Approaching from Poverty of Democracy to Prosperity: A Comparative Analysis of Democratic Transitions in South Asia (Bangladesh) and Latin America to Contemporary Times
Liberty and social equity thrive under systems that empower governments to implement reforms and encourage public participation in nation-building, which democracy facilitates. South Asia and Latin American countries were colonized by European powers, which influenced institutions and community practices. In the 20th century, South Asia and Latin America experienced a period of instability in their quest for liberation, equity, and economic development. While democracy promoted protection and cooperation, countries in transition faced challenges due to internal and external factors, political philosophies, business objectives, and modernization. South Asia, particularly Bangladesh, and Latin America supported public elections as part of exercising democracy. However, findings highlighted that transition is complicated because of competing authorities compounded by elitism and industrialization. The systematic review of the literature highlights a comparison between South Asia and Latin America because of the commonality in democratic transition. Findings revealed similarities in the following variables: 1) democracy and fragile states, 2) national transformation, 3) corruption and systemic barriers, 4) human rights violations, and 5) policy recommendations. Policy recommendations indicate strengthened partnerships with Asia Pacific countries to promote transparency, social protection, and economic welfare.
References
[1]
Beachler, D. (2007). The Politics of Genocide Scholarship: The Case of Bangladesh. Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 467-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701657286
[2]
Biberman, Y., & Castellano, R. (2017). Genocidal Violence, Nation-Building, and the Bloody Birth of Bangladesh. Asian Security, 14, 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1335712
[3]
Buben, R., & Kouba, K. (2024). Democracy and Institutional Change in Times of Crises in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 16, 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x241226986
[4]
Camp, R. A. (2008). Democracy’s Path in Mexico? Latin American Perspectives, 35, 189-195. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27648149
[5]
Fatima, M. K., & Yea, S. (2023). Bangladesh’s Body Parts Trade: A Critical Analysis of Gaps in Justice. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 24, 198-229. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24020001
[6]
Frantz, E., & Geddes, B. (2016). The Legacy of Dictatorship for Democratic Parties in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8, 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1600800101
[7]
Freidenberg, F. (2024). Democracy in Latin America: Between Backsliding and Resilience. Athena: Critical Inquiries in Law, Philosophy, and Globalization, 4, 68-109. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2724-6299/19152
[8]
Goldstein, D. M., & Drybread, K. (2018). The Social Life of Corruption in Latin America. Culture, Theory and Critique, 59, 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2018.1531816
[9]
Harvey, D. (2019). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Haug, S., Braveboy-Wagner, J., & Maihold, G. (2021). The ‘Global South’ in the Study of World Politics: Examining a Meta Category. Third World Quarterly, 42, 1923-1944. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1948831
[11]
Heller, P. (2022). Democracy in the Global South. Annual Review of Sociology, 48, 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-123449
[12]
Islam, M. J., Suzuki, M., & Mazumder, N. (2024). Promoting Access to Justice in Bangladesh: Towards a Hybrid Justice Model. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77, Article ID: 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100655
[13]
Islam, M. S., & Rahman, M. M. (2024). The Curious Case of Democratic Backsliding in Bangladesh: An Analysis of People’s Financial Satisfaction. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2360463
[14]
Kabir, A. H. (2013). Neoliberalism, Policy Reforms and Higher Education in Bangladesh. Policy Futures in Education, 11, 154-166. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.2.154
[15]
Khatir, H. (2020). Machiavelli’s Political Philosophy and Its Reception. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 25, 1-5.
