|
书写共同体:让–吕克·南希与莫里斯·布朗肖对现代社会的哲学思考与实践路径
|
Abstract:
本文以让–吕克·南希所著的《无用的共同体》(The Inoperative Community)以及莫里斯·布朗肖的《不可言说的共同体》(The Unavowable Community)为分析内容,深入探讨在哲学与社会理论领域中“书写共同体”理论的价值与意义。南希通过提出“无用的共通体”这一概念,重新定义共同体的可能性,批评了传统将共同体工具化的观念,并强调其本质在于“在场的显现”与个体间有限性的交互。布朗肖在此基础上对该理论进行了延伸与发展,他以对友谊、爱以及死亡主题的剖析,阐述了共同体永远未完成且无限扩展的特质。本文旨在通过解读这两部经典著作,探究书写作为共同体走出当代共同体困境的可能性路径,并分析其在当代社会中的伦理意义及政治应用潜能。
This article analyzes Jean-Luc Nancy’s “The Inoperative Community” and Maurice Blanchot’s “The Unavowable Community,” delving into the value and significance of the “writing community” theory within the realms of philosophy and social theory. Nancy redefines the possibilities of community through his concept of the “inoperative community,” criticizing the traditional instrumentalization of community and emphasizing its essence in the “manifestation of presence” and the interaction of individual finitude. Building on this foundation, Blanchot extends and develops the theory by exploring themes of friendship, love, and death, elucidating the characteristics of community as eternally unfinished and infinitely expansive. This article aims to investigate the potential pathways for writing as a means for the community to navigate the contemporary challenges of community, while also analyzing its ethical implications and political applications in contemporary society through the interpretation of these two classic works.
[1] | 麦文隽. 当代西方左翼思潮的“共同体”话语探析[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2022(1): 194-201. |
[2] | 谢超逸. 书文的共同体主义——论布朗肖和南希对共同体的文学化想象[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 32(2): 97-104. |
[3] | 苏林. 从“激情”到交流: 论巴塔耶的文学观[J]. 文艺研究, 2024(6): 42-55. |
[4] | Nancy, J.L. (1991) The Inoperative Community. University of Minnesota Press. |
[5] | 池忠军. 马克思的共同体理论及其当代性[J]. 学海, 2009(5): 41-47. |
[6] | Blanchot, M. (1988) The Unavowable Community. Station Hill. |
[7] | 吴博. 主体的失去与不可言明的共同体——论布朗肖的语言观与主体思想[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2020, 43(5): 152-158. |