|
|
论道德直觉理论对学校道德教育的启示
|
Abstract:
自道德心理学情感革命以来，以社会直觉主义(SIM)为代表的研究对传统的理性主义模式提出了批判。这一学派认为道德判断不完全由人的理性决定，而是在很大程度上受到迅速自动的道德直觉的影响。文章从道德判断、道德直觉和学校德育的概念入手，旨在探讨乔纳森·海特的道德直觉理论对学校道德教育实践的启示。
Since the emotional revolution in moral psychology, research represented by social intuitionism (SIM) has criticized the traditional rationalist model. They believe that moral judgment is not entirely determined by human rationality, but is largely influenced by rapid and automatic moral intuition. Starting from the concepts of moral judgment, moral intuition and school moral education, this study aims to explore the enlightenment of Jonathan Haidt’s moral intuition theory on the practice of school moral education.
| [1] | 袁晓琳, 肖少北. 道德判断模式理论对我国学校德育工作的启示[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2008(12): 42-43+52. |
| [2] | 贾新奇. 美国道德心理学发展状况管窥[J]. 伦理学研究, 2011(5): 87-92. |
| [3] | 贾新奇. 论乔纳森·海特的社会直觉主义理论[J]. 道德与文明, 2010(6): 52-57. |
| [4] | Haidt, J. and Bjorklund, F. (2008) Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, 2, 181-217. |
| [5] | Chartrand, T.L. and Bargh, J.A. (1999) The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.893 |
| [6] | Haidt, J. (2007) The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651 |
| [7] | 李伯黍. 道德发展与德育模式[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1999. |
| [8] | 杨韶刚. 道德教育心理学[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2007. |
| [9] | 王学风. 多元文化社会的学校德育研究[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2005. |
| [10] | 吴安春. 回归道德智慧——转型期的道德教育与教师[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004. |
| [11] | [美]迈克尔·莫布森. 反直觉思考[M]. 北京: 中国友谊出版公司, 2015: 74-75. |
| [12] | Braun, K., Gaeth, G. and Levin, L. (1997) Framing Effects with Differential Impact: The Role of Attribute Salience. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 405. |
| [13] | 郝园. 解释水平对道德伪善的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2014. |
| [14] | Powell, T.E., Boomgaarden, H.G., de Swert, K. and de Vreese, C.H. (2015) A Clearer Picture: The Contribution of Visuals and Text to Framing Effects. Journal of Communication, 65, 997-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12184 |