[16]
Kumar, R. (2024). Economic Growth, Structural Changes and Employment Linkages in India. Review of Economics and Political Science, 9, 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-07-2022-0051
[17]
Langston, J. K. (2023). Democracy and Bad Government in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 59, 733-743. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2023.33
[18]
Lee, H., & Moumbark, T. (2022). Climate Change, Corruption, and Business Bribes in South Asia. Finance Research Letters, 47, Article ID: 102685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102685
[19]
Lewkowicz, J., Woźniak, M., & Wrzesiński, M. (2022). COVID-19 and Erosion of Democracy. Economic Modelling, 106, Article ID: 105682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105682
[20]
Mendez, J., & Mariezcurrena, J. (2000). Human Rights in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Regional Perspective a Paper Submitted to the Human Development Report 2000. Human Rights and Human Development.
[21]
Montambeault, F. (2024). Rethinking the Study of Democracy in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes, 49, 472-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2024.2393000
[22]
Mostofa, S. M., & Subedi, D. B. (2020). Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism in Bangladesh. Politics and Religion, 14, 431-459. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048320000401
[23]
Müller, M. (2018). Governing Crime and Violence in Latin America. Global Crime, 19, 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2018.1543916
[24]
Murshid, N. (2023). Neoliberalism and Identity-Based Hierarchy. In N. Murshid (Ed.), India’s Bangladesh Problem: The Marginalization of Bengali Muslims in Neoliberal Times (pp. 25-67). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/indias-bangladesh-problem/neoliberalism-and-identitybased-hierarchy/EF226A275538BA678BCA7ED1C4644ADE https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009259392.002
[25]
OECD Development Center (2023). Latin American Economic Outlook 2023.
[26]
Panday, P. K. (2011). Local Government System in Bangladesh: How Far Is It Decentralised? Lex localis—Journal of Local Self-Government, 9, 205-230. https://doi.org/10.4335/9.3.205-230(2011)
[27]
Pearce, J. (2020). Political Regime and the Reproduction of Violence and Criminality in Latin America: An Interdisciplinary Conversation. Latin American Research Review, 55, 859-868. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.1288
[28]
Rahman, S., & Tasnim, F. (2023). The Role of NGOs in Ensuring Local Governance in Bangladesh: From the Perception of Other Actors of Governance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 7, 1007-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-023-00283-w
[29]
Renshaw, C., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2021). Building Human Rights in the Region through the Role of Horizontal Transnational Networks: The Role of the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 27, 422-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2021.2011829
[30]
Shrimankar, D. (2023). Comparative Assessments of Indian Democracy. Studies in Indian Politics, 11, 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230231166182
[31]
Sobhan, R. (1998). How Bad Governance Impedes Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 143, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/466441620275
[32]
Sullivan, D., & Hickel, J. (2023). Capitalism and Extreme Poverty: A Global Analysis of Real Wages, Human Height, and Mortality Since the Long 16th Century. World Development, 161, Article ID: 106026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106026
[33]
Teichman, J. (2004). Merging the Modern and the Traditional: Market Reform in Chile and Argentina. Comparative Politics, 37, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150122
[34]
Trefzer, Jackson,, McKee,, & Dellinger, (2014). Introduction: The Global South and/in the Global North: Interdisciplinary Investigations. The Global South, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.8.2.1
[35]
Tudor, M., & Slater, D. (2020). Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Democracy: Historical Lessons from South and Southeast Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 19, 706-722. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759272000078x
[36]
Uddin, M. K. (2022). Human Rights Abuses and Criminal Justice in Policing Practices in Bangladesh. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 24, 733-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221120915
[37]
United Nations Human Rights (2024). REPORT Preliminary Analysis of Recent Protests and Unrest in Bangladesh.
[38]
United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (2023). Anti-Corruption in Mexico. UNODC Global Integrity Education (GLOZ99).
[39]
United States Department of State (2023). 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bangladesh.
[40]
Westergaard, K. (1998). Decentralization, NGOs and Democratization in Bangladesh. In L. Rudebeck, O. Törnquist, & V. Rojas (Eds.), Democratization in the Third World (pp. 173-188). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26783-5_7
[41]
Youngs, R. (2022). COVID‐19 and Democratic Resilience. Global Policy, 14, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13137
