeness in the evaluation of social cohesion, overcoming the underrepresentation of previous proposals. In addition, the work highlights the need to advance social equity to ensure truly sustainable urban environments. Issues such as social inclusion, redistributive policies, accessibility to housing and employability must occupy a central place in the evaluations. The challenge now is to define solid indicators that allow objective evaluations that place the value of equity as a pillar of social sustainability.
References
[1]
AEUB. Agència d’Ecologia Urbana de Barcelona (2020). Certificacióndelurbanismoeco-lógico. https://www.coruna.gal/descarga/1453745960502/Certificacion_del_urbanismo_ecologico_AEUB_2020.pdf
[2]
Åhman, H. (2013). Social Sustainability—Society at the Intersection of Development and Maintenance. LocalEnvironment,18, 1153-1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.788480
[3]
Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33129
[4]
Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. L. (2008). Critical Factors for Improving Social Sustainability of Urban Renewal Projects. SocialIndicatorsResearch,85, 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9089-3
[5]
Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). Social Sustainability, Sustainable Development and Housing Development: The Experience of Hong Kong SAR. In HousingandSocialChange (pp. 221-239). Routledge.
[6]
Choguill, C. L. (2008). Developing Sustainable Neighbourhoods. HabitatInternational,32, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.007
[7]
Daly, H. E. (2007). EcologicalEconomicsandSustainableDevelopment,SelectedEssaysofHermanDaly. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847206947
[8]
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. SustainableDevelopment,19, 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
[9]
Dixon, T. J., & Woodcraft, S. (2013). Creating Strong Communities: Measuring Social Sustainabilityin New Housing Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320895251
[10]
Doğu, F., & Aras, L. (2019). Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case. Sustainability,11, Article No. 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092503
[11]
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing Limited. https://www.sdg.services/uploads/9/9/2/1/9921626/cannibalswithforks.pdf
[12]
Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In TheTripleBottomLine (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
[13]
Godschalk, D. R. (2004). Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities. JournaloftheAmericanPlanningAssociation,70, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976334
[14]
Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable Development: Our Common Future Revisited. GlobalEnvironmentalChange,26, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006
[15]
Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2018). Urban Sustainability Assessment Tools: A Review. JournalofCleanerProduction,210, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009
[16]
Larimian, T., & Sadeghi, A. (2021). Measuring Urban Social Sustainability: Scale Development and Validation. EnvironmentandPlanningB:UrbanAnalyticsandCityScience,48, 621-637. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319882950
[17]
Nurse, K. (2006). 2.CultureastheFourthPillarofSustainableDevelopment.
[18]
Pierson J. (2002). Tackling Social Exclusion. Routledge.
[19]
Ratcliffe, P. (2000). Is the Assertion of Minority Identity Compatible with the Idea of a Socially Inclusive Society? In P. Askonas, & A. Stewart (Eds.), SocialInclusion:PossibilitiesandTensions (pp. 169-185). Macmillan.
[20]
Sachs, I. (1999). Social Sustainability and Whole Development: Exploring the Dimensions of Sustainable Development. In Sustainabilityandthe Social Sciences: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerationsinto Theoretical Reorientation (pp. 25-36). UNESCO.
[21]
Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2019). TheTriadofSocialSustainabilityDefiningandMeasuringSocialSustainabilityofUrbanNeighbourhoods.
[22]
Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2021). Social Sustainability of Compact Neighbourhoods Evidence from London and Berlin. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042340
[23]
Shirazi, M. R., Keivani, R., Brownill, S., & Butina Watson, G. (2022). Promoting Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Bethnal Green, London. InternationalJournalofUrbanandRegionalResearch,46, 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12946
[24]
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What Is Social Sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum,42, 342-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002