全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于PSR模型的中国直辖市基础设施韧性评估
Assessment of Infrastructure Resilience Based on PSR Model in China’s Four Municipalities

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.151001, PP. 1-10

Keywords: 城市韧性,PSR模型,基础设施韧性
Infrastructure Resilience
, Urban Resilience, Pressure-State-Response Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

城市基础设施的韧性水平直接关系到城市防灾减灾的能力,气候变化和人类活动对城市基础设施造成日益增加的压力。选取北京、天津、上海、重庆四个华北、华东和西南地区的中心城市作为研究对象,基于PSR模型从压力、状态、响应3个韧性维度构建评估指标体系,使用熵权TOPSIS法赋权并计算2017~2022年间四座城市的基础设施综合韧性水平,提出相应的对策建议。研究结果表明:2017~2022年四座直辖市的基础设施韧性水平总体呈上升趋势,北京的综合韧性水平最高;不同层级对基础设施韧性水平的影响力有所差异,状态韧性的影响最为显著,响应韧性最容易通过人为行动提升。
The resilience level of urban infrastructure, under increasing pressure caused by climate change and human activities, is directly related to the ability of disaster prevention and mitigation. Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing are respectively four central cities in North China, East China, and Southwest China, whose infrastructure resilience level have effect on surrounding areas. Therefore, we select four municipalities as study object, take 2017~2022 as the time dimension, formulate the evaluation index system based on the Pressure-State-Response Model, and calculate the weights of each index by the Entropy-Weight-Method. The results of the study show that: The infrastructure resilience level of the four municipalities in 2017~2022 is generally on the rise, and Beijing gets the highest score; the score of various dimensions have different impact on the comprehensive infrastructure resilience level, with the state resilience having the most significant impact, and the response resilience being easiest to improve through artificial measure.

References

[1]  陈玉梅, 李康晨. 国外公共管理视角下韧性城市研究进展与实践探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(1): 137-143.
[2]  赵瑞东, 方创琳, 刘海猛. 城市韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731.
[3]  程朋根, 付家能, 李聪毅, 等. 城市韧性量化评估研究进展[J]. 灾害学, 2023, 38(3): 139-147.
[4]  Jha, A.K., Miner, T.W. and Stanton-Geddes, Z. (2013) Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools, and Practice. World Bank Publications.
[5]  张嘉敏, 韩宝明. 基于压力-状态-响应的城市轨道交通客流预测综合后评估体系研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2011, 14(8): 31-35.
[6]  蒋文鑫, 吴军, 徐建刚. 城市生态韧性与经济发展水平耦合协调关系研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2023, 39(3): 299-308, 318.
[7]  史维良, 李博雅. 黄河流域三大城市群城市韧性空间网络结构研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(10): 1767-1780.
[8]  焦柳丹, 邓佳丽, 吴雅, 等. 基于PSR+云模型的城市韧性水平评价研究[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(5): 114-120.
[9]  Guo, K., Ji, Q. and Zhang, D. (2024) A Dataset to Measure Global Climate Physical Risk. Data in Brief, 54, Article ID: 110502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110502
[10]  尹萌萌, 刘梦婷, 朱伟, 等. 城市内涝灾害韧性评估及影响因子分析——以福州市为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20(10): 61-66.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133