全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于个体固定效应模型对于影子银行在数字普惠金融促进科创企业创新过程中调节机制的分析
An Analysis of the Regulation Mechanism of Shadow Banking in the Process of Digital Inclusive Finance for Innovation in Promoting STAR Market Companies Based on the Individual Fixed-Effect Model

DOI: 10.12677/pm.2025.151006, PP. 47-62

Keywords: 数字普惠金融,科创板企业,影子银行,人工智能,金融监管
Digital Inclusive Finance
, STAR Market Companies, Shadow Banking, Artificial Intelligence, Financial Regulation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文利用滞后一期的数字普惠金融指数与2019~2021年中国科创板上市企业的专利数据进行匹配,使用固定效应模型,考察了数字普惠金融对科创板企业技术创新的影响作用,并深入探究了其中地区影子银行发展程度所起到的调节效应。研究发现:数字普惠金融对于科创板企业技术创新具有显著的促进作用;地区影子银行发展程度对于二者关系具有正向调节效应,影子银行发展缓解科创板企业融资约束的正向作用要高于其可能存在的错误资金导向作用;在影子银行发展的正向调节作用下,数字普惠金融的覆盖广度在促进科创板企业的技术创新方面具有更好的效果;进一步异质性分析发现,在战略层面上对人工智能关注程度较低的科创板企业所受到的数字普惠金融促进效应要更为显著,即非热门领域科创板企业比备受关注的科创板企业具有更少的融资渠道,因此从数字普惠金融中受益更多。结果表明:政府应引导数字普惠金融与科技创新型企业深度融合、鼓励金融机构提升非热门领域的融资服务水平,并优化对影子银行的监管政策,提升资本市场资源配置效率,以促进科技创新和经济高质量发展。
Using the lagged one-period digital inclusive finance index and patent data of Chinese STAR Market listed companies from 2019 to 2021, this study employs a fixed-effect model to examine the impact of digital inclusive finance on technological innovation in STAR Market companies. Additionally, it delves into the moderating effect of regional shadow banking development. The findings reveal that digital inclusive finance significantly promotes technological innovation in STAR Market companies. Furthermore, the development of regional shadow banking positively moderates this relationship, with the mitigating effect on financing constraints outweighing any potential misallocation of funds. Under the positive moderating influence of shadow banking development, the breadth of digital inclusive finance demonstrates a more substantial effect in promoting technological innovation in STAR Market companies. Further heterogeneity analysis indicates that the promoting effect of digital inclusive finance is more pronounced for STAR Market companies with a lower attention on artificial intelligence at the strategic level, suggesting that STAR Market companies in less popular fields benefit more from digital inclusive finance due to fewer financing channels than STAR Market companies with a high attention. The results suggest that the government should guide the deep integration of digital inclusive finance with technology-innovative enterprises, encourage financial institutions to enhance financing services in less popular fields, and moderately relax the stringent regulation on shadow banking to improve the efficiency of resource allocation in capital markets, thereby promoting technological innovation and high-quality economic development.

