|
Dispute Settlement 2024
论我国刑事电子数据证据制度的完善
|
Abstract:
司法是实现法治的前提基础。社会的稳定和人民的福祉取决于司法机关的努力。近年来科学技术的快速发展为人们的日常生活提供了极大的便利,但科学技术双面性也为违法犯罪创造了更多的“机会”,导致司法机关面临的形式更加困难。电子犯案事件越发成为当前形势下的主要犯罪行为,其依托手机、电脑等电子设备跨区域犯罪或电子诈骗行为,这就为电子数据的出现提供了契机。电子数据是刑诉诉讼法中独立的证据类型,其能够确保较高的数据保存度,为司法活动的开展提供支撑。
Judiciary is the prerequisite and foundation for realizing the rule of law. The stability of society and the well-being of the people depend on the efforts of the judicial authorities. In recent years, the rapid development of science and technology has provided great convenience for people’s daily lives, but the dual nature of science and technology has also created more “opportunities” for illegal activities, leading to more difficult forms for judicial organs to face. Electronic crime incidents have increasingly become the main criminal behavior in the current situation, relying on electronic devices such as mobile phones and computers to commit cross regional crimes or electronic fraud, which provides an opportunity for the emergence of electronic data. Electronic data is an independent type of evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law, which can ensure a high degree of data presser- vation and provide support for the development of judicial activities.
[1] | 褚福民. 电子证据真实性的三个层面——以刑事诉讼为例的分析[J]. 法学研究, 2018, 40(4): 121-138. |
[2] | 刘译矾. 论电子数据的双重鉴真[J]. 当代法学, 2018, 32(3): 88-98. |
[3] | 邢永杰, 张杨杨. 刑事诉讼中电子数据真实性审查“三步法则” [J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 35(4): 75-83. |
[4] | 喻海松. 刑事电子数据的规制路径与重点问题[J]. 环球法律评论, 2019, 41(1): 35-47. |
[5] | 谢登科. 电子数据网络在线提取规则反思与重构[J]. 东方法学, 2020(3): 89-100. |