This study examines the application and characteristics of qualitative research methods in the field of clinical psychology in Japan. While quantitative and single-case studies have been common in the past, there has been a gradual increase in qualitative research, driven by the need for a more profound comprehension of complex psychosocial issues and practices. By reviewing articles published between 2010 and 2022 in two major Japanese clinical psychology journals, we analyze the diversity in data collection and analytical methods, especially focusing on studies involving participants in need of psychological support. Our findings reveal that qualitative methods, such as semi-structured interviews and clinical practice records, are predominantly used in clinical settings. The grounded theory approach emerges as a popular analytical framework for analysis, offering theoretical insights into practical applications in psychology. This study highlights the adaptability and importance of qualitative research to uncover subtle insights in clinical settings, as well as the gaps in the realities of its use across clinical psychology disciplines such as justice, industry, and psychotherapy. Future research should explore wider applications of qualitative methods to enhance their integration and relevance within clinical psychology.
References
[1]
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
[2]
Chapman, G. B., & Sonnenberg, F. A. (2000). Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage.
[4]
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
[5]
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
[6]
Flick, U. (1995). Qualitative Forschung. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH.
[7]
Fukushima, T. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods for Clinical Practice: From Thesis and Master’s Theses to Submitted Papers in Clinical Psychology. Shinyosha. (In Japanese)
[8]
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
[9]
Hanashima, H. (2011). A Study of Hikikomori (Shut-Ins) Person’s Ibasho (One’s Own Space) and Vocational Establishment: A Process until Joining Society from Ibasho. Journal of Japanese Clinical Psychology/Association of Japanese Clinical Psychology, 29, 610-621.
[10]
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
[11]
Iida, M., Kamimura, K., & Hirata, Y. (2023). Trends and Prospects for Qualitative Research in Clinical Psychology. Cultural Science Reports of Kagoshima University, 90, 13-24.
[12]
Isono, M. (2016). An Introduction of Qualitative Research for Clinicians—Three Attitudes That Are Necessary for Valuable Qualitative Research. Medical Education, 47, 353-361. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.47.6_353
[13]
Isono, M. (2017). An Introduction to Qualitative Research for Clinicians (Second Volume): What Is Critical Is Not the Method, but the Question. Medical Education, 48, 91-99. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.11307/mededjapan.48.2_91
[14]
Iwakabe, S. (2010). First-Time Qualitative Research in Clinical Psychology: Methods and Processes. Iwasaki Gakujutu Shuppansya. (In Japanese)
[15]
Japanese Society of Certified Clinical Psychologists (2024). The 9th Report on the Trends of Clinical Psychologists. (In Japanese) https://www.jsccp.jp/members/information/results/pdf/doukoucyousa_vol9.pdf
[16]
Kinoshita, Y. (2007). Live Lecture M-GTA: Practical Qualitative Research Methods. Koubundou Publishers Inc. (In Japanese)
[17]
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
[18]
McLeod, J. (1999). Qualitative Research in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Sage.
[19]
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
[20]
Morse, J. M. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.
[21]
Naito, T. (2002). Introduction to PAC Analysis Methods: Invitation to New Techniques for Studying the “Individual”. Nakanishiya Publishing. (In Japanese)
[22]
Nakamura, Y. (1992). What Is Clinical Knowledge? Iwanami Shoten. (In Japanese)
[23]
Nochi, M. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. University of Tokyo Press. (In Japanese)
[24]
Noda, M. (2019). Discussions on Qualitative Research in Clinical Psychology: Perspectives on Clinical Possibility in the Epistemology of Qualitative Research. Kyoto University Re-search Studies in Education, 65, 137-149. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/240804
[25]
Otani, N. (2019). Concept of Qualitative Research: From Research Methodology to SCAT Analysis. The University of Nagoya Press. (In Japanese)
[26]
Reisetter, M., Korcuska, J. S., Yexley, M., Bonds, D., Nikels, H., & McHenry, W. (2004). Counselor Educators and Qualitative Research: Affirming a Research Identity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2004.tb01856.x
[27]
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[28]
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage Publications.
[29]
Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Routledge.
[30]
Yamamoto, K. (2014). A Survey of Dissertations in Clinical Psychology in Japan Adopted a Grounded Theory Approach for Analysis. Rikkyo Clinical Psychology Research, 8, 57-65.
[31]
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
