全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

渐进决策模型视角下德国长期护理保险政策研究
A Study on the German Long-Term Care Insurance Policy from the Perspective of Gradual Decision Model

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13121113, PP. 349-357

Keywords: 渐进决策模型,德国,长期护理保险,政策演变,中国借鉴
The Gradual Decision-Making Model
, Germany, Long-Term Care Insurance, Policy Evolution, China’s Reference

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

全球人口老龄化问题日益严峻,德国作为较早实施长期护理保险政策的国家,其渐进的政策演变为其他国家提供了宝贵的经验。本文基于渐进主义模型,从时间轴出发,探讨德国长期护理保险政策在政治、经济、社会等因素推动下的逐步演变过程。通过梳理政策的制定、改革和完善的历程,本文深入分析了渐进式政策变迁的逻辑,尤其是如何通过政策渐进调整应对人口老龄化、护理需求增加等挑战。同时,本文结合巴伐利亚州,探讨了政策的实施效果和成效。最后,本文借鉴德国经验,对中国长期护理保险制度的发展提出建议,包括多元筹资机制、分级护理服务模式、服务质量监管体系等,以期为中国的老龄化问题提供切实可行的政策参考。
The issue of global aging population is becoming increasingly serious, and Germany, as one of the countries that implemented a long-term care insurance policy earlier, has provided valuable experience for other countries through its gradual policy evolution. Based on the gradualism model, this paper explores the gradual evolution process of Germany’s long-term care insurance policy from the perspective of time axis, discussing how political, economic, and social factors have driven the policy’s gradual evolution. By sorting out the process of policy formulation, reform, and improvement, this paper deeply analyzes the logic of gradual policy change, especially how to address challenges such as aging population and increasing care needs through gradual policy adjustments. At the same time, this paper discusses the implementation effects and achievements of the policy in Bavaria. Finally, this paper draws on the German experience to offer suggestions for the development of China’s long-term care insurance system, including a diversified funding mechanism, a tiered care service model, and a quality supervision system for services, in order to provide practical policy references for China’s aging problem.

References

[1]  Harrington, C.A., Geraedts, M. and Heller, G.V. (2002) Germany’s Long Term Care Insurance Model: Lessons for the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23, 44-65.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3343118
[2]  Campbell, J.C., Ikegami, N. and Kwon, S. (2009) Policy Learning and Cross‐National Diffusion in Social Long‐Term Care Insurance: Germany, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. International Social Security Review, 62, 63-80.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246x.2009.01346.x
[3]  Nadash, P., Doty, P. and von Schwanenflügel, M. (2017) The German Long-Term Care Insurance Program: Evolution and Recent Developments. The Gerontologist, 58, 588-597.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx018
[4]  刘涛. 德国长期护理保险制度的缘起、运行、调整与改革[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 49(1): 74-86.
[5]  刘芳. 德国社会长期护理保险制度的起源、动因及其启示[J]. 社会建设, 2022, 9(5): 52-65.
[6]  拉尔夫·格茨, 海因茨·罗特岗, 苏健. 德国长期护理保险制度变迁: 财政和社会政策交互视角[J]. 江海学刊, 2015(5): 42-47.
[7]  郝君富, 李心愉. 德国长期护理保险: 制度设计、经济影响与启示[J]. 人口学刊, 2014, 36(2): 104-112.
[8]  孙志萍. 长期护理保险与基本医疗保险的混同与分割——以德国为镜鉴[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(3): 93-103.
[9]  孙晨晗, 胡敏, 陈文. 德国长期护理服务质量监管的经验与启示[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2023, 16(9): 72-79.
[10]  马晶, 杨天红. 长期护理需求评估体系建设研究——基于地方试点与德国实践[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(2): 176-187.
[11]  仲利娟. 德国长期护理保险制度的去商品化及其启示[J]. 河南社会科学, 2018, 26(7): 81-85.
[12]  房连泉. 老年护理服务的市场化发展路径——基于德国、日本和韩国长期护理保险制度的经验比较[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 40(2): 88-98+2.
[13]  肖颖, 朱勤, 王雪辉. 长期护理保险的再分配与社会投资功能: 来自德日韩的经验与启示[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2023, 16(7): 23-30.
[14]  许敏敏, 段娜. 德国长期护理保险及其筹资机制经验对我国的启示[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2019(7): 99-103.
[15]  刘芳. 德国社会长期护理保险制度的运行理念及启示[J]. 德国研究, 2018, 33(1): 61-76+135.
[16]  景跃军, 孟石, 李元. 德美日长期护理保险资金筹集模式的特点及启示[J]. 延边大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 51(2): 101-107+143.
[17]  余紫君, 赵晨悦, 褚淑贞. 中德长期护理保险制度对比及对我国的启示[J]. 医学与社会, 2019, 32(5): 67-71.
[18]  罗丽娅. 德国长期护理保险制度的风险定位、发展演变与政策启示[J]. 社会保障研究, 2023(6): 92-100.
[19]  尹海燕. 可持续的公共长期护理保险筹资机制: 国外经验与中国方案[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2020(5): 166-175.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133