|
Modern Linguistics 2024
网络语境下“狗”的形容词性用法变异探究
|
Abstract:
在网络语境中,“狗”突破了名词范畴,出现了典型的形容词用法,能够担任谓语、定语和补语,能够受程度副词、否定副词修饰,能够以肯定加否定的形式表示疑问,能够重叠并出现在特殊结构中。“狗”的句法、语义和语用功能都出现了新的变化和表现,本文对此进行了总结,并对其原因进行了分析,认为“狗”的含义本身是形容词化的语义基础,转喻隐喻机制是其内部动因,语言的经济性原则、网络媒体的助推、网民语用心理等是其变异的外部动因。
In the context of the internet, “dog” breaks through the category of nouns and appears in typical adjective usage. It can serve as a predicate, adjective, and complement, can be modified by degree adverbs and negative adverbs, can express doubts in the form of affirmation and negation, and can overlap and appear in special structures. The syntax, semantics, and pragmatic functions of “dog” have all undergone new changes and expressions. This article summarizes these changes and analyzes the reasons for them. It is believed that the meaning of “dog” itself is the semantic basis of adjectives, the metaphorical mechanism of metaphor is its internal driving force, and the economic principle of language, the promotion of online media, and the pragmatic psychology of netizens are external driving forces for its variation.
[1] | 中国互联网络信息中心. 第51次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL]. https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2023/0303/c88-10757.html, 2024-06-08. |
[2] | 陈伟. 英汉词汇中“狗”所包含的文化差异[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 14(1): 77-80, 92. |
[3] | 夏宗平. 从“XX狗”的流行看“狗”的类词缀化[J]. 现代语文(语言研究版), 2015(10): 60-61. |
[4] | 李军华, 聂纯叶. “VP成狗”的认知阐释[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报, 2016, 34(3): 1-5. |
[5] | 孔敏静. “X成狗”构式的生成及演变轨迹[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报, 2020, 38(6): 14-21. |
[6] | 孔敏静. 语法、语义和语用视角下对“X成狗”的多维考察[J]. 湖北文理学院学报, 2020, 41(6): 66-70. |
[7] | 董秀芳. 从指别到描述[J]. 语文研究, 2018(3): 3-4. |
[8] | 代宗艳. 当代汉语名词形容词化的表现形式及其形成机制——以“渣”为例[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报, 2021, 39(2): 17-25. |
[9] | 徐鑫. 汉语“狗”类高能产结构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2022. |
[10] | 刘丹青. 汉语的若干显赫范畴: 语言库藏类型学视角[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2012, 26(3): 291-305. |
[11] | Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press. |
[12] | 施春宏. 网络语言的语言价值和语言学价值[J]. 语言文字应用, 2010(3): 70-80. |