|
哈贝马斯交往行为理论的当代价值研究
|
Abstract:
作为“后法兰克福”学派重要的代表人物,哈贝马斯在批判继承前法兰克福学派社会批判理论的基础上,创造性地提出了交往行为理论,即如何通过语言这一媒介实现主体间的互相理解,进而协调自身行为,并最终达成共识。但达成共识的前提则是坚持“理性”,而交往理性的核心则是主体间性。哈贝马斯的交往行为理论不仅对资本主义社会,并且也对社会主义社会的发展产生了深远的影响。同时,它也存在一定的局限性。
As an important representative of the “post-Frankfurt” school, Habermas creatively proposed the theory of communicative behavior on the basis of criticizing and inheriting the social critical theory of the pre-Frankfurt School, that is, how to realize mutual understanding between subjects through the medium of language, and then coordinate their own behavior, and finally reach a consensus. But the premise of reaching consensus is to adhere to “rationality”, and the core of communicative rationality is intersubjectivity. Habermas’ communicative behavior theory has exerted a profound influence not only on capitalist society, but also on the development of socialist society. At the same time, it also has certain limitations.
[1] | 尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 交往行为理论(第一卷) [M]. 洪佩郁, 蔺菁, 译. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1994. |
[2] | 傅永军. 哈贝马斯交往行为合理化理论述评[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003(3): 9-14. |
[3] | 尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 交往与社会进化[M]. 张博树, 译. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1989. |
[4] | 夏宏. 话语共识: 后形而上学社会的实质正义标准[J]. 现代哲学, 2003(3): 106-112. |
[5] | 杜建军. 论新型师生关系的构建——基于哈贝马斯交往行为理论的研究[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 58(4): 129-135. |
[6] | 张敏. 哈贝马斯交往行为理论的合理性[J]. 江西社会科学, 2014, 34(8): 44-47. |