Background: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, characterized by progressive optic nerve damage and visual field loss, often associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Traditional treatment options include medications and surgical interventions; however, many patients experience refractory glaucoma that does not respond adequately to standard therapies. Ultrasound cycloplasty has emerged as a promising alternative for managing refractory glaucoma by reducing IOP through targeted tissue ablation. Due to the limited relevant research on the perioperative nursing of UCP, this study explores the key nursing points during the perioperative period of ultrasound cycloplasty. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 53 glaucoma patients, including preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, use of antiglaucoma medications, and ocular pain scores. Preoperative nursing includes medical history assessment, surgical explanation, and ocular examination. Postoperatively, IOP monitoring and medication guidance were provided. Results: Postoperative IOP was significantly reduced, the number of antiglaucoma medications used decreased, and ocular pain scores were notably lower. At three months postoperatively, 96.23% of patients exhibited a decrease in IOP. Ultrasound Cycloplasty effectively lowered IOP, alleviated ocular pain, and reduced the use of antiglaucoma medications in patients with various types of glaucoma. Conclusion: Ultrasound Cycloplasty is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for treating glaucoma. Proper clinical nursing plays a crucial role in the success of the surgery and the patient’s recovery, including preoperative communication and education, intraoperative monitoring and technical proficiency, as well as postoperative IOP monitoring and care. Long-term IOP monitoring and regular nursing assessments are recommended for patients undergoing this procedure to ensure the durability and safety of the treatment outcomes.
References
[1]
Tham, Y., Li, X., Wong, T.Y., Quigley, H.A., Aung, T. and Cheng, C. (2014) Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040. Ophthalmology, 121, 2081-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
[2]
Midha, N., Dhawan, M., Hans, T. and Sandhu, P.S. (2019) Evaluation of Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma: A Hospital-Based Study. Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice, 13, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1242
[3]
Wan, M.J., Daniel, S., Kassam, F., Mutti, G., Butty, Z., Kasner, O., et al. (2010) Survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Glaucoma Patients. Journal of Glaucoma, 21, 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0b013e3182027c0c
[4]
Renard, J., Rouland, J., Bron, A., Sellem, E., Nordmann, J., Baudouin, C., et al. (2012) Nutritional, Lifestyle and Environmental Factors in Ocular Hypertension and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: An Exploratory Case-Control Study. Acta Ophthalmologica, 91, 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02356.x
[5]
Kwon, Y.H., Fingert, J.H., Kuehn, M.H. and Alward, W.L.M. (2009) Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1113-1124. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra0804630
[6]
Lee, D.A. and Higginbotham, E.J. (2005) Glaucoma and Its Treatment: A Review. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 62, 691-699. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/62.7.691
[7]
Aptel, F., Tadjine, M. and Rouland, J. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Ultrasound Cycloplasty Procedures in Patients with Early or Delayed Failure after a First Procedure. Journal of Glaucoma, 29, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000001400
[8]
Zhou, L.F., Hu, D., Lan, J., et al. (2020) Efficacy and Safety of Single Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty to Treat Refractory Glaucoma: Results at 1 Year. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 32, 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120973605
[9]
Wang, R.X., Wang, T. and Li, N. (2020) A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Cycloplasty and Cyclocryotherapy for the Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4016536
[10]
Pellegrini, M., Sebastiani, S., Giannaccare, G. and Campos, E.C. (2019) Intraocular Inflammation after Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty for the Treatment of Glaucoma. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 12, Article 338.
[11]
Liu, H. (2015) Comparing Welch ANOVA, a Kruskal-Wallis Test, and Traditional ANOVA in Case of Heterogeneity of Variance. Virginia Commonwealth University.
[12]
Figus, M., Posarelli, C., Nardi, M., Stalmans, I., Vandewalle, E., Melamed, S., et al. (2021) Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty for Treatment of Surgery-Naïve Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, 2-Year Follow-Up Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, Article 4982. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214982
[13]
Almobarak, F.A., Alrubean, A., Alsarhani, W., Aljenaidel, A. and Osman, E.A. (2022) Outcomes and Predictors of Failure of Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11, Article 6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226770
[14]
Wei, Y., Su, Y., Fang, L., Guo, X., Chen, S., Han, Y., et al. (2022) Effect of Combined Surgery in Patients with Complex Nanophthalmos. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11, Article 5909. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195909
[15]
Ke, S., He, L. and Qiu, H. (2019) Analysis on Control of Humanized Nursing over Surgical Stress and Postoperative Infection in Operating Room Nursing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 12, 13550-13557.
[16]
Arnold, R.W. (2021) The Oculocardiac Reflex: A Review. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 2693-2725. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s317447
[17]
Dewar, K.M.S. and Wishart, H.Y. (1976) The Oculocardiac Reflex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 69, 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/003591577606900533
[18]
Kyari, F. and Abdull, M.M. (2016) The Basics of Good Postoperative Care after Glaucoma Surgery. Community Eye Health, 29, 29-31.
[19]
Almobarak, F.A., Alrubean, A., Alsarhani, W.K., Aljenaidel, A. and Osman, E.A. (2022) Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Glaucoma: 2-Year Outcomes. Journal of Glaucoma, 31, 834-838. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000002078
[20]
Chen, D., Guo, X., Luo, S., Lu, Y. and Tang, X. (2022) Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmology, 22, Article No. 401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02622-5
[21]
Wu, T., Li, J. and Lu, P. (2023) Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty for the Treatment of Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 16, 1317-1325. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.08.19
[22]
Luo, Q., Xue, W., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Wang, S., Dong, Y., et al. (2021) Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty in Chinese Glaucoma Patients: Results of a 6-Month Prospective Clinical Study. Ophthalmic Research, 65, 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515013
[23]
Yu, Q., Liang, Y., Ji, F. and Yuan, Z. (2020) Comparison of Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty and Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Refractory Glaucoma in Chinese Population. BMC Ophthalmology, 20, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01655-y
[24]
Bolek, B., Wylęgała, A. and Wylęgała, E. (2022) Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty in Glaucoma Treatment: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Acta Ophthalmologica, 101, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15290
[25]
Almobarak, F.A., Alrubean, A., Alsarhani, W.K., Aljenaidel, A. and Osman, E.A. (2023) Two-Year Outcomes of Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty as a First Procedure in Glaucoma. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 38, 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2170715
