全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A2/O与A2/O + MBR工艺在新疆某污水厂中的运行效能对比
Comparison of Operational Efficiency between A2/O and A2/O + MBR Processes in a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Xinjiang

DOI: 10.12677/wpt.2025.131001, PP. 1-8

Keywords: A2/O + MBR工艺,A2/O工艺,城镇污水处理,混合液污泥浓度,有机物去除率
A2/O + MBR Process
, A2/O Process, Urban Sewage Treatment, Mixed Liquid Sludge Concentration, Organic Removal Rate

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A2/O + MBR工艺为A2/O工艺与MBR工艺的串联组合,利用了MBR膜池代替A2/O工艺中的二沉池,使其具有更小的占地面积和更加优质、稳定的出水水质保障。为了探究传统A2/O工艺及A2/O + MBR工艺在城镇污水处理中的应用效能,在同季节、同时段、进水均匀分配的条件下,比较分析了两种工艺在连续31 d中对污染物的降解效能。结果表明:A2/O + MBR工艺在处理城镇生活污水的效果上优于传统A2/O工艺,且抗冲击负荷能力更强,是更具优势的成熟工艺。A2/O工艺、A2/O + MBR工艺的平均处理成本分别为0.4702元/m3、0.6354元/m3,传统A2/O工艺运行成本比A2/O + MBR工艺低0.1652元/m3,相较之下更具经济性。
The A2/O + MBR process is a series combination of A2/O process and MBR process. The MBR membrane tank is used to replace the secondary sedimentation tank in the A2/O process, so that it has a smaller floor area and better quality and stable effluent quality assurance. In order to explore the application efficiency of traditional A2/O process and A2/O + MBR process in urban sewage treatment, the degradation efficiency of pollutants by the two processes in 31 days was compared and analyzed under the condition of uniform distribution of water in the same season and at the same time. The results show that the A2/O + MBR process is superior to the traditional A2/O process in the treatment of urban domestic sewage, and the impact load resistance is stronger, which is a more advantageous mature process. The average treatment costs of theA2/O process and the A2/O + MBR process are 0.4702 yuan/m3 and 0.6354 yuan/m3, respectively. The operating cost of the traditional A2/O process is 0.1652 yuan/m3 lower than that of the A2/O + MBR process, which is more economical.

References

[1]  田海成, 杨红红, 焦文海, 等. AAO + MBR组合工艺各工段设计要点[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023, 39(6): 71-77.
[2]  李社锋, 张家琛, 冯巍, 等.膜生物反应器研究新进展与应用[J]. 环境工程, 2024, 42(1): 37-46.
[3]  王志伟. 膜法污水处理技术的绿色低碳化发展思考[J]. 给水排水, 2022, 58(7): 1-10.
[4]  Meng, F., Zhang, S., Oh, Y., Zhou, Z., Shin, H. and Chae, S. (2017) Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors: An Updated Review. Water Research, 114, 151-180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.006
[5]  刘瑾, 高廷耀. 城市污水生物除磷脱氮的机理及工艺研究[J]. 给水排水, 1995(11): 47.
[6]  范艳明. 污泥停留时间对除磷菌种群结构的影响分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2015.
[7]  赵晓娟, 张智瑞, 刘东洋, 等. A2O工艺活性污泥黏性膨胀原因及控制措施[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(4): 198-204.
[8]  胡小兵, 韦京云, 林睿, 等. 营养失衡下的分层分质EPS对异型膨胀污泥及其沉降性差异影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(12): 5110-5118.
[9]  王少坡, 于静洁, 吕建波, 等. 活性污泥法中污泥龄应用问题探讨[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 45(S2): 118-122.
[10]  许忠凤, 戴海平, 孙磊, 等. 多级A/O-MBR工艺对生活污水脱氮除磷的工艺研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2019, 45(11): 117-121, 126.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133