全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

浅议代位执行制度
An Exploration of the Subrogation Execution System

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.12121003, PP. 7063-7072

Keywords: 代位执行,履行到期债务通知书,执行难
Subrogation
, Fulfillment of Due Debt Notices, Difficulty in Enforcement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在我国当前民事执行难的背景之下,探讨和完善执行制度是解决“执行难”的现实需要,而代位执行制度是为提高执行效率而作出的一种独特执行措施,自1992年确立以来在司法实践中起到了重要作用。2015民诉法司法解释对该制度作出进一步完善。最高院历年司法解释也对代位执行制度作出相关规定。但在司法实践中,不论是其运用还是相关法律条文的规定都存在诸多问题,使代位执行程度并未完全发挥其应有的价值,本文希望能够在梳理清楚代位执行制度的基础理论,对当下到期债权代位执行程序中所遇到的问题进行整理,以便该制度可以得到更好的运行,从而使其发挥立法初衷,为解决“三角债”“执行难”等司法实践问题贡献力量。
Under the background of China’s current civil enforcement difficulties, exploring and improving the enforcement system is a practical need to solve the “enforcement difficulty”, and the subrogation enforcement system is a unique enforcement measure made to improve the efficiency of enforcement, which has played an important role in judicial practice since its establishment in 1992. The 2015 Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law further improves the system. Judicial interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court over the years have also made relevant provisions on the subrogation enforcement system. However, in judicial practice, there are many problems in both its application and the provisions of relevant legal provisions, so that the degree of subrogation enforcement has not fully exerted its due value, this article hopes to sort out the basic theory of the subrogation enforcement system, sort out the problems encountered in the current subrogation enforcement procedure of mature claims, and further improve the subrogation enforcement system, so that the system can be better operated, so that it can play its original legislative intention, in order to solve the “triangular debt” “enforcement difficulty” and other judicial practice issues.

References

[1]  范响. 债权执行中次债务人保护机制之再审视[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2024(2): 95-103+149.
https://doi.org/10.20003/j.cnki.xjshkx.2024.02.0010
[2]  姜艳. 第三人到期债权执行名义的正当性刍议[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2020, 19(3): 73-77.
[3]  谭秋桂. 对债权执行制度的反思与重构[J]. 人民司法, 2021(10): 20-25.
https://doi.org/10.19684/j.cnki.1002-4603.2021.10.003
[4]  庄加园. 初探债权执行程序的理论基础——执行名义欠缺的质疑与收取诉讼的构造尝试[J]. 现代法学, 2017, 39(3): 132-147.
[5]  马登科, 张翼. 对第三人债权执行的理论基础与实现路径——兼评《民事强制执行法(草案)》中的制度创新[J]. 北方法学, 2023, 17(1): 35-52.
https://doi.org/10.13893/j.cnki.bffx.2023.01.008
[6]  陈杭平, 李凯. 中国语境下的债权执行制度——兼论《民事强制执行法》与《民法典》的衔接[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2021, 29(3): 17-32.
[7]  胡婷. 债权执行程序的反思与修正[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(1): 150-163.
[8]  高小刚. 到期债权执行问题研究——以执裁分离实践及典型案例分析为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2019(10): 101-111.
[9]  王毓莹, 沈建红, 李炳录. 到期债权执行异议的处理路径[J]. 人民司法, 2021(10): 14-19.
https://doi.org/10.19684/j.cnki.1002-4603.2021.10.007
[10]  羊芙蓉. 代位权诉讼和债权执行二元模式论——兼论《民法典》第537条第2句之适用[J]. 民商法论丛, 2022, 73(1): 27-51.
[11]  唐力. 债权执行的程序保障[J]. 中国应用法学, 2023(2): 89-100.
[12]  杨悦, 杨友学. 到期债权执行异议的审查路径及救济方式[J]. 中国检察官, 2022(11): 47-50.
[13]  魏锋. 试论对被执行人债权的执行[J]. 法学杂志, 2010, 31(S1): 127-129.
https://doi.org/10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2010.s1.032
[14]  曲冰, 胡晓男. 案外第三人视角下的代位执行制度研究[J]. 法制与经济, 2020(4): 140-141.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133