全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于工程教育专业认证的课堂教学质量评价体系的探索
Exploration of Classroom Teaching Quality Evaluation System Based on Engineering Education Professional Certification

DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.131050, PP. 371-377

Keywords: 专业认证,课堂教学,质量评价
Professional Certification
, Classroom Teaching, Quality Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

课堂教学是落实人才培养目标的主战场,有效的课堂教学质量评价体系有助于提升教学质量水平。本研究基于工程教育专业认证标准,确定了课堂教学质量评价体系建立原则,构建了三层次的课堂教学质量评价指标体系。在背景评价、输入评价、过程评价、成果评价四个一级指标下,设立了11个二级指标、26个三级指标。为工科专业进行课堂教学质量评价体系提供了有益的参考。
Classroom teaching is the main battlefield to implement the goal of talent training. Effective classroom teaching quality evaluation system is helpful to improve the level of teaching quality. Based on the professional certification standards of engineering education, this study determined the principles of establishing the classroom teaching quality evaluation system, and constructed a three-level classroom teaching quality evaluation index system. Under the four first-level indexes of context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation and product evaluation, 11 second-level indexes and 26 third-level indexes were set up. It provides a reference for the evaluation system of classroom teaching quality for engineering majors.

References

[1]  习近平: 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].
http://china.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202210/25/WS6357e9c3a310817f312f31d5.html, 2024-12-20.
[2]  张海玲, 韩立夫, 王震. 新工科背景下应用型本科院校教学质量评价体系研究[J]. 高教学刊, 2022, 8(16): 58-61.
[3]  李红武, 孟小红. 地方高校课堂教学质量评价体系重构探析[J]. 南阳师范学院学报, 2024, 23(5): 87-93.
[4]  何敬民. 基于雨课堂混合式教学模式的工程数学教学质量评价研究[J]. 高教学刊, 2024, 10(11): 72-75.
[5]  耿精. 地方高校课堂教学质量评价的实践研究——面向工程教育认证[J]. 大学, 2022, 2(14): 30-33.
[6]  童春燕. 浅析课程思政背景下高校教学质量评价存在的问题及其成因[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2022, 38(6): 120-123.
[7]  李爽, 刘紫荆, 郑勤华. 智能时代数据驱动的在线教学质量评价探究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2022, 43(8): 36-42, 76.
[8]  燕姣云, 安俊丽, 孙国红. 课堂教学质量评价指标体系重构[J]. 中国大学教学, 2023(12): 74-78, 91.
[9]  曹淑霞, 董翠玲, 牛军强. 基于层次分析法的课堂教学质量评价体系研究——以概率论与数理统计课程为例[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 43(4): 75-82.
[10]  王威娜. 基于模糊认知图的线上教学质量评价因素分析[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2022, 40(6): 101-106.
[11]  郭惠勇. 基于云模型的教学质量评价方法的有效性研究——以工程力学课程为例[J]. 高等建筑教育, 2021, 30(4): 7-15.
[12]  段亚敏, 焦梦青, 赵楠. BP神经网络在地质类专业教学质量评价中的应用[J]. 河北地质大学学报, 2022, 45(3): 137-140.
[13]  董洁, 彭开香, 李擎, 等. 工程教育专业认证中课程质量定性评价方法研究[J]. 高等理科教育, 2019(6): 56-64.
[14]  Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H. and Lubans, D. (2017) Effects of Professional Development on the Quality of Teaching: Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 99-113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007
[15]  Zhang, M., Wang, J. and Zhou, R. (2019) Entropy Value-Based Pursuit Projection Cluster for the Teaching Quality Evaluation with Interval Number. Entropy, 21, Article 203.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e21020203
[16]  Jiang, L. and Wang, X. (2020) Optimization of Online Teaching Quality Evaluation Model Based on Hierarchical PSO-BP Neural Network. Complexity, 2020, Article 6647683.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6647683
[17]  Sulis, I., Porcu, M. and Capursi, V. (2018) On the Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Longitudinal Analysis Combining Measurement Issues and Implications of the Exercise. Social Indicators Research, 142, 1305-1331.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1946-8
[18]  Ndukwe, I.G., Daniel, B.K. and Butson, R.J. (2018) Data Science Approach for Simulating Educational Data: Towards the Development of Teaching Outcome Model (TOM). Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2, Article 24.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc2030024
[19]  Lv, Q. (2023) Examining the College English Classroom Teaching Quality Using the Fuzzy Evaluation Model. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45, 7753-7767.
https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-231321
[20]  陈浩然. “以学生为中心”的高校课堂教学质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 应用型高等教育研究, 2022, 7(3): 12-19.
[21]  张靓婷, 高伟, 张洪斌, 等. 基于CIPP模型的应用型本科院校课堂教学质量评价研究[J]. 高教学刊, 2022, 8(20): 19-22.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133