Physical and Chemical Properties and Plant Growth in an Engineered Soil Manufactured from Bauxite Residue, Green Waste Compost and Increasing Amounts of Sand
A new manufactured soil product (Turba) was produced using acidified bauxite residue into which 10% green waste compost had been incorporated. A laboratory/greenhouse experiment was carried out to determine if sand could be used as an ingredient or an amendment for Turba. Sand was added at rates of 0%, 5%, 10%, 25, 50% and 75% (w/w) in two different ways 1) by incorporating it into the Turba during its manufacture (IN) or 2) by mixing it with Turba aggregates after their manufacture (OUT). Incorporation of sand into Turba aggregates (IN) decreased the percentage of sample present as large aggregates (2 - 4 mm dia.) after crushing and sieving (<4 mm) and also reduced the stability of 2 - 4 mm dia. formed aggregates (to dry/wet sieving) and are therefore not recommended. In a 16-week greenhouse study, ryegrass shoot yields were greater in Turba than in sand [and decreased with increasing sand additions (OUT)] while root dry matter showed the opposite trend. The greater grass growth in Turba than sand was attributed to incipit water stress in plants grown in sand and this may have promoted greater allocation of assimilates to roots resulting in a greater root-to-top mass ratio. The much lower macroporosity in Turba coupled with the solid cemented nature of Turba aggregates resulted in production of thinner roots and therefore greater root length than in sand. Turba (manufactured from bauxite residue and compost added at 10% w/w) is a suitable medium for plant growth and there is no advantage in incorporating sand into, or with, the Turba aggregates.
References
[1]
Klauber, C., Gräfe, M. and Power, G. (2011) Bauxite Residue Issues: II. Options for Residue Utilization. Hydrometallurgy, 108, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.007
[2]
Haynes, R.J. and Zhou, Y.-F. (2024) Production of Manufactured Soil (Turba) from Bauxite Residue—An Overview of Its Development. Proceedings of the 12th International AQW Conference, Dubai. https://aqw.com.au/papers/item/production-of-manufactured-soil-turba-from-bauxite-residue-an-overview-of-its-development
[3]
Weng, X., Haynes, R.J. and Zhou, Y.-F. (2024) Physical Properties of Manufactured Soil (Turba) Produced from Bauxite Residue. Proceedings of the 12th International AQW Conference, Dubai. https://aqw.com.au/papers/item/physical-properties-of-manufactured-soil-turba-produced-from-bauxite-residue
[4]
Haynes, R.J., Zhou, Y.-. and Weng, X. (2021) Formulation and Use of Manufactured Soils: A Major Use for Organic and Inorganic Wastes. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52, 4113-4133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1989909
[5]
Kasa, E., Szabo, Y., Papp. J., Szabados, M., Kutus, B. and Sipos, P. (2024) Synthesis, Characterization and Dissolution of Bauxite Residue (BxR) Components Relevant to Acid Neutralization—Overview on a Bottiom up Study Conducted at University of Szeged. Proceedings of the 12th International AQW Conference, Dubai. https://aqw.com.au/papers/item/synthesis-characterization-and-dissolution-of-bauxite-residue-bxr-components-relevant-to-acid-neutralization-overview-on-a-bottom-up-study-conducted-at-university-of-szeged
[6]
Rayment, G.E. and Higginson, F.R. (1992) Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Inkata Press.
[7]
Colwell, J. (1963) The Estimation of the Phosphorus Fertilizer Requirements of Wheat in Southern New South Wales by Soil Analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 3, Article 190. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea9630190
[8]
Thin Section Australia Pty (2024) https://thinsection.com.au/services/
[9]
Haynes, R.J. and Goh, K.M. (1978) Physical Properties of a Range of Amended Peat-Based Media. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 21, 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1978.10427433
[10]
Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H. (2018) Particle Density. In: SSSA Book Series, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, 377-382. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c14
[11]
Klute, A. (2015) Water Capacity. In: Agronomy Monographs, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c18
[12]
Vomocil, J.A. (2015) Porosity. In: Agronomy Monographs, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c21
[13]
Newman, E.I. (1966) A Method of Estimating the Total Length of Root in a Sample. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 3, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401670
[14]
Li, Y., Haynes, R.J., Chandrawana, I. and Zhou, Y. (2018) Properties of Seawater Neutralized Bauxite Residues and Changes in Chemical, Physical and Microbial Properties Induced by Additions of Gypsum and Organic Matter. Journal of Environmental Management, 223, 489-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.070
[15]
Sargent, P. (2015) The Development of Alkali-Activated Mixtures for Soil Stabilisation. In: Handbook of Alkali-Activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes, Elsevier, 555-604. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422884.4.555
[16]
Zeng, H., Lyu, F., Sun, W., Zhang, H., Wang, L. and Wang, Y. (2020) Progress on the Industrial Applications of Red Mud with a Focus on China. Minerals, 10, Article 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090773
[17]
Hazelton, P. and Murphy, B. (2016) Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? CSIRO Publishing.
Di Carlo, E., Chen, C.R., Haynes, R.J., Phillips, I.R. and Courtney, R. (2019) Soil Quality and Vegetation Performance Indicators for Sustainable Rehabilitation of Bauxite Residue Disposal Areas: A Review. Soil Research, 57, 419-446. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr18348
[22]
Gupta, S.K. and Sharma, S.K. (1990) Response of Crops to High Exchangeable Sodium Percentage. Irrigation Science, 11, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00189455
[23]
Kou, X., Han, W. and Kang, J. (2022) Responses of Root System Architecture to Water Stress at Multiple Levels: A Meta-Analysis of Trials under Controlled Conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 1085409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1085409
[24]
Hernandez-Ramirez, G., Lawrence-Smith, E.J., Sinton, S.M., Tabley, F., Schwen, A., Beare, M.H., et al. (2014) Root Responses to Alterations in Macroporosity and Penetrability in a Silt Loam Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78, 1392-1403. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0005
[25]
Mašková, L., Simmons, R.W., De Baets, S., Montero, E.M., Delmer, A. and Sakrabani, R. (2019) Assessment of Silt from Sand and Gravel Processing as a Suitable Sub-Soil Material in Land Restoration: A Glasshouse Study. Chemosphere, 219, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.155