全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于综合难度模型的“几何与代数”试题难度分析——以2021~2024年全国高考数学甲卷(理科)、Ⅰ卷、Ⅱ卷为例
Difficulty Analysis of “Geometry and Algebra” Exam Questions Based on a Comprehensive Difficulty Model—Taking the National College Entrance Examination Mathematics (Science) I, II and III from 2021 to 2024 as Examples

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.151119, PP. 869-879

Keywords: 高考数学,综合难度模型,“几何与代数”
College Entrance Exam Mathematics
, Integrated Difficulty Model, “Geometry and Algebra”

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

文章基于武小鹏等人提出的数学高考试题综合难度模型,对2021~2024年全国甲卷(理科)、新高考Ⅰ卷、新高考Ⅱ卷共12套试卷中涉及“几何与代数”的试题进行难度比较分析。研究发现:“几何与代数”试题编制背景单调,整体难度变化不大;强调综合性知识的理解与应用。因此,在此基础上提出:丰富试题情境,拓展学生思维;重视逆向思考,提高解题能力;强调数学运算,加强数学素养,这几点建议。
Based on the mathematical high examination test comprehensive difficulty model proposed by Wu Xiaopeng et al., this paper conducts a comparative analysis of the difficulty of “Geometry and Algebra” questions in 12 sets of national level I (science) examination papers from 2021 to 2024, including the new national college entrance examination I and II. The study found that the background of “Geometry and Algebra” question formulation was monotonous, and the overall difficulty changed little; it emphasized the understanding and application of comprehensive knowledge; accordingly, the following suggestions were put forward: enrich the question context to broaden students’ thinking; attach importance to reverse thinking to improve problem-solving ability; emphasize mathematical operations to enhance mathematical literacy.

References

[1]  鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[2]  武小鹏, 孔企平. 基于AHP理论的数学高考试题综合难度模型构建与应用[J]. 数学教育学报, 2020, 29(2): 29-34.
[3]  中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[4]  教育部考试中心. 中国高考评价体系说明[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2019.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133