References

[1]  唐松, 伍旭川, 祝佳. 数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5): 52-66.
[2]  Brown, J.R., Martinsson, G. and Petersen, B.C. (2024) Do Financing Constraints Matter for R&D? Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[3]  根福, 郑明波, 温军, 等. 究竟哪些因素决定了中国企业的技术创新——基于九大中文经济学权威期刊和A股上市公司数据的再实证[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(1): 17-35.
[4]  蔡庆丰, 陈熠辉, 林焜. 信贷资源可得性与企业技术创新: 激励还是抑制?——基于银行网点数据和金融地理结构的微观证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(10): 124-140.
[5]  Saeed, A. and Sameer, M. (2015) Financial Constraints, Bank Concentration and SMEs: Evidence from Pakistan. Studies in Economics and Finance, 32, 503-524.
https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-02-2014-0046
[6]  Fuster, A. (2019) The Role of Technology in Mortgage Lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 32, 1854-1899.
[7]  钟凯, 梁鹏, 董晓丹, 等. 数字普惠金融与商业信用二次配置[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(1): 170-188.
[8]  任春芳. 经济不确定性对制造业上市企业创新的影响——数字金融的作用[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2023, 44(3): 339-348.
[9]  Lin, C., Ma, Y., Malatesta, P. and Xuan, Y. (2013) Corporate Ownership Structure and the Choice between Bank Debt and Public Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 517-534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.03.006
[10]  Bae, J., Biddle, G.C. and Park, C.W. (2022) Managerial Learning from Analyst Feedback to Voluntary Capex Guidance, Investment Efficiency, and Firm Performance. Management Science, 68, 583-607.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3896
[11]  Feyen, E., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., et al. (2021) Fintech and the Digital Transformation of Financial Services: Implications for Market Structure and Public Policy. BIS Papers.
[12]  Lee, H.H., Yang, S.A. and Kim, K. (2019) The Role of Fintech in Mitigating Information Friction in Supply Chain Finance. ADB Economics Working Paper Series.
[13]  李朝阳, 潘孟阳, 李建标. 数字金融、信贷可得性与企业技术创新——基于金融资源水平的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2021, 40(6): 39-46.
[14]  梁榜, 张建华. 数字普惠金融发展能激励技术创新吗?——来自中国城市和中小企业的证据[J]. 当代经济科学, 2019, 41(5): 74-86.
[15]  刘伟, 刘卫镇, 戴冰清. 数字普惠金融能驱动企业双元技术创新吗?——来自沪深上市公司数据的经验证据[J]. 金融发展研究, 2023(5): 46-53.
[16]  中国银保监会政策研究局课题组, 中国银保监会统计信息与风险监测部课题组. 中国影子银行报告[J]. 金融监管研究, 2020(11): 1-23.
[17]  郑建明, 许晨曦, 胡蕾. 影子银行、融资约束与企业研发投入[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(21): 93-98.
[18]  黄贤环, 吴秋生, 王瑶. 影子银行发展与企业投资行为选择: 实业投资还是金融投资? [J]. 会计研究, 2021(1): 100-111.
[19]  王善平, 彭莉莎. 国企高杠杆、影子银行活动对RD投入的挤出效应研究[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 42(3): 51-56.
[20]  邓永亮, 张华. 影子银行发展与企业技术创新投入——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(8): 108-128.
[21]  邵彤宇, 史嵘. 数字普惠金融对企业研发投入的影响研究[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2024, 45(2): 227-232.
[22]  白俊红, 蒋伏心. 协同技术创新、空间关联与区域技术创新绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(7): 174-187.
[23]  谢平, 邹传伟, 刘海二. 互联网金融手册[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014.
[24]  林爱杰, 梁琦, 傅国华. 数字金融发展与企业去杠杆[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(1): 142-158.
[25]  迟丽华, 石万举. 数字普惠金融对企业绩效的驱动效应——融资约束和研发投入的中介作用[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2023, 44(5): 552-563.
[26]  Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., et al. (2024) On the Rise of Fin Techs—Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[27]  Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A.X. and Hodson, J. (2020) Artificial Intelligence, Firm Growth, and Industry Concentration. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[28]  Beck, T., Pamuk, H., Ramrattan, R. and Uras, B.R. (2018) Payment Instruments, Finance and Development. Journal of Development Economics, 133, 162-186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.01.005
[29]  Gomber, P., Kauffman, R.J., Parker, C. and Weber, B.W. (2018) On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 220-265.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
[30]  程小可, 姜永盛, 郑立东. 影子银行、企业风险承担与融资约束[J]. 经济管理, 2015, 37(4): 106-115.
[31]  邵延进. 影子银行资金流向图谱及风险——以河北省为例[J]. 中国金融, 2011(18): 81-83.
[32]  刘珺, 盛宏清, 马岩. 企业部门参与影子银行业务机制及社会福利损失模型分析[J]. 金融研究, 2014(5): 96-109.
[33]  卢馨, 方睿孜, 毛丹. 我国影子银行对中小企业融资困境的影响[J]. 经济与管理, 2015, 29(3): 64-73.
[34]  Irani, R.M., Iyer, R., Meisenzahl, R.R. and Peydró, J. (2020) The Rise of Shadow Banking: Evidence from Capital Regulation. The Review of Financial Studies, 34, 2181-2235.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa106
[35]  Allen, F., Qian, Y., Tu, G. and Yu, F. (2019) Entrusted Loans: A Close Look at China’s Shadow Banking System. Journal of Financial Economics, 133, 18-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.01.006
[36]  李文贵, 余明桂. 民营化企业的股权结构与企业技术创新[J]. 管理世界, 2015(4): 112-125.
[37]  李春涛, 闫续文, 宋敏, 等. 金融科技与企业技术创新——新三板上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(1): 81-98.
[38]  陈思, 何文龙, 张然. 风险投资与企业技术创新: 影响和潜在机制[J]. 管理世界, 2017(1): 158-169.
[39]  郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4): 1401-1418.
[40]  谢绚丽, 沈艳, 张皓星, 等. 数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(4): 1557-1580.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133