全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

盗版“剧本杀”侵权认定之困:实践反思与理论构建
The Dilemma of Determining Copyright Infringement in “Murder Mystery Game”: Practical Reflection and Theoretical Construction

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2025.131006, PP. 32-37

Keywords: 剧本杀,出租权,发行权,非法复制品
Murder Mystery Game
, Rental Rights, Distribution Rights, Illegal Reproductions

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

剧本杀是包含文字、绘画等多种要素的“融合作品”,剧本杀经营者向玩家提供盗版剧本临时使用的行为,损害了剧本杀行业版权保护生态,但由于我国著作权法规定的出租权权利范围过窄,司法实践正面临无法根据法定权利对该行为进行规制的困境。通过梳理学界对于提供盗版剧本临时使用行为如何定性的分歧,应考虑扩大出租权客体范围以破除该行为的规制之难。基于利益平衡的视角考量著作权不断扩张的历史发展,借鉴出租权制度的域外发展经验,回应著作权体系的整体协调要求,建立与国际保护水平相适应的出租权制度。
A murder mystery game is a “fusion work” comprising various elements such as words and drawings. The act of providing players with pirated scripts for temporary use by operators of murder mystery games has damaged the copyright protection ecosystem of the murder mystery game industry. However, the narrow scope of the rental right provided in China’s copyright law has resulted in a dilemma for judicial practice, which is unable to regulate this act under legal rights. Beyond sorting out the differences between the scholars on how to qualify the temporary use of pirated scripts, it is imperative to consider an expansion of the scope of the object of the rental right. This would effectively eliminate the current challenge of regulating this act. In light of balancing interests, it is essential to consider the history and the evolution of the copyright ecosystem and draw upon the experience of the extraterritorial development of the rental rights system. This would also try to respond to the need for the overall coordination of the copyright system and to establish a rental rights system that is in line with the international level of protection.

References

[1]  朱丽娜. 市场规模超百亿, “剧本杀”版权保护法律边界在哪儿[N]. 中国新闻出版广电报, 2021-10-14(005).
[2]  王迁. 商家在经营“剧本杀”中使用盗版的定性问题[J]. 中国版权, 2021(5): 26-27.
[3]  张伟君. 规制提供“剧本杀”盗版剧本行为的路径选择——在2021年度AIPPI中国分会版权热点论坛上的发言[Z/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/a1V6IQaY8dkrwgYU1TE40Q, 2021-12-25.
[4]  张伟君, 张林. 权利人怎样追究“剧本杀”经营者使用盗版剧本的侵权责任[N]. 中国新闻出版广电报, 2021-12-02(007).
[5]  李扬. 剧本杀经营者涉他人著作权的行为定性[J]. 知识产权, 2022, 32(5): 21.
[6]  孙山. 权利法定原则在知识产权领域中的应用[J]. 知识产权, 2021(7): 77-82.
[7]  张鹏. “剧本杀”经营者向玩家提供盗版剧本侵犯我国著作权法规定的发行权[Z/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Mzuui4Cz5gn8AGVf3FyITg, 2021-12-03.
[8]  张伟君, 张林. “剧本杀”经营者向玩家提供盗版剧本的行为定性[Z/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ES0arUtzEfaTdtTP6kYPdA, 2021-12-02.
[9]  [德]雷炳德. 著作权法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004.
[10]  联合国贸易发展会议. TRIPS协定与发展: 资料读本[M]. 北京: 中国商务出版社, 2013: 115-148.
[11]  [德]约格·莱因伯特, [德]西尔克·冯·莱温斯基. WIPO因特网条约评注[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008.
[12]  张伟君. 论我国《著作权法》中出租权规则的协调和完善[J]. 知识产权, 2022(5): 61-73.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133