催收非法债务罪之法益探究
A Study on the Legal Interests of the Crime of Collection of Illegal Debts

自《刑法修正案(十一)》实施到现在，不论是在催收的行为手段的认定上，还是在区分催收非法债务罪和其他罪名的界限上，都有着不当扩张之倾向，这与立法本意背道而驰。究其原因，在于对催收非法债务罪的法益之认定不够清晰明确。催收非法债务罪的法益应为复合法益，应坚持破坏公共秩序和侵害个人权益相统一。在对本罪法益进行认定之时，应当结合我国现实的经济发展背景以及扫黑除恶时势。在对催收手段的认定上，应与有组织犯罪相联系，以发挥法益对催收手段的限制作用。
Since the implementation of the “Criminal Law Amendment (Eleventh)”, whether it is in the identification of the means of collection, or in the distinction between the crime of collection of illegal debt and other charges, there is a tendency of improper expansion, which runs counter to the intention of the legislation. The reason is that the legal interest of the crime of collecting illegal debts is not clear enough. The legal interests of the crime of collecting illegal debts should be compounded legal interests, and the unity of disrupting public order and infringing individual rights and interests should be adhered to. In the identification of the legal interest of this crime, we should combine the economic development background of our country and the current situation of eradicating evil. In the identification of collection means, it should be connected with organized crime, so as to exert the restriction effect of legal interests on collection means.