Background: This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two formulations of metformin 1000 mg XR tablets in healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions. Methods: This was a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two-period, two-sequence, crossover and single-dose study to compare the bioequivalence (BE) profile of Metformin (metformin hydrochloride) 1000 mg XR tablet of Laboratorios Leti S.A.V., with Glucophage? (metformin hydrochloride) 1000 mg XR tablet of Merck Serono GmbH in 26 adult healthy subjects. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters Cmax,
and
were calculated based on the plasma drug concentration-time profile measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The safety was assessed throughout the study. The two formulations test (T) and reference (R) were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence interval (CI) were within BE acceptance range of 80.00% - 125.00% for Cmax,
and
. Results: A total of 25 subjects completed both study periods 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test/reference ratios were Cmax: 92.30% (89.08% - 96.97%),
: 91.83% (87.11% - 94.11%) and
: 91.83% (87.23% - 94.85%) to metformin 1000 mg extended release. PK parameters were within the accepted
References
[1]
LaMoia, T.E. and Shulman, G.I. (2020) Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Metformin Action. EndocrineReviews, 42, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa023
[2]
Yendapally, R., Sikazwe, D., Kim, S.S., Ramsinghani, S., Fraser-Spears, R., Witte, A.P., et al. (2020) A Review of Phenformin, Metformin, and Imeglimin. DrugDevelopmentResearch, 81, 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21636
[3]
MacDonald, M.J., Ansari, I.H., Longacre, M.J. and Stoker, S.W. (2021) Metformin’s Therapeutic Efficacy in the Treatment of Diabetes Does Not Involve Inhibition of Mitochondrial Glycerol Phosphate Dehydrogenase. Diabetes, 70, 1575-1580. https://doi.org/10.2337/db20-1143
[4]
Chaudhary, S. and Kulkarni, A. (2024) Metformin: Past, Present, and Future. CurrentDiabetesReports, 24, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-024-01539-1
[5]
Foretz, M., Guigas, B. and Viollet, B. (2019) Understanding the Glucoregulatory Mechanisms of Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. NatureReviewsEndocrinology, 15, 569-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0242-2
[6]
European Medicines Agency (2024) Glugofage® XR Tablets 1000mg: Summary of Product Characteristics. https://www.tmda.go.tz/uploads/files/Metformin_Hydrochloride_1000%20mg_Tablets_Merck_Serono_Ltd.pdf
[7]
Nemeth, D.V., Iannelli, L., Gangitano, E., D’Andrea, V. and Bellini, M.I. (2024) Energy Metabolism and Metformin: Effects on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation. Biomedicines, 12, Article 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12071534
[8]
Harahap, Y., Purnasari, S., Hayun, H., Dianpratami, K. and Wulandari, M. (2011) Bioequivalence Study of Metformin Hcl XR Caplet Formulations in Healthy Indonesian Volunteers. JournalofBioequivalence&Bioavailability, 3, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.4172/jbb.1000051
[9]
European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2024) Investigation of Bioequivalence—Scientific Guideline. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-e6-r2-good-clinical-practice-scientific-guideline#current-version-8263
[10]
European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2024) Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Evaluation of Modified-Release Dosage Forms—Scientific Guideline. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/pharmacokinetic-clinical-evaluation-modified-release-dosage-forms-scientific-guideline
Singh, N., Madkaikar, N., Gokhale, P. and Parmar, D. (2020) New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules 2019: Changes in Responsibilities of the Ethics Committee. PerspectivesinClinicalResearch, 11, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_208_19
[13]
World Medical Association (2001) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310, 2191-2194.
[14]
Guideline, I.H. (2002) E6: Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (PMP/ICH/135/95). European Medicines Agency. https://www.imim.cat/media/upload/arxius/emea.pdf
[15]
Hema Nagadurga, D. (2020) Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. In: Ahmad, U. and Akhtar, J., Eds., Pharmaceutical Formulation Design—Recent Practices, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85145
[16]
Karalis, V., Symillides, M. and Macheras, P. (2011) Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs: A Comparison of the Newly Proposed Regulatory Approaches by FDA and Ema. PharmaceuticalResearch, 29, 1066-1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0651-y
[17]
Julious, S.A. (2004) Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials with Normal Data. StatisticsinMedicine, 23, 1921-1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1783
[18]
Noubiap, J.J., Nansseu, J.R., Lontchi-Yimagou, E., Nkeck, J.R., Nyaga, U.F., Ngouo, A.T., et al. (2022) Global, Regional, and Country Estimates of Metabolic Syndrome Burden in Children and Adolescents in 2020: A Systematic Review and Modelling Analysis. TheLancetChild&AdolescentHealth, 6, 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(21)00374-6
[19]
Pena, E., Inatti, A., Taly, A., Chacón, J.G. and Serrano-Martin, X. (2023) Bioequivalence Assessment of Two Formulations of Empagliflozin in Healthy Adult Subjects. AmericanJournalofPharmacotherapyandPharmaceuticalSciences, 2, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.25259/ajpps_2023_019
[20]
Pena, E., Inatti, A., Taly, A., Chacón, J. and Serrano-Martin, X. (2024) A Bioequivalence Study of Empagliflozin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination in Healthy Subjects under Fasting Conditions. JournalofBiosciencesandMedicines, 12, 235-250. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2024.129022