|
Modern Linguistics 2024
基于LCCM理论针对复杂多义词的大学英语教学实证研究
|
Abstract:
本研究采用汉译英与英译汉的实验设计,以大学英语四六级非高阶水平的大学生为研究对象,运用书面测试和思维报告的方法探讨了词汇概念和认知模型理论(LCCM理论)对多词性多义实词习得的作用。本研究结果表明,基于LCCM理论所构建的语义网络图能够显著提高学习者习得多词性多义实词的能力,对习得该类词汇的低频义项的促进作用尤为显著。经延时后测检验该习得方法也具有长期的记忆保持作用。学习者在推理语义时的心理表征也呈现出了有理有据的逻辑链条:追根溯源–辨析词性–确立模型–合理推断。可知,基于LCCM理论的教学法有效地提高了学习者的认知加工深度从而促进了长时习得。
This study targeting at the non-advanced Chinese college EFL learners employed the translation test paradigm and think-aloud report to explore the effect of LCCM on teaching intricate polysemous words with multiple parts of speech. Detailed quantitative analysis indicates that the LCCM-based pedagogical approach significantly improves their ability to infer the unacquired meanings of complex polysemous words, the semantic items of low frequency in particular. Furthermore, the delay test and think-aloud test results manifest participants’ long-term retention and mental reasoning logic chain: 1) retrieving the core sense, 2) identifying the word class, 3) activating the cognitive model, 4) making reasonable inferences. The current study adds to the pedagogical significance of LCCM theory by proving that LCCM boosts learners’ lexical inference ability and secures long-term retention of target words.
[1] | 瞿云华, 张建理. 英语多义系统习得实证研究[J]. 外语研究, 2005, 22(2): 43-48. |
[2] | 张绍全. 英语专业学生多义词习得的认知语言学研究[J]. 外国语文, 2010, 26(4): 101-107. |
[3] | 史一鸿. 一词多义的认知探究及其对英语多义词教学的启示[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 8(1): 79-8289. |
[4] | 曾望. 原型范畴理论下英语多义词教学平台的搭建[J]. 当代教育理论与实践, 2015, 7(5): 113-115. |
[5] | 陈朗. 二语词汇教学的隐喻能力方略新境界[J]. 外语学刊, 2017(2): 105-109. |
[6] | Evans, V. (2006) Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 491-534. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog.2006.016 |
[7] | 任朝华. 基本义在多义动词习得中促进作用的实证研究. [J]. 山东外语教学. 2009, 30(2): 22-26. |
[8] | 吴白音那. 认知语言学视角下的英语介词教学研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2012, 25(11): 119-123. |
[9] | 张吉强. LCCM理论视角的概念多义[J]. 现代交际, 2020(17): 91-93. |
[10] | Evans, V. (2009) How Words Mean. Oxford University Press. |
[11] | Evans, V. (2015) A Unified Account of Polysemy within LCCM Theory. Lingua, 157, 100-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.002 |
[12] | 费红, 覃丽赢. LCCM理论框架下词汇隐喻的意义构建[J]. 学术探究, 2013(11): 77-80. |
[13] | 滕敏, 朱哲. 基于词汇概念和认知模型理论的多义词习得研究[J]. 外语界, 2015(4): 25-33. |
[14] | 谢文婷. 基于LCCM理论的大学生英语介词习得实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2016. |
[15] | 宗琦. 基于LCCM理论的多义动词习得研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2012. |
[16] | 杨丽姣. 词类区分词义计量分析[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 42(1): 47-52. |
[17] | Nation, P. and Beglar, D.A. (2007) Vocabulary Size Test. The Language Teacher, 31, 9-13. |
[18] | Crossley, S., Salsbury, T. and McNamara, D. (2010) The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x |
[19] | 李增垠. 基于原型理论的英语词典义项排列模式研究[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(2): 80-85. |
[20] | 源可乐. 英语词典义项的排列策略[J]. 现代外语, 2002, 25(3): 276-283. |
[21] | Evans, V. (2005) The Meaning of Time: Polysemy, the Lexicon and Conceptual Structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 33-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226704003056 |
[22] | 苗丽霞, 王文斌. 大学生多义词词义知识发展考察[J]. 外语界. 2010(5): 58-66, 86. |
[23] | Greidanus, T. and Nienhuis, L. (2001) Testing the Quality of Word Knowledge in a Second Language by Means of Word Associations: Types of Distractors and Types of Associations. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00126 |
[24] | Zhang, D. and Yang, X. (2016) Chinese L2 Learners’ Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Its Role in Reading Comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 699-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12225 |
[25] | Verspoor, M. and Lowie, W. (2003) Making Sense of Polysemous Words. Language Learning, 53, 547-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00234 |
[26] | Wesche, M.B. and Paribakht, T.S. (2009) Lexical Inferencing in a First and Second Language: Cross-Linguistic Dimensions. Channel View Publications. |
[27] | Zabotkina, V.I. and Boyarskaya, E.L. (2013) Sense Disambiguation in Polysemous Words: Cognitive Perspective. Psychology in Russia: State of Art, 6, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2013.0306 |