全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

ChatGPT引发的知识产权伦理困境及其纾解
The Intellectual Property Ethical Dilemmas Caused by ChatGPT and Their Resolution

DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.141010, PP. 56-62

Keywords: ChatGPT,知识产权伦理,纾解,人机共生
ChatGPT
, Intellectual Property Ethics, Alleviation, Symbiosis between Humans and Machines

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

ChatGPT作为一种新型的生产力工具,对技术和人类社会的发展具有重大的进步意义,但也引发了显著的知识产权伦理困境,包括生成内容所属权、数据隐私问题、虚假信息传播、阻碍创新等,对这些问题的深入分析,有助于我们探索纾解ChatGPT引发的相关问题的有效途径。不仅如此,分析ChatGPT带来的伦理问题并探索相关的纾解路径具有显著的现实意义,即不仅促使公众正确认识ChatGPT的作用,而且也可以促使我们树立正确的科技观,从而努力寻找人类与技术发展的平衡点,达到促进人类与ChatGPT的关系朝着人机共生的良性图景发展的目的。
As a new type of productivity tool, ChatGPT has significant progressive significance for technology and human society, but it also causes significant intellectual property ethical dilemmas, including ownership of generated content, data privacy issues, spread of false information, and hindering innovation. A thorough analysis of these issues can help us explore effective ways to alleviate the problems caused by ChatGPT. Moreover, analyzing the ethical issues caused by ChatGPT and exploring relevant solutions has significant practical significance, as it not only helps the public correctly understand the role of ChatGPT but also helps us establish the right view of technology, thereby striving to find the balance between human and technological development and promote the development of a harmonious relationship between humans and ChatGPT towards the goal of achieving a benign scenario of human-machine symbiosis.

References

[1]  冯雨奂. ChatGPT在教育领域的应用价值、潜在伦理风险与治理路径[J]. 思想理论教育, 2023(4): 26-32.
[2]  van Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R. and Bockting, C.L. (2023) ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research. Nature, 614, 224-226.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
[3]  李木子. AI能列为论文作者吗? [N]. 中国科学报, 2023-01-20(001).
[4]  Gao, C.A., Howard, F.M., Markov, N.S., et al. (2023) Comparing Scientific Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT to Original Abstracts Using an Artificial Intelligence Output Detector, Plagiarism Detector, and Blinded Human Reviewers.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022. 12.23.521610
[5]  吴宗宪, 肖艳秋. 生成式人工智能的应用、风险与法律回应——以ChatGPT为视角[J]. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 12-20.
[6]  赖鄹, 吴巍, 杨晨, 等. ChatGPT的发展现状、风险及应对[J]. 中国信息安全, 2023(7): 86-89.
[7]  新浪财经. OpenAI被韩国隐私监管机构罚款, 因未及时报告ChatGPT泄露用户信息[EB/OL].
https://finance.sina.com.cn/world/2023-07-27/doc-imzeaure3297767.shtml, 2024-01-26.
[8]  唐代兴. 从GPT-4看人工智能的进化约束和伦理边界问题[J]. 伦理学研究, 2024(2): 81-92.
[9]  郑煌杰. 生成式AI数据风险治理的模式转型——从“传统治理”到“敏捷治理”[J/OL]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.19916/j.cnki.cn31-2011/d.20241028.008, 2024-11-08.
[10]  陈锐, 江奕辉. 生成式AI的治理研究: 以ChatGPT为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(1): 21-30.
[11]  张林. 生成式人工智能应用的风险研判及伦理规制[J]. 人民论坛, 2023(24): 136-138.
[12]  杨俊锋, 沈中奇, 陈睿宁. 生成式人工智能的教育应用及伦理风险探析[J]. 湖州师范学院学报, 2023, 45(12): 1-12.
[13]  熊杰, 张晓彤. 生成式人工智能的数据风险及其合规治理——以ChatGPT为样例[C]//上海市法学会. 《新兴权利》集刊2024年第1卷——智慧法治学术共同体研究文集. 成都: 成都理工大学文, 2024: 51-61.
[14]  马克思, 恩格斯, 列宁, 斯大林著作编译局. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第8卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 198.
[15]  习近平. 习近平谈治国理政: 第4卷[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2002: 202.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133