|
|
社会善念对第三方惩罚的影响
|
Abstract:
亲社会行为的核心要素之一是社会善念，这涉及到个体在特定情境中自然地关心他人的幸福。在做出决策时，个体会主动考虑他人的需求和期望。这种行为超越了自我中心的局限，展现了社会中相互尊重和理解的深层价值。第三方惩罚是指旁观者愿意承担个人损失，以惩罚那些违反规则、提出不公平分配的个体，第三方惩罚行为对维护社会公平规范具有重要意义。深度拓展第三方惩罚的成因及其对社会的进步的正面影响，对于深化我们对人类行为和社会互动的理解以及促进社会和谐至关重要。本文过去的研究主要关注情绪和分配者特质对第三方惩罚的影响，而对于先前感知到的社会善念如何影响后续的惩罚行为，这一领域仍需进一步探索。
One of the core elements of prosocial behavior is social mindfulness, which involves an individual’s natural concern for the well-being of others in a given situation. When making decisions, individuals take the initiative to consider the needs and expectations of others. This behavior transcends the limitations of self-centeredness and demonstrates the deep values of mutual respect and understanding in society. Third-party punishment refers to the willingness of bystanders to bear personal losses in order to punish those individuals who violate the rules and propose unfair distribution, and third-party punishment is of great significance to maintaining social fairness norms. Deepening the causes of third-party punishment and its positive impact on social progress is essential to deepen our understanding of human behavior and social interactions, and to promote social harmony. Previous studies in this paper have focused on the effects of emotions and dispenser traits on third-party punishment, but further exploration is needed in this field as to how previously perceived social mindfulness affects subsequent punishment behaviors.
| [1] | 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 等(2018a). “乐”于合作: 感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114. |
| [2] | 窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 等(2018b). 信任还是设防? 互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应. 心理科学, 41(2), 390-396. |
| [3] | 冯佳兴(2020). 分配者特质信息和社会距离对第三方利他行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学. |
| [4] | 高晴晴(2021). 分配者特质信息对初中生第三方惩罚的影响. 硕士学位论文, 锦州: 渤海大学. |
| [5] | 刘长江, 李岩梅, 李纾(2007). 实验社会心理学中的社会困境. 心理科学进展, 15(2), 379-384. |
| [6] | 田一, 王莉, 许燕(2020). 社会善念的研究现状及展望. 心理学进展, 10(8), 1069-1078. |
| [7] | 严益霞(2020). 初中生社会善念行为的发展及其对公平行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学. |
| [8] | 郑显亮, 谢方威, 丁亮, 等(2021). 社会阶层与大学生网络利他行为: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 182-189. |
| [9] | Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011). Reward, Punishment, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594-615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023489 |
| [10] | Chen, S., & Yang, S. (2020). Motives of Altruistic Punishment. Advances in Psychological Science, 28, 1901-1910. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.01901 |
| [11] | Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2013). When Do People Cooperate? The Neuroeconomics of Prosocial Decision Making. Brain and Cognition, 81, 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.009 |
| [12] | Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature, 415, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a |
| [13] | Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation, and the Enforcement of Social Norms. Human Nature, 13, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7 |
| [14] | Gintis, H. (2000). Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111 |
| [15] | Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M. (2008). When Child Development Meets Economic Game Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigating Social Development. Human Development, 51, 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1159/000151494 |
| [16] | Lee, J. (2019). A Study on Resolving Prisoner’s Dilemma Using Incentives and Penalties. Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 42, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2019.42.4.039 |
| [17] | Leliveld, M. C., van Dijk, E., & van Beest, I. (2012). Punishing and Compensating Others at Your Own Expense: The Role of Empathic Concern on Reactions to Distributive Injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.872 |
| [18] | Leyens, J., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A. et al. (2000). The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_06 |
| [19] | Liu, Y., Li, L., Zheng, L., & Guo, X. (2017). Punish the Perpetrator or Compensate the Victim? Gain vs. Loss Context Modulate Third-Party Altruistic Behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02066 |
| [20] | Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Molina, L. E., Branscombe, N. R., & Sullivan, D. (2013). Displacing Blame over the Ingroup’s Harming of a Disadvantaged Group Can Fuel Moral Outrage at a Third-Party Scapegoat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 898-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.005 |
| [21] | Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059 |
| [22] | Van Doesum, N. J., de Vries, R. E., Blokland, A. A. J., Hill, J. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Stivers, A. W. et al. (2019). Social Mindfulness: Prosocial the Active Way. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579352 |
| [23] | Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social Mindfulness: Skill and Will to Navigate the Social World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032540 |
