|
|
Modern Management 2025
公共数据开放如何影响政府透明度？——基于准自然实验的证据
|
Abstract:
本研究以2015~2022年中国地级市为样本，采用双重差分法(DID)检验公共数据开放对政府透明度的影响。研究结果表明，公共数据开放显著提升了政府透明度，体现在信息公开程度和在线服务能力的双重改善。区域异质性分析显示，东部地区的政策效应最为显著，中部地区次之，而西部地区的效果最弱甚至呈负向。通过剔除四大直辖市样本及采用倾向得分匹配双重差分法(PSM + DID)进行稳健性检验，研究结果依然稳健。本研究为优化公共数据开放政策、实现区域协调发展和推进国家治理现代化提供了重要学术支持和实践参考。
Using a dataset from 2015 to 2022 covering Chinese prefecture-level cities, this study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the impact of public data openness on government transparency. The findings reveal that public data openness significantly enhances government transparency, reflected in improvements in both information disclosure and online service capabilities. Regional heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effects are most pronounced in eastern regions, moderate in central regions, and weakest, or even negative in western regions. Robustness tests, including the exclusion of four major municipalities and the use of propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM + DID), confirm the reliability of the results. This study provides critical academic support and practical guidance for optimizing public data openness policies, promoting regional coordinated development, and advancing national governance modernization.
| [1] | 于立, 王建林. 生产要素理论新论——兼论数据要素的共性和特性[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2020, 41(4): 62-73. |
| [2] | Fazekas, M. and Kocsis, G. (2017) Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data. British Journal of Political Science, 50, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123417000461 |
| [3] | Charles, V., Rana, N.P. and Carter, L. (2022) Artificial Intelligence for Data-Driven Decision-Making and Governance in Public Affairs. Government Information Quarterly, 39, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101742 |
| [4] | Park, S. and Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2022) Open Data Innovation: Visualizations and Process Redesign as a Way to Bridge the Transparency-Accountability Gap. Government Information Quarterly, 39, Article 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101456 |
| [5] | Du, J., Gao, H., Wen, H. and Ye, Y. (2024) Public Data Access and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 130, Article 106591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106591 |
| [6] | 刘谊, 刘星. 我国政府信息透明度的现实思考[J]. 中国软科学, 2004(9): 24-31. |
| [7] | 方锦程, 刘颖, 高昊宇, 等. 公共数据开放能否促进区域协调发展?——来自政府数据平台上线的准自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(9): 124-142. |
| [8] | Akerlof, G. (1995) The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. In: Estrin, S., and Marin, A., Eds., Essential Readings in Economics, Macmillan Education UK, 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_9 |
| [9] | Knach, S. (2001) Reviewed Work: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Robert D. Putnam. Public Choice, 108, 390-395. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30026373 |
| [10] | Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G. and Meijer, A.J. (2012) Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization: Evidence from an Online Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048 |
| [11] | Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. (2010) Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 |
| [12] | 潘俊, 卞子咏, 赵洵, 等. 政府公共数据开放与审计师定价决策——基于构建数据开放平台的准自然实验[J]. 审计研究, 2023(6): 136-148. |
| [13] | 易玄，侯家宁. 政府信息公开、财政补贴配置及应用绩效[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2018, 39(3): 112-119. |
| [14] | 郑烨, 王春萍, 段永彪. “放管服”改革、政府透明度与区域营商环境——基于国内城市面板数据的实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(9): 9-15. |
