Rail defects can pose significant safety risks in railway operations, raising the need for effective detection methods. Acoustic Emission (AE) technology has shown promise for identifying and monitoring these defects, and this study evaluates an advanced on-vehicle AE detection approach using bone-conduct sensors—a solution to improve upon previous AE methods of using on-rail sensor installations, which required extensive, costly on-rail sensor networks with limited effectiveness. In response to these challenges, the study specifically explored bone-conduct sensors mounted directly on the vehicle rather than rails by evaluating AE signals generated by the interaction between rails and the train’s wheels while in motion. In this research, a prototype detection system was developed and tested through initial trials at the Nevada Railroad Museum using a track with pre-damaged welding defects. Further testing was conducted at the Transportation Technology Center Inc. (rebranded as MxV Rail) in Colorado, where the system’s performance was evaluated across various defect types and train speeds. The results indicated that bone-conduct sensors were insufficient for detecting AE signals when mounted on moving vehicles. These findings highlight the limitations of contact-based methods in real-world applications and indicate the need for exploring improved, non-contact approaches.
References
[1]
Li, Q. and Ren, S. (2012) A Real-Time Visual Inspection System for Discrete Surface Defects of Rail Heads. IEEETransactionsonInstrumentationandMeasurement, 61, 2189-2199. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2012.2184959
[2]
Deutschl, E., Gasser, C., Niel, A. and Werschonig, J. (2004) Defect Detection on Rail Surfaces by a Vision Based System. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004, Parma, 14-17 June 2004, 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2004.1336435
[3]
Bojarczak, P. (2013) Visual Algorithms for Automatic Detection of Squat Flaws in Railway Rails. Insight—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 55, 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2012.55.7.353
[4]
He, Z., Wang, Y., Yin, F. and Liu, J. (2016) Surface Defect Detection for High-Speed Rails Using an Inverse P-M Diffusion Model. SensorReview, 36, 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/sr-03-2015-0039
[5]
Xiong, Z., Li, Q., Mao, Q. and Zou, Q. (2017) A 3D Laser Profiling System for Rail Surface Defect Detection. Sensors, 17, Article 1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081791
[6]
Office of Railroad Policy and Development (2011) Rolling Contact Fatigue: A Comprehensive Review.
[7]
Lanza di Scalea, F., Rizzo, P., Coccia, S., Bartoli, I., Fateh, M., Viola, E., et al. (2005) Non-contact Ultrasonic Inspection of Rails and Signal Processing for Automatic Defect Detection and Classification. Insight—Non-DestructiveTestingandConditionMonitoring, 47, 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.47.6.346.66449
[8]
Rizzo, P. and Coccia, S. (2009) Noncontact Rail Monitoring by Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring 2397.
[9]
Mariani, S., Nguyen, T., Zhu, X. and Lanza di Scalea, F. (2017) Field Test Performance of Noncontact Ultrasonic Rail Inspection System. JournalofTransportationEngineering, PartA: Systems, 143. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000026
[10]
Kim, N., Sohn, H. and Han, S. (2012) Rail Inspection Using Noncontact Laser Ultrasonics. JournaloftheKoreanSocietyforNondestructiveTesting, 32, 696-702. https://doi.org/10.7779/jksnt.2012.32.6.696
[11]
Lanza di Scalea, F., Zhu, X., Capriotti, M., Liang, A.Y., Mariani, S. and Sternini, S. (2017) Passive Extraction of Dynamic Transfer Function from Arbitrary Ambient Excitations: Application to High-Speed Rail Inspection from Wheel-Generated Waves. JournalofNondestructiveEvaluation, DiagnosticsandPrognosticsofEngineeringSystems, 1, Article ID: 011005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037517
[12]
Coccia, S., Bartoli, I., Marzani, A., Lanza di Scalea, F., Salamone, S. and Fateh, M. (2011) Numerical and Experimental Study of Guided Waves for Detection of Defects in the Rail Head. NDT&EInternational, 44, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.09.011
[13]
Coccia, S., Phillips, R., Nucera, C., Bartoli, I., Salamone, S., Lanza di Scalea, F., et al. (2011) UCSD/FRA Non-Contact Ultrasonic Guided-Wave System for Rail Inspection: An Update. SPIE Proceedings, 7981, Article ID: 798113. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.880238
[14]
Bruzelius, K. and Mba, D. (2004) An Initial Investigation on the Potential Applicability of Acoustic Emission to Rail Track Fault Detection. NDT&EInternational, 37, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.02.001
[15]
Nivesrangsan, P., Steel, J.A. and Reuben, R.L. (2007) Source Location of Acoustic Emission in Diesel Engines. MechanicalSystemsandSignalProcessing, 21, 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.010
[16]
Huang, M., Jiang, L., Liaw, P. and Brooks, C. (1998) Using Acoustic Emission in Fatigue and Fracture Materials Research. JOM, 50, 1-12.
[17]
Zhang, X., Feng, N., Wang, Y. and Shen, Y. (2015) Acoustic Emission Detection of Rail Defect Based on Wavelet Transform and Shannon Entropy. JournalofSoundandVibration, 339, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.11.021
[18]
Zumpano, G. and Meo, M. (2006) A New Damage Detection Technique Based on Wave Propagation for Rails. InternationalJournalofSolidsandStructures, 43, 1023-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.006
[19]
de Oliveira, R. and Marques, A.T. (2008) Health Monitoring of FRP Using Acoustic Emission and Artificial Neural Networks. Computers&Structures, 86, 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.015
[20]
Li, D., Wang, Y., Yan, W. and Ren, W. (2020) Acoustic Emission Wave Classification for Rail Crack Monitoring Based on Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transform and Multi-Branch Convolutional Neural Network. StructuralHealthMonitoring, 20, 1563-1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720922797
[21]
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. and Haffner, P. (1998) Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. ProceedingsoftheIEEE, 86, 2278-2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791
[22]
ASTM E976-15 (1993) Standard Guide for Determining the Reproducibility of Acoustic Emission Sensor Response. ASTM Book of Standards.