|
儒家伦理观升格视角下的“亲亲相隐”嬗变分析
|
Abstract:
“亲亲相隐”从先秦到隋唐经历了嬗变。所谓嬗变,是从性质和本质两个层面进行分析的。就性质层面而言是制度化,即从一种思想学说演进为一项法律制度;就本质层面而言,是义务化,即从权利本位演变为义务本位。而儒家伦理观从先秦到隋唐也经历了升格。所谓升格,也分为地位和效力两个层面。就地位层面而言是正统化,即从诸子学说之一提升为官方正统思想;就效力而言是强制化,即从宽松性规范强化为强制性规范。“亲亲相隐”嬗变的过程伴随着儒家伦理观的升格过程,在此过程中,儒家伦理观的升格推动了“亲亲相隐”的嬗变。
“Kin concealment” has undergone a transformation from the pre-Qin period to Sui and Tang dynasties. The so-called transformation is analyzed from two aspects: nature and essence. In terms of nature, it is institutionalized, that is, evolving from an ideological theory into a legal system; in the terms of the essence aspect, it is the obligation, that is, evolving from a right-based standard into an obligation-based standard. The Confucian ethical concepts have also experienced elevation from pre-Qin period to Sui and Tang dynasties. The so-called elevation is also divided into two levels: status and effectiveness. In terms of status level, it is orthodoxy-orientation, that is, being promoted from one of the theories to the official orthodox thought; in the terms of the effectiveness, it is compulsion-orientation, that is, being strengthened from a loose norm into a mandatory norm. The transformation of “kin concealment” is accompanied by the elevation of Confucian ethical concepts. During this process, the elevation of Confucian ethical concepts promotes the transformation of “kin concealment”.
[1] | 冯友兰. 中国哲学简史[M]. 涂又光, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013. |
[2] | 吴艳. 21世纪以来魏晋南北朝儒学发展研究述论[J]. 唐都学刊, 2017, 33(6): 92-98. |
[3] | 张鹤泉. 略论北朝儒生对“三礼”的传授[J]. 社会科学战线, 2009(7): 83-89. |
[4] | 梁满仓. 论魏晋南北朝时期的五礼制度化[J]. 中国史研究, 2001(4): 27-52. |
[5] | 吴波, 刘晓琴. “亲亲相隐”的再批判[J]. 法制与社会, 2007(9): 60-61. |
[6] | 连诗. 亲亲相隐与亲属拒证权比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020. |