|
|
科教融汇视域下高职学生脑科学素养提升实践——以“基于脑的学习观”为例
|
Abstract:
随着脑科学研究不断推进，许多产业应用都在酝酿着历史性突破。科教融汇的举措将带动高职院校全面加入教育、科技等领域新布局，具备脑科学素养是高职学生迎接科技进步的积极准备。“基于脑的学习观”是教师基于学生学情提出的脑科学素养主题，围绕脑的学习机制、科学学习、学习的常见误区等维度确立知识体系，以“主线课程 + 支线融合”的实践策略，浸润到学生的校园学习中。
As brain science research is advancing, many industrial applications are in the pipeline for historic breakthroughs. Science-education Integration will drive higher vocational colleges to fully join the new layout of education, science and technology. Having brain science literacy is a positive preparation for students to meet the progress of science and technology. “Brain-based View of Learning” is the theme of brain science literacy put forward by teachers based on students’ learning situation. It establishes the knowledge system around the dimensions of brain learning mechanism, scientific learning and misunderstood learning, and infiltrates into students’ learning with the practical strategy of “main line course + branch line integration”.
| [1] | Jensen, E. (2005). 适于脑的教学. 中国轻工业出版社. |
| [2] | 池谷裕二(2019). 考试脑科学. 人民邮电出版社. |
| [3] | 姜宝腾(2022). 教育神经科学导向的教学策略初探. 教育家, (51), 63-65. |
| [4] | 李烨, 叶明(2010). 透视脑科学与教育研究中的“神经神话”. 当代教育科学, (1), 3-5+27. |
| [5] | 唐孝威, 秦金亮(2016). 神经教育学: 心智、脑与教育的集成. 浙江大学出版社. |
| [6] | 小泉英明(2009). 科学与教育入门. 高等教育出版社. |
| [7] | 薛贵(2018). 脑科学与学习变革. 教育家, (4), 60-63. |
| [8] | 薛贵(2020). 脑科学时代的未来教育目标变革. 人民教育, (10), 31-35. |
| [9] | Eliot, L., Ahmed, A., Khan, H., & Patel, J. (2021). Dump the “Dimorphism”: Comprehensive Synthesis of Human Brain Studies Reveals Few Male-Female Differences Beyond Size. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 667-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.026 |
| [10] | Kudithipudi, D., Aguilar-Simon, M., Babb, J., Bazhenov, M., Blackiston, D., Bongard, J., et al. (2022) Biological Underpinnings for Lifelong Learning Machines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4, 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00452-0 |
| [11] | O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Gender Differences in Individual Variation in Academic Grades Fail to Fit Expected Patterns for Stem. Nature Communications, 9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0 |
