|
营商环境与新质生产力耦合协调的时空演进及差异分析
|
Abstract:
选取中国30个省(市、自治区)为研究对象,以2011~2022年数据为观察样本,使用熵值法与耦合协调度模型,测算研究期营商环境与新质生产力的耦合协调发展水平,在此基础上结合Kernel密度估计和Dagum基尼系数,对比分析三大经济区域营商环境与新质生产力之间的耦合协调度的时空演进及差异分析。结果表明,中国各省市营商环境与新质生产力的耦合协调水平呈逐年上升趋势,各区域耦合协调发展水平从高到低依次为东部、中部和西部。通过高斯核函数估计得出在不同时期的地区的分别出现了协调发展水平两极分化现象,并且各省市在营商环境与新质生产力耦合协调总体水平上的区域差异不断扩大。区域间差异是造成三大经济区域耦合协调发展不平衡的主要因素,但其贡献率呈现下降趋势,同时,东部地区与西部省份之间的差距也在逐步缩小。在综合以往研究的基础上,进一步补充和丰富了营商环境与新质生产力之间的理论机制。通过耦合协调度及其空间分布特征和区域差异的综合分析,探讨了营商环境与新质生产力的关系,拓展了该领域的相关研究。分析营商环境对新质生产力发展的具体影响,并结合东部、中部和西部地区的异质性,为政策的精准投入提供了参考依据。
Taking the data from 2011 to 2022 as the observation sample, the entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model were used to measure the coupling and coordinated development level of the business environment and the new quality productivity during the study period. The results show that the coupling and coordination level of business environment and new quality productivity in various provinces and cities in China is increasing year by year, and the coupling and coordinated development level of each region is in the east, central and western regions from high to low. Through the Gaussian kernel function estimation, it is concluded that the polarization of the level of coordinated development has occurred in different regions in different periods, and the regional differences between provinces and cities in the overall level of coupling and coordination of business environment and new quality productivity have been expanding. Regional differences are the main factors causing the imbalance in the coupling and coordinated development of the three major economic regions, but their contribution rate shows a downward trend, and the gap between the eastern region and the western provinces is gradually narrowing. On the basis of the synthesis of previous researches, the theoretical mechanism between the business environment and the new quality productivity is further supplemented and enriched. Through the comprehensive analysis of coupling coordination degree and its spatial distribution characteristics and regional differences, the relationship between business environment and new quality productivity is discussed, and the relevant research in this field is expanded. This paper analyzes the specific impact of the business environment on the development of new productive forces, and combines the heterogeneity of the eastern, central and western regions to provide a reference for precise policy investment.
[1] | 刘娟, 唐加福. 基于文献计量和可视化图谱的营商环境研究述评与展望[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5): 318-331. |
[2] | 于文超, 梁平汉. 不确定性、营商环境与民营企业经营活力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(11): 136-154. |
[3] | 王磊, 景诗龙, 邓芳芳. 营商环境优化对企业创新效率的影响研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(6): 1601-1615. |
[4] | 陈颖, 陈思宇, 王临风. 城市营商环境对企业创新影响研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(12): 20-28. |
[5] | 夏文红. 营商环境: 理论、经验与前瞻[J]. 广西质量监督导报, 2020(9): 239-240. |
[6] | 韩江波, 沙德春, 李超. 新质生产力的演化: 维度、结构及路径[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2024(1): 8-16. |
[7] | 杜传忠, 李钰葳. 强化科技创新能力加快形成新质生产力的机理研究[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 27(1): 100-109. |
[8] | 蒋永穆, 乔张媛. 新质生产力: 逻辑、内涵及路径[J]. 社会科学研究, 2024(1): 10-18. |
[9] | 赵振华. 加快形成新质生产力[J]. 前线, 2024(1): 20-23. |
[10] | 杨仁发, 魏琴琴. 营商环境对城市创新能力的影响研究——基于中介效应的实证检验[J]. 调研世界, 2021(10): 35-43. |
[11] | 任宇新, 吴艳, 伍喆. 金融集聚、产学研合作与新质生产力[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2024, 45(3): 27-34. |
[12] | You, H. (2015) Quantifying the Coordinated Degree of Urbanization in Shanghai, China. Quality & Quantity, 50, 1273-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0204-2 |
[13] | Liu, N., Liu, C., Xia, Y. and Da, B. (2018) Examining the Coordination between Urbanization and Eco-Environment Using Coupling and Spatial Analyses: A Case Study in China. Ecological Indicators, 93, 1163-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.013 |
[14] | 沈小波, 陈语, 林伯强. 技术进步和产业结构扭曲对中国能源强度的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(2): 157-173. |