Objective: To evaluate the application effect of ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in the teaching of anesthesia residents. Methods: Forty anesthesia resident companions who received standardized residency training in our department from July 2018 to July 2020 were randomly divided into an ultrasound group and a control group, with 20 participants in each group. The ultrasound group was taught by ultrasound-guided central venipuncture, while the control group was taught by traditional anatomy. After ten training punctures, all trainees were assessed twice. Results: Both groups could master the technique of central venipuncture. The success rate of first puncture and the overall success rate of puncture in the ultrasound group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The operation time and puncture complications in the ultrasound group were less than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional anatomical localization teaching, the use of ultrasound-guided technology can improve the success rate of puncture, save puncture time, reduce related complications, and have a better training effect.
References
[1]
Shin, K.W., Park, S., Jo, W., Choi, S., Kim, Y.J., Park, H., et al. (2024) Comparison of Catheter Malposition between Left and Right Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Subclavian Venous Catheterizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Critical Care Medicine, 52, 1557-1566. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006368
[2]
Schmidt, G.A. and Kory, P. (2013) Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion: Teaching and Learning. Intensive Care Medicine, 40, 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3093-7
[3]
Tang, J., Wang, L., Ouyang, J., Tang, X., Liu, M., Liu, H., et al. (2023) Modified Combined Short and Long Axis Method versus Oblique Axis Method in Adult Patients Undergoing Right Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Study. PLOS ONE, 18, e0295916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295916
[4]
Hoffman, T., Du Plessis, M., Prekupec, M.P., Gielecki, J., Zurada, A., Tubbs, R.S., et al. (2017) Ultrasound‐guided Central Venous Catheterization: A Review of the Relevant Anatomy, Technique, Complications, and Anatomical Variations. Clinical Anatomy, 30, 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22768
[5]
Adrian, M., Borgquist, O., Kröger, T., Linné, E., Bentzer, P., Spångfors, M., et al. (2022) Mechanical Complications after Central Venous Catheterisation in the Ultrasound-Guided Era: A Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 129, 843-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.036
[6]
Yamak Altinpulluk, E. and Turan, A. (2021) Future in Regional Anesthesia: New Techniques and Technological Advancements. Minerva Anestesiologica, 87, 85-100. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14791-6
[7]
Imai, E., Kataoka, Y., Watanabe, J., Okano, H., Namekawa, M., Owada, G., et al. (2024) Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization around the Neck: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 78, 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.043
[8]
Su, W., Yang, C., Yang, L. and Li, J. (2023) Current Situation Analysis and Improvement Measures of Anesthesia Teaching in Standardized Training of Non-Anesthesia Residents. Asian Journal of Surgery, 46, 977-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.10.064
[9]
Wang, S., Chen, W., Ma, J. and Zhan, J. (2024) Thoughts on Teaching Ward Round in the Standardized Training of Anesthesiology Residents. Asian Journal of Surgery, 47, 2788-2789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.068
[10]
Houben, K.W., van den Hombergh, C.L.M., Stalmeijer, R.E., Scherpbier, A.J. and Marcus, M.A.E. (2011) New Training Strategies for Anaesthesia Residents. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 24, 682-686. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e32834c8842
[11]
Harmon, D.J., Boscardin, C.K., Cohen, N.H. and Braehler, M.R. (2023) The Efficacy of an Anatomy and Ultrasonography Workshop on Improving Residents’ Confidence and Knowledge in Regional Anesthesia. BMC Medical Education, 23, Article No. 665. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04653-y
[12]
Mcgraw, R., Chaplin, T., Mckaigney, C., et al. (2016) Development and Evaluation of a Simulation-Based Curriculum for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18, 405-413.
[13]
Ball, R.D., Scouras, N.E., Orebaugh, S., Wilde, J. and Sakai, T. (2012) Randomized, Prospective, Observational Simulation Study Comparing Residents’ Needle-Guided vs Free-Hand Ultrasound Techniques for Central Venous Catheter Access. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 108, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer329
[14]
De Cassai, A., Geraldini, F., Pasin, L., Boscolo, A., Zarantonello, F., Tocco, M., et al. (2021) Safety in Training for Ultrasound Guided Internal Jugular Vein CVC Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis. BMC Anesthesiology, 21, Article No. 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01460-0
[15]
Rando, K., Castelli, J., Pratt, J.P., et al. (2014) Ultrasoundguided Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Heart, Lung and Vessels, 6, 13-23.
[16]
Yoon, H., Hur, M., Cho, H., Jeong, Y.H., Lee, H., Yang, S., et al. (2021) Effects of Practitioner’s Experience on the Clinical Performance of Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization: A Randomized Trial. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 6726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86322-y
[17]
Koh, J., Xu, Y., Yeo, L., Tee, A., Chuin, S., Law, J., et al. (2014) Achieving Optimal Clinical Outcomes in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterizations of the Internal Jugular Vein after a Simulation-Based Training Program for Novice Learners. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 9, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000010
