全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

跨学科教学的国际经验与启示——以芬兰现象式教学为例
International Experience and Implications of Interdisciplinary Teaching—A Case Study of Phenomenon-Based Teaching in Finland

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.14122429, PP. 1396-1403

Keywords: 跨学科教学,芬兰,现象式教学
Interdisciplinary Teaching
, Finland, Phenomenon-Based Learning

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文以芬兰现象式教学为例,探讨跨学科教学的国际经验与启示。首先阐述关注跨学科教学的原因,指出跨学科教学对培养学生素养有重要意义,但教师在实施过程中存在困难。其次分析芬兰教育在国际上享有声誉,其现象式教学模式以基于现象的整合教学方式为核心,配合高质量师资保障和小班化班级规模。最后从现象教学的运用、教师队伍质量提升、班级规模优化和教师自主权赋予等方面,提出芬兰对我国跨学科教学的启示。
The paper takes Finnish phenomenon-based teaching as an example to explore the international experience and enlightenment of interdisciplinary teaching. Firstly, it elaborates the reasons for focusing on interdisciplinary teaching, pointing out that interdisciplinary teaching is of great significance for cultivating students’ literacy, but there are difficulties for teachers in the implementation process. Secondly, it analyzes that Finnish education enjoys a reputation internationally. Its phenomenon-based teaching model takes the integrated teaching method based on phenomena as the core, combined with high-quality teacher guarantee and small-class size. Finally, from the aspects of the application of phenomenon-based teaching, the improvement of the quality of the teaching team, the optimization of the class size and the granting of teachers’ autonomy, it puts forward the enlightenment of Finland to interdisciplinary teaching in China.

References

[1]  中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育课程方案(2022年版) [M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
[2]  蒋立兵, 王依然. 跨学科主题教学的实践困境与超越路径[J]. 当代教育科学, 2023(7): 36-42.
[3]  刘庆昌. 跨学科教学的三维阐释[J]. 北京教育学院学报, 2024, 38(1): 50-55.
[4]  吴静君, 蔡慧英. 中小学教师跨学科教学能力的发展现状与提升对策研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2024, 44(14): 47-52.
[5]  高潇怡, 孙慧芳. 小学科学教师的跨学科概念理解: 水平、特征与建议[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020, 32(6): 68-75.
[6]  杨伊, 夏惠贤, 王晶莹. 减负增效视角下我国科学教师专业发展困境的审视[J]. 上海教育科研, 2021(1): 60-65+32.
[7]  郑永和, 李佳, 吴军其, 等. 我国小学科学教师教学实践现状及影响机制——基于31个省(自治区、直辖市)的调研[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022(11): 46-57.
[8]  Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016) National Core Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary (Basic) Education.
[9]  科丝婷·罗卡. 现象式学习[M]. 北京: 中信出版集团, 2021: 233-259.
[10]  马小雯, 苏春景. 芬兰“基于现象的教学”对我国基础教育的启示[J]. 齐鲁师范学院学报, 2019, 34(6): 64-70.
[11]  National Board of Education (2004) National Core Curriculum 2004.
[12]  钱文丹. 这就是芬兰教育[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020: 135.
[13]  National Board of Education (2014) National Core Curriculum 2014.
[14]  李佳丽. 芬兰“研究为本”的教师教育课程设置探析[J]. 比较教育研究, 2018, 40(6): 52-58.
[15]  Department of Teacher Education (2024) Bachelor’s Degree Programme in Primary Teacher Education 2020-2024.
https://studyguide.Jyu.fi/2023/en/degree program/luoma2020/
[16]  Department of Teacher Education (2024) Master’s Degree Programme in Primary Teacher Education 2020-2024.
https://studyguide.jyu.fi/2023/en/degree program/luoma2020/
[17]  Riitta, J. (2021) Opettajan pedagogiset opinnot 60 op: Laaja-alainen opettajakelpoisuus-tilannekuvaus 2021.
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-866-3
[18]  刘兰英. 基于教师职业能力标准的全日制教育硕士生课程体系构建——以学科教学(数学)专业为例[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2024(8): 30-36.
[19]  关于公布《教育硕士专业学位研究生指导性培养方案(2023年修订版)》的通知[EB/OL].
https://edm.eduwest.com/viewnews.jsp?id=1390, 2023-08-05.
[20]  高海荣, 李永宇, 王雅苹, 等. “三习贯通”提升师范生教育教学实践能力路径探索[J]. 郑州师范教育, 2024, 13(2): 24-27.
[21]  Teacher Education Development Programme 2022-2026.
https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/164087
[22]  王奕婷. 基础教育课程整合的国际经验与启示——以芬兰国家核心课程为例[J]. 上海课程教学研究, 2018(4): 22-26.
[23]  Teachers and Principals in Finland 2019.
https://www.oph.fi/en/statistics-and-publications/publications/teachers-and-principals-finland-2019

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133