全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

文化产业高质量发展水平测度及区域差异分析
Measurement of High-Quality Development Level of Cultural Industry and Analysis of Regional Differences

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2024.1412390, PP. 3244-3254

Keywords: 文化产业,高质量发展,评价体系,熵权Topsis法,区域差异
Cultural Industry
, High-Quality Development, Evaluation System, Entropy-Based Topsis Method, Regional Differences

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

作为以文化创造和文化创新能力为核心的综合产业,文化产业具有高附加值、高创意及高市场活力的特征,已成为推动经济高质量发展的重要动力源泉。在此背景下,本文选取2012~2021年我国28个省市的面板数据,采用熵权Topsis、Dagum基尼系数及其分解法,对文化产业在我国的高质量发展水平及其发展差异来源展开探讨研究。结果表明:我国文化产业总体高质量发展水平整体呈现上升的趋势,东部地区最具发展优势;文化产业高质量发展区域差异来源主要来自于区域间差异,且呈逐步缩小态势,但距离高质量发展标准仍有较大差距。据此,论文从培育文化人才、完善公共设施、创新产业发展方式三方面提出相应的优化建议。
As a comprehensive industry centred on cultural creation and cultural innovation ability, cultural industry is characterised by high value-added, high creativity and high market vitality, and has become an important source of power to promote the high-quality development of the economy. In this context, this article selects the panel data of 28 provinces and cities in China from 2012 to 2021, and adopts the entropy weight topsis, Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition method to explore and research on the high-quality development level of cultural industry and its sources of development differences in China. The results show that the overall high-quality development level of China’s cultural industry shows an upward trend, and the eastern region has the most development advantages; the source of regional differences in the high-quality development of the cultural industry mainly comes from the inter-regional differences, and it is gradually narrowing, but there is still a big gap from the high-quality development standard. Accordingly, the thesis puts forward corresponding optimization suggestions from the aspects of cultivating cultural talents, perfecting public facilities and innovating industrial development methods.

References

[1]  李培峰. 新时代文化产业高质量发展: 内涵、动力、效用和路径研究[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2019(12): 113-123.
[2]  郑自立. 文化科技融合助推文化产业高质量发展的机理与策略[J]. 当代经济管理, 2019, 41(2): 53-59.
[3]  包国强, 陈天成, 黄诚. 数字文化产业高质量发展的内涵构建与路径选择[J]. 出版广角, 2021(3): 36-39.
[4]  宗祖盼. 深刻理解文化产业高质量发展的内涵与要求[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(10): 131-137.
[5]  史学慧, 张振鹏. 新时代文化产业高质量发展的新亮点、新要求和着力点[J]. 出版广角, 2019(9): 14-17.
[6]  魏鹏举. 中国文化产业高质量发展的战略使命与产业内涵[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 37(5): 48-55.
[7]  范玉刚. 健全体系是文化产业迈入新发展阶段的时代要求[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 38(1): 46-53.
[8]  江晓晗, 任晓璐. 长江经济带文化产业高质量发展水平测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(2): 15-19.
[9]  袁渊, 于凡. 文化产业高质量发展水平测度与评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(21): 62-66.
[10]  魏和清, 周庆岸, 李颖. 文化产业高质量发展水平测度与障碍因素分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(13): 11-15.
[11]  宁楠, 惠宁. 数字经济与文化产业高质量发展——基于新发展理念视角的分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(18): 16-21.
[12]  喻蕾. 文化产业高质量发展: 评价指标体系构建及其政策意义[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(6): 147-153.
[13]  丁仕潮. 中国文化产业高质量发展的时空演化特征[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(21): 119-122.
[14]  张安忠. 黄河流域文化产业高质量发展水平评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(4): 127-131.
[15]  李忠斌, 骆熙. 特色村寨文化产业高质量发展评价体系研究[J]. 民族研究, 2019(6): 32-47, 139-140.
[16]  陆建栖, 任文龙. 数字经济推动文化产业高质量发展的机制与路径——基于省级面板数据的实证检验[J]. 南京社会科学, 2022(5): 142-151.
[17]  干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16, 31.
[18]  李锦宏, 肖林. 文化产业高质量发展的区际比较与动态演进[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(4): 88-93.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